CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6731P vs Intel Xeon 6732P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6731P is a 32-core, 64-thread server and workstation processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, targeting single-socket platforms with 8-channel DDR5-6400, 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes, and built-in accelerators for AI, storage, and networking workloads.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- AMX and AVX-512 provide strong CPU-based AI inference and small-batch training
- Not a replacement for dedicated GPUs or accelerators for large models
- Well-suited for edge inference, analytics, and MLPerf inference workloads
- Intel AMX (BF16/INT8) and AVX-512 accelerate CPU-based inference.
- Well suited for small to medium LLMs, embedding models, and classic ML.
- Not a replacement for dedicated accelerators for large-scale training.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Server-focused SKU without official gaming benchmarks
- Single-threaded performance is strong, but gaming is not a target workload
- Use desktop or consumer HEDT CPUs for gaming-focused builds
- No integrated graphics; requires discrete GPU.
- High single-thread clocks help some game servers, but platform is not optimized for gaming.
- GPU-bound game servers may still run well depending on title and configuration.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 32 P-cores with strong per-core performance and AVX-512/AMX
- 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes for dense NVMe/GPU configurations
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 with up to 4 TB capacity
- Integrated QAT/DLB/DSA/IAA accelerators for storage, networking, and analytics
- 1S platform reduces board and licensing complexity
Cons
- 245 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery
- 1S-only; no multi-socket upgrade path
- Not on the densest process node; some EPYC competitors are more power-efficient per core
- No integrated graphics (typical for server CPUs)
- Platform cost is high compared to mainstream desktop parts
Pros
- 32 high-frequency P-cores with strong per-core performance.
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 with MRDIMM support for high bandwidth.
- 144 MB L3 cache per socket improves working-set performance.
- Intel AMX and AVX-512 accelerate AI and HPC on CPU.
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for flexible I/O in dual-socket servers.
- Mature RAS and security features (TDX, SGX, total memory encryption).
Cons
- 350 W TDP requires robust cooling and raises power costs.
- Dual-socket NUMA topology needs OS and application tuning.
- Higher platform cost compared to previous-gen Xeons.
- No integrated graphics; not suitable for headless or light graphics workloads.
- Core count lags higher-tier SKUs like 6740P/6760P for highly parallel tasks.
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6731P
- AMD EPYC 9355 (32-core, 2S)Rival
2S Server / HPC
- AMD EPYC 9455 (48-core, 2S)Rival
2S Server / AI
- Intel Xeon 6741P (48-core, 1S)Rival
1S Server / Workstation
- Intel Xeon 6737P (32-core, higher clocks)Rival
1S Server / Workstation
- Intel Xeon 6787P (86-core, 1S/8S)Rival
High-core-count 1S/8S
48 cores and 288 MB L3 for workloads that can use more threads, same platform and feature set.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9355Alt
32-core EPYC with strong FP performance and 12-channel DDR5; good for 2S configurations.
- AMD EPYC 9455Alt
96 cores (2S) with high SPEC CPU2017 scores; better for heavily parallel workloads.
Similar core count with slightly higher clocks for workloads sensitive to frequency.
Compare head-to-headWhen you need many more cores and can accept higher power and cost.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Xeon 6732P
- AMD EPYC 9354Rival
Server (32-core, Genoa)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6745PRival
Server (32-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6737PRival
Server (32-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6740PRival
Server (48-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- AMD EPYC 9174FRival
Server (16-core, high-frequency Genoa)
64 cores for workloads that benefit more from raw core count than per-core frequency.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A well-balanced 32-core Granite Rapids-SP CPU that shines in 1S servers and workstations needing strong per-core performance, massive I/O, and built-in acceleration, though power efficiency lags newer process nodes.
Best for: Single-socket servers, storage appliances, and workstations needing high PCIe lane count and DDR5 bandwidth with moderate core count.
Read the full reviewA strong 32-core server CPU with excellent memory bandwidth and built-in AI acceleration, best suited for dual-socket enterprise and AI inference platforms where per-core performance matters more than raw core count.
Best for: Dual-socket enterprise servers running virtualization, databases, or CPU-based AI inference where per-core performance and memory bandwidth are critical.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6731P or Intel Xeon 6732P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6732P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6731P or Intel Xeon 6732P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6732P leads with a gaming performance score of 55/100 among Intel Xeon 6731P and Intel Xeon 6732P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6731P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6731P (245 W), Intel Xeon 6732P (350 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6731P and Intel Xeon 6732P use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Xeon 6731P: FCLGA4710 (LGA4710), Intel Xeon 6732P: FCLGA4710), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6732P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6732P (74,849). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.