CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6732P vs Intel Xeon 6737P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6732P is a 32-core, 64-thread server processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, featuring a 3.8 GHz base clock, up to 4.3 GHz turbo, 144 MB of L3 cache per socket, and 8-channel DDR5-6400 support, targeted at virtualized, database, AI inference, and general-purpose enterprise workloads in dual-socket platforms.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel AMX (BF16/INT8) and AVX-512 accelerate CPU-based inference.
- Well suited for small to medium LLMs, embedding models, and classic ML.
- Not a replacement for dedicated accelerators for large-scale training.
- Intel AMX with BF16/INT8 support accelerates deep learning inference
- Two AVX-512 FMA units per core benefit vectorized AI and HPC kernels
- No dedicated AI accelerator; heavy AI training still better suited to GPUs
Content Creation
Gaming
- No integrated graphics; requires discrete GPU.
- High single-thread clocks help some game servers, but platform is not optimized for gaming.
- GPU-bound game servers may still run well depending on title and configuration.
- Server processor not targeted at gaming
- No integrated graphics
- No official gaming benchmarks
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 32 high-frequency P-cores with strong per-core performance.
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 with MRDIMM support for high bandwidth.
- 144 MB L3 cache per socket improves working-set performance.
- Intel AMX and AVX-512 accelerate AI and HPC on CPU.
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for flexible I/O in dual-socket servers.
- Mature RAS and security features (TDX, SGX, total memory encryption).
Cons
- 350 W TDP requires robust cooling and raises power costs.
- Dual-socket NUMA topology needs OS and application tuning.
- Higher platform cost compared to previous-gen Xeons.
- No integrated graphics; not suitable for headless or light graphics workloads.
- Core count lags higher-tier SKUs like 6740P/6760P for highly parallel tasks.
Pros
- 32 high-performance P-cores with 4 GHz max turbo
- Intel AMX and dual AVX-512 FMA units for AI and HPC
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes with CXL 2.0 platform support
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 up to 4 TB per socket
- Rich accelerator set (QAT, DLB, DSA, IAA) offloads crypto, analytics, and streaming
- Granite Rapids-SP platform with UPI 2.0 for coherent dual-socket designs
Cons
- High 270 W TDP requires robust cooling and power design
- Platform and CPU cost are significant compared to previous-gen Xeons
- Locked multiplier limits enthusiast-style overclocking
- No integrated graphics; not suitable for headless or lightweight client use
- Full performance potential depends on server firmware and OS support for Speed Select and accelerators
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6732P
- AMD EPYC 9354Rival
Server (32-core, Genoa)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6745PRival
Server (32-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6737PRival
Server (32-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6740PRival
Server (48-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- AMD EPYC 9174FRival
Server (16-core, high-frequency Genoa)
64 cores for workloads that benefit more from raw core count than per-core frequency.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Xeon 6737P
- AMD EPYC 7573XRival
Server (32-core, Milan-X)
- AMD EPYC 9384XRival
Server (Genoa-X, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon Gold 6448YRival
Server (4th Gen Xeon Scalable, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon Gold 6438MRival
Server (4th Gen Xeon Scalable, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon 6730PRival
Server (Xeon 6700P, 32-core, lower turbo)
Same 32-core Granite Rapids-SP family with higher 4.2 GHz turbo for slightly better per-thread performance.
Compare head-to-headLower 2.5 GHz base and 245 W TDP for slightly better power efficiency at reduced peak clocks.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A strong 32-core server CPU with excellent memory bandwidth and built-in AI acceleration, best suited for dual-socket enterprise and AI inference platforms where per-core performance matters more than raw core count.
Best for: Dual-socket enterprise servers running virtualization, databases, or CPU-based AI inference where per-core performance and memory bandwidth are critical.
Read the full reviewA strong Xeon 6 P-core SKU for two-socket servers that need high per-core performance, AMX acceleration, and plenty of PCIe 5.0 connectivity, though its 270 W TDP and platform cost demand careful power and cooling planning.
Best for: Dual-socket servers running virtualization, in-memory databases, or mixed AI/HPC workloads that can leverage AMX and high PCIe 5.0 lane counts.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6732P or Intel Xeon 6737P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6732P leads with a gaming performance score of 55/100 among Intel Xeon 6732P and Intel Xeon 6737P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6737P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6732P (350 W), Intel Xeon 6737P (270 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6732P and Intel Xeon 6737P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6732P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6732P (74,849), Intel Xeon 6737P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.