CPU Comparison

Intel Xeon 6731P vs Intel Xeon 6787P

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6731P is a 32-core, 64-thread server and workstation processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, targeting single-socket platforms with 8-channel DDR5-6400, 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes, and built-in accelerators for AI, storage, and networking workloads.

Intel · Xeon 6
Intel Xeon 6731P
32C / 64T4.1 GHz245 W
8.6
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Xeon 6700P Series
Intel Xeon 6787P
86C / 172T3.8 GHz350 W
8.7
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
1S Server & Workstation
2S Server / HPC / Enterprise
Segment
Server / Workstation
Server / HPC / Enterprise
Generation
6th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable (Granite Rapids-SP)
6th Gen Xeon Scalable (Granite Rapids-SP)
Launched
2025
2025
Status
Launched
Launched
Codename
Granite Rapids-SP
Granite Rapids-SP
Series
Xeon 6
Xeon 6700P Series
Family
Intel Xeon 6 with P-Cores
Xeon 6
Predecessor
Intel Xeon Gold/Platinum 32-core 3rd/4th Gen Scalable CPUs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+
Successor
Platform ongoing (no direct end‑of‑line announced)

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
32
86
Threads
64
172
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
144 MB
336 MB
TDP
245 W
350 W
Architecture
Architecture
Granite Rapids-SP (Redwood Cove P-cores)
Granite Rapids-SP (Redwood Cove P-cores)
Process Node
Intel 3 (approx. 3 nm-class) compute dies with Intel 7 I/O dies
Intel 3
Memory
Memory Type
DDR5
DDR5 / MRDIMM
Memory Speed
DDR5-6400 MT/s (1DPC); DDR5-5200 MT/s (2DPC)
DDR5-6400; MRDIMM up to 8800 MT/s; max memory speed up to 8000 MT/s
Memory Channels
Octa (8)
Octa (8)
Max Memory
4096 GB
4096 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
FCLGA4710 (LGA4710)
FCLGA4710
PCIe Version
PCIe 5.0
5.0
PCIe Lanes
136
88
Integrated GPU
None
None
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Xeon 6731P
Intel Xeon 6787P95

Gaming

Intel Xeon 6731P
Intel Xeon 6787P50

Virtualization

Intel Xeon 6731P
Intel Xeon 6787P96

Efficiency

Intel Xeon 6731P
Intel Xeon 6787P70

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Xeon 6731PVery Good (CPU-based)
  • AMX and AVX-512 provide strong CPU-based AI inference and small-batch training
  • Not a replacement for dedicated GPUs or accelerators for large models
  • Well-suited for edge inference, analytics, and MLPerf inference workloads
Intel Xeon 6787PGood (CPU‑based AI)
  • AMX and DL Boost accelerate CPU‑side inference and low‑precision math
  • Best used as a complement to dedicated AI accelerators rather than a replacement

Content Creation

Intel Xeon 6731PGood
Blender CPU renderingV-Ray / Arnold CPU renderingHandBrake encodingCompiler workloadsScientific simulations
Intel Xeon 6787PVery Good (for multi‑threaded workloads)
Blender (CPU rendering)V-Ray / ArnoldHandBrake / FFmpeg (software encoding)Scientific simulation codesDatabase / analytics pipelines

Gaming

Intel Xeon 6731PNot applicable
  • Server-focused SKU without official gaming benchmarks
  • Single-threaded performance is strong, but gaming is not a target workload
  • Use desktop or consumer HEDT CPUs for gaming-focused builds
Intel Xeon 6787PNot applicable
  • Server-focused SKU with no integrated graphics
  • Can be paired with GPUs for GPU‑limited workloads, but client CPUs or specialized GPUs are better for pure gaming

Industry Impact

Gaming
Low
Negligible
Workstations
High
Moderate (mostly via Granite Rapids-WS derivatives)
Content Creation
Moderate
Limited (mostly in render farms and backend processing)
Virtualization
High
High

Best CPU by Use Case

Virtualization (Hyper-V, KVM, VMware)
Excellent
Database & Analytics (SQL Server, PostgreSQL, Spark)
Excellent
AI Inference & Lightweight Training
Very Good
Storage Appliances (NVMe-oF, HCI)
Excellent
Networking & Edge Appliances
Excellent
Large‑Scale Virtualization
Excellent
In‑Memory Databases
Excellent
HPC & Simulation
Excellent
AI Inference & Analytics
Very Good
General Enterprise Servers
Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Targeted
Targeted
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Students

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Xeon 6731P

Pros

  • 32 P-cores with strong per-core performance and AVX-512/AMX
  • 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes for dense NVMe/GPU configurations
  • 8-channel DDR5-6400 with up to 4 TB capacity
  • Integrated QAT/DLB/DSA/IAA accelerators for storage, networking, and analytics
  • 1S platform reduces board and licensing complexity

Cons

  • 245 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery
  • 1S-only; no multi-socket upgrade path
  • Not on the densest process node; some EPYC competitors are more power-efficient per core
  • No integrated graphics (typical for server CPUs)
  • Platform cost is high compared to mainstream desktop parts
Intel Xeon 6787P

Pros

  • 86 cores and 172 threads for massive parallelism
  • 8‑channel DDR5/MRDIMM with high bandwidth and capacity
  • 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes and CXL 2.0 for I/O‑heavy servers
  • Integrated QAT, DLB, DSA, IAA, AMX accelerators
  • Intel 3 process and Redwood Cove IPC gains vs prior Xeons

Cons

  • 350 W TDP requires robust cooling and power
  • High platform cost (CPU + DDR5/MRDIMM + platform)
  • Overkill for small business or light workloads
  • No integrated graphics and limited client‑use ecosystem
  • New platform; early BIOS/firmware maturity considerations

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Xeon 6731P

  • AMD EPYC 9355 (32-core, 2S)

    2S Server / HPC

    Rival
  • AMD EPYC 9455 (48-core, 2S)

    2S Server / AI

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon 6741P (48-core, 1S)

    1S Server / Workstation

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon 6737P (32-core, higher clocks)

    1S Server / Workstation

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon 6787P (86-core, 1S/8S)

    High-core-count 1S/8S

    Rival
  • 48 cores and 288 MB L3 for workloads that can use more threads, same platform and feature set.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD EPYC 9355
    Alt

    32-core EPYC with strong FP performance and 12-channel DDR5; good for 2S configurations.

  • AMD EPYC 9455
    Alt

    96 cores (2S) with high SPEC CPU2017 scores; better for heavily parallel workloads.

  • Similar core count with slightly higher clocks for workloads sensitive to frequency.

    Compare head-to-head
  • When you need many more cores and can accept higher power and cost.

    Compare head-to-head

Intel Xeon 6787P

  • AMD EPYC 9754 (Bergamo, 128 cores, 256 threads)

    Cloud‑optimized / High‑density server

    Rival
  • AMD EPYC 9005 series (Turin, up to 192 Zen 5 cores)

    High‑end server / AI / HPC

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon 6980P (128 cores, Granite Rapids‑AP)

    High‑core‑count server / HPC

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon 6780E (144 E‑cores, Sierra Forest)

    Scale‑out / Cloud‑native

    Rival
  • Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ (5th Gen, 64 cores)

    Previous‑gen enterprise server

    Rival
  • Fewer cores (64) but similar platform and lower price if 86 cores are not required.

    Compare head-to-head
  • Higher core count (128) for workloads that can leverage more threads in a single socket.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD EPYC 9754
    Alt

    Higher core density (128 Zen 4c cores) for cloud‑native workloads where TCO matters more than per‑core performance.

  • AMD EPYC 9005 series
    Alt

    Latest Zen 5/5c cores with higher IPC and core counts, strong alternative for new server deployments.

  • Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+
    Alt

    Lower‑cost 5th‑gen option with good performance if Granite Rapids features are not required.

Our Verdict on Each

Intel Xeon 6731PRecommended

A well-balanced 32-core Granite Rapids-SP CPU that shines in 1S servers and workstations needing strong per-core performance, massive I/O, and built-in acceleration, though power efficiency lags newer process nodes.

Best for: Single-socket servers, storage appliances, and workstations needing high PCIe lane count and DDR5 bandwidth with moderate core count.

Read the full review
Intel Xeon 6787PRecommended

An extremely powerful dual-socket server CPU with huge core counts, strong per-thread performance, and rich integrated acceleration, best suited for new data center builds where its platform cost and power can be justified.

Best for: New dual‑socket server builds for VM‑heavy, database, HPC, or AI inference where 86 cores and 8‑channel memory can be fully utilized.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Xeon 6731P or Intel Xeon 6787P?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6787P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6731P or Intel Xeon 6787P?

For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6787P leads with a gaming performance score of 50/100 among Intel Xeon 6731P and Intel Xeon 6787P.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Xeon 6731P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6731P (245 W), Intel Xeon 6787P (350 W).

Do Intel Xeon 6731P and Intel Xeon 6787P use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Xeon 6731P: FCLGA4710 (LGA4710), Intel Xeon 6787P: FCLGA4710), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which has more cores?

The Intel Xeon 6787P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6731P (32 cores), Intel Xeon 6787P (86 cores).

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Xeon 6787P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6787P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.