CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6731P vs Intel Xeon 6741P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6731P is a 32-core, 64-thread server and workstation processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, targeting single-socket platforms with 8-channel DDR5-6400, 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes, and built-in accelerators for AI, storage, and networking workloads.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- AMX and AVX-512 provide strong CPU-based AI inference and small-batch training
- Not a replacement for dedicated GPUs or accelerators for large models
- Well-suited for edge inference, analytics, and MLPerf inference workloads
- Intel AMX supported for matrix operations
- DL Boost on CPU for AI inference acceleration
- Suitable for CPU-based AI inference and some training workloads
Content Creation
Gaming
- Server-focused SKU without official gaming benchmarks
- Single-threaded performance is strong, but gaming is not a target workload
- Use desktop or consumer HEDT CPUs for gaming-focused builds
- No integrated graphics
- Designed for server/data center workloads
- Consumer platforms provide better gaming value
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 32 P-cores with strong per-core performance and AVX-512/AMX
- 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes for dense NVMe/GPU configurations
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 with up to 4 TB capacity
- Integrated QAT/DLB/DSA/IAA accelerators for storage, networking, and analytics
- 1S platform reduces board and licensing complexity
Cons
- 245 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery
- 1S-only; no multi-socket upgrade path
- Not on the densest process node; some EPYC competitors are more power-efficient per core
- No integrated graphics (typical for server CPUs)
- Platform cost is high compared to mainstream desktop parts
Pros
- High core and thread count for parallel server workloads
- Large 288 MB L3 cache
- Eight DDR5 channels with DDR5-6400 support
- 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes for extensive I/O
- Multiple on-die accelerators (AMX, DSA, DLB, IAA, QAT)
- Single-socket design simplifies platform layout
- ECC memory support for reliability
- VT-x/VT-d and RDT for virtualization and resource management
Cons
- 300 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery
- No integrated graphics
- Multiplier locked; not designed for enthusiast overclocking
- Higher cost relative to lower-end server SKUs
- Overkill for light workloads or consumer desktop use
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6731P
- AMD EPYC 9355 (32-core, 2S)Rival
2S Server / HPC
- AMD EPYC 9455 (48-core, 2S)Rival
2S Server / AI
- Intel Xeon 6741P (48-core, 1S)Rival
1S Server / Workstation
- Intel Xeon 6737P (32-core, higher clocks)Rival
1S Server / Workstation
- Intel Xeon 6787P (86-core, 1S/8S)Rival
High-core-count 1S/8S
48 cores and 288 MB L3 for workloads that can use more threads, same platform and feature set.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9355Alt
32-core EPYC with strong FP performance and 12-channel DDR5; good for 2S configurations.
- AMD EPYC 9455Alt
96 cores (2S) with high SPEC CPU2017 scores; better for heavily parallel workloads.
Similar core count with slightly higher clocks for workloads sensitive to frequency.
Compare head-to-headWhen you need many more cores and can accept higher power and cost.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Xeon 6741P
- AMD EPYC 8534P (Bergamo)Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9554 (Genoa)Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9754 (Bergamo)Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9354P (Genoa)Rival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6747PRival
Server
Lower core count and TDP if workloads are less thread-heavy.
Compare head-to-headDifferent core/TDP balance within the same Xeon 6700P family.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9354PAlt
Competing 32-core server CPU with high memory bandwidth and PCIe 5.0.
- AMD EPYC 9454PAlt
Higher core count competitor in similar power envelope.
Higher-end SKU in the same family for more demanding workloads.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A well-balanced 32-core Granite Rapids-SP CPU that shines in 1S servers and workstations needing strong per-core performance, massive I/O, and built-in acceleration, though power efficiency lags newer process nodes.
Best for: Single-socket servers, storage appliances, and workstations needing high PCIe lane count and DDR5 bandwidth with moderate core count.
Read the full reviewA capable single-socket server CPU with strong core counts and abundant I/O, well-suited for compute- and I/O-bound data center workloads, provided power and cooling are adequate.
Best for: Single-socket servers or workstations requiring high core count, large memory bandwidth, and many PCIe lanes for accelerators and NVMe storage.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6731P or Intel Xeon 6741P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6731P comes out ahead with a score of 8.6/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6731P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6731P (245 W), Intel Xeon 6741P (300 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6731P and Intel Xeon 6741P use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Xeon 6731P: FCLGA4710 (LGA4710), Intel Xeon 6741P: FCLGA4710), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6741P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6731P (32 cores), Intel Xeon 6741P (48 cores).