CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6732P vs Intel Xeon 6745P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6732P is a 32-core, 64-thread server processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, featuring a 3.8 GHz base clock, up to 4.3 GHz turbo, 144 MB of L3 cache per socket, and 8-channel DDR5-6400 support, targeted at virtualized, database, AI inference, and general-purpose enterprise workloads in dual-socket platforms.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel AMX (BF16/INT8) and AVX-512 accelerate CPU-based inference.
- Well suited for small to medium LLMs, embedding models, and classic ML.
- Not a replacement for dedicated accelerators for large-scale training.
- AMX and AVX-512 provide strong CPU-based AI inference
- Best suited for inference and mid-size models when GPUs are not used
- Large memory capacity benefits model serving and data preprocessing
Content Creation
Gaming
- No integrated graphics; requires discrete GPU.
- High single-thread clocks help some game servers, but platform is not optimized for gaming.
- GPU-bound game servers may still run well depending on title and configuration.
- Server-focused CPU without integrated graphics
- Gaming performance is not a design priority
- Frame rates will be sufficient but not class-leading compared to desktop CPUs
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 32 high-frequency P-cores with strong per-core performance.
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 with MRDIMM support for high bandwidth.
- 144 MB L3 cache per socket improves working-set performance.
- Intel AMX and AVX-512 accelerate AI and HPC on CPU.
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for flexible I/O in dual-socket servers.
- Mature RAS and security features (TDX, SGX, total memory encryption).
Cons
- 350 W TDP requires robust cooling and raises power costs.
- Dual-socket NUMA topology needs OS and application tuning.
- Higher platform cost compared to previous-gen Xeons.
- No integrated graphics; not suitable for headless or light graphics workloads.
- Core count lags higher-tier SKUs like 6740P/6760P for highly parallel tasks.
Pros
- 32 cores and 64 threads for high multi-threaded throughput
- 336 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large working sets
- Eight-channel DDR5-6400 with up to 4 TB capacity
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for substantial I/O expansion
- AMX and AVX-512 improve AI and HPC performance
- Mature server ecosystem with RAS features (SGX, TDX, QAT, etc.)
Cons
- 300 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery
- New LGA4710 platform forces a full server/platform refresh
- High platform cost relative to older Xeon generations
- Locked multiplier limits tuning flexibility
- Efficiency at light loads is not a strength
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6732P
- AMD EPYC 9354Rival
Server (32-core, Genoa)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6745PRival
Server (32-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6737PRival
Server (32-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6740PRival
Server (48-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- AMD EPYC 9174FRival
Server (16-core, high-frequency Genoa)
64 cores for workloads that benefit more from raw core count than per-core frequency.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Xeon 6745P
- Intel Xeon 6730PRival
Server / 32-core Granite Rapids-SP, 250 W TDP
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6731PRival
Server / 32-core Granite Rapids-SP, 245 W TDP
- AMD EPYC 9354Rival
Server / 32-core Genoa, DDR5-4800, 280 W TDP
- AMD EPYC 9374FRival
Server / 32-core Genoa, higher clocks, 320 W TDP
- AMD EPYC 9354PRival
Server / 32-core Genoa, single-socket optimized variant
Higher core-count (64-core) Granite Rapids-SP SKU when more threads are needed and TDP budget allows.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A strong 32-core server CPU with excellent memory bandwidth and built-in AI acceleration, best suited for dual-socket enterprise and AI inference platforms where per-core performance matters more than raw core count.
Best for: Dual-socket enterprise servers running virtualization, databases, or CPU-based AI inference where per-core performance and memory bandwidth are critical.
Read the full reviewA powerful 32-core Granite Rapids-SP CPU that excels in memory-bandwidth-sensitive and I/O-heavy server workloads, but its 300 W TDP and platform cost limit it to professional deployments where those features justify the investment.
Best for: Dual-socket servers or workstations running memory-intensive, I/O-heavy workloads such as large databases, virtualization, or AI inference where the 6745P’s cache and memory bandwidth justify the platform cost.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6732P or Intel Xeon 6745P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6732P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6732P or Intel Xeon 6745P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6732P leads with a gaming performance score of 55/100 among Intel Xeon 6732P and Intel Xeon 6745P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6745P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6732P (350 W), Intel Xeon 6745P (300 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6732P and Intel Xeon 6745P use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Xeon 6732P: FCLGA4710, Intel Xeon 6745P: FCLGA4710 (LGA4710)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6732P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6732P (74,849), Intel Xeon 6745P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.