CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6732P vs Intel Xeon 6748P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6732P is a 32-core, 64-thread server processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, featuring a 3.8 GHz base clock, up to 4.3 GHz turbo, 144 MB of L3 cache per socket, and 8-channel DDR5-6400 support, targeted at virtualized, database, AI inference, and general-purpose enterprise workloads in dual-socket platforms.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel AMX (BF16/INT8) and AVX-512 accelerate CPU-based inference.
- Well suited for small to medium LLMs, embedding models, and classic ML.
- Not a replacement for dedicated accelerators for large-scale training.
- AMX and DL Boost accelerate CPU‑based AI inference
- Well suited as an AI host node for GPU‑accelerated servers
- Not a replacement for dedicated AI accelerators for training
Content Creation
Gaming
- No integrated graphics; requires discrete GPU.
- High single-thread clocks help some game servers, but platform is not optimized for gaming.
- GPU-bound game servers may still run well depending on title and configuration.
- Designed for server and HPC workloads, not gaming
- High latency and core‑count‑optimized microarchitecture
- Modern desktop CPUs offer better gaming performance at far lower cost
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 32 high-frequency P-cores with strong per-core performance.
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 with MRDIMM support for high bandwidth.
- 144 MB L3 cache per socket improves working-set performance.
- Intel AMX and AVX-512 accelerate AI and HPC on CPU.
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for flexible I/O in dual-socket servers.
- Mature RAS and security features (TDX, SGX, total memory encryption).
Cons
- 350 W TDP requires robust cooling and raises power costs.
- Dual-socket NUMA topology needs OS and application tuning.
- Higher platform cost compared to previous-gen Xeons.
- No integrated graphics; not suitable for headless or light graphics workloads.
- Core count lags higher-tier SKUs like 6740P/6760P for highly parallel tasks.
Pros
- 48 cores and 96 threads for high multi‑threaded throughput
- 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 with MRDIMM support for bandwidth‑intensive workloads
- Up to 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes and CXL 2.0 for GPUs and accelerators
- Mature RAS and enterprise features from the Xeon Scalable lineage
- Good AI inference performance with AMX and DL Boost
Cons
- 300 W TDP requires robust cooling and increases platform power
- High platform cost (CPU, DDR5, server board) compared to lower‑core‑count options
- No integrated graphics; even basic VGA requires an add‑in card or BMC
- Locked multiplier with no official overclocking support
- Overkill for workloads that cannot saturate 48 cores and 8 memory channels
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6732P
- AMD EPYC 9354Rival
Server (32-core, Genoa)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6745PRival
Server (32-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6737PRival
Server (32-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6740PRival
Server (48-core, Granite Rapids-SP)
- AMD EPYC 9174FRival
Server (16-core, high-frequency Genoa)
64 cores for workloads that benefit more from raw core count than per-core frequency.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Xeon 6748P
- AMD EPYC 9454Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9554Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9654Rival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6781PRival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6760PRival
Server
Same core count with higher cache and slightly lower TDP if you need more L3 per core.
Compare head-to-headLower core count and TDP for less demanding server workloads with similar platform features.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Xeon 6900P seriesAlt
Higher‑core‑count Granite Rapids‑AP platform for those needing 72–128 cores per socket.
Our Verdict on Each
A strong 32-core server CPU with excellent memory bandwidth and built-in AI acceleration, best suited for dual-socket enterprise and AI inference platforms where per-core performance matters more than raw core count.
Best for: Dual-socket enterprise servers running virtualization, databases, or CPU-based AI inference where per-core performance and memory bandwidth are critical.
Read the full reviewA strong 48-core server CPU for multi-socket platforms that need high memory bandwidth and PCIe connectivity, but with a 300 W TDP and premium price that demand careful platform and cooling design.
Best for: Building or upgrading 2–8 socket servers for virtualization, databases, or HPC where high core count, memory bandwidth, and PCIe connectivity are critical and platform cost can be justified.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6732P or Intel Xeon 6748P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6732P leads with a gaming performance score of 55/100 among Intel Xeon 6732P and Intel Xeon 6748P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6748P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6732P (350 W), Intel Xeon 6748P (300 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6732P and Intel Xeon 6748P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6748P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6732P (32 cores), Intel Xeon 6748P (48 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6732P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6732P (74,849), Intel Xeon 6748P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.