CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6748P vs Intel Xeon 6760P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6748P is a 48-core, 96-thread server processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, designed for high-core-count, multi-socket enterprise and HPC workloads with 8-channel DDR5-6400 and up to 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- AMX and DL Boost accelerate CPU‑based AI inference
- Well suited as an AI host node for GPU‑accelerated servers
- Not a replacement for dedicated AI accelerators for training
- Intel AMX accelerates matrix operations common in AI inference and training.
- On-die accelerators such as DSA, IAA, DLB, and QAT offload data movement and compression tasks.
- Large memory capacity and bandwidth support larger models and datasets.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Designed for server and HPC workloads, not gaming
- High latency and core‑count‑optimized microarchitecture
- Modern desktop CPUs offer better gaming performance at far lower cost
- Xeon 6760P is a server processor without integrated graphics.
- Gaming performance is not a target use case.
- Running games requires a discrete GPU and appropriate platform support.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 48 cores and 96 threads for high multi‑threaded throughput
- 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 with MRDIMM support for bandwidth‑intensive workloads
- Up to 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes and CXL 2.0 for GPUs and accelerators
- Mature RAS and enterprise features from the Xeon Scalable lineage
- Good AI inference performance with AMX and DL Boost
Cons
- 300 W TDP requires robust cooling and increases platform power
- High platform cost (CPU, DDR5, server board) compared to lower‑core‑count options
- No integrated graphics; even basic VGA requires an add‑in card or BMC
- Locked multiplier with no official overclocking support
- Overkill for workloads that cannot saturate 48 cores and 8 memory channels
Pros
- 64 cores and 128 threads for high parallel throughput.
- 320 MB L3 cache reduces latency for memory-bound workloads.
- Eight DDR5 channels with support for 6400 MT/s.
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes enable extensive I/O configurations.
- Integrated accelerators (AMX, DSA, IAA, DLB, QAT) offload specialized tasks.
- Supports advanced security features such as Intel TDX and TME.
Cons
- 330 W TDP requires significant cooling and power delivery.
- No integrated graphics.
- Multiplier is locked, limiting enthusiast tuning.
- Requires enterprise-grade platforms and infrastructure.
- Two-socket scalability (2S) may not be necessary for all deployments.
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6748P
- AMD EPYC 9454Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9554Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9654Rival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6781PRival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6760PRival
Server
Same core count with higher cache and slightly lower TDP if you need more L3 per core.
Compare head-to-headLower core count and TDP for less demanding server workloads with similar platform features.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Xeon 6900P seriesAlt
Higher‑core‑count Granite Rapids‑AP platform for those needing 72–128 cores per socket.
Intel Xeon 6760P
- AMD EPYC 9755Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9754Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9684XRival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6980PRival
Server
- Intel Xeon 6700 seriesRival
Server
- Intel Xeon 6700P seriesAlt
Similar architecture with different core-count and TDP options to match workload needs.
- AMD EPYC 9004 seriesAlt
Alternative x86 server platforms with varied core counts and competitive performance-per-watt.
- AMD EPYC BergamoAlt
High core density for cloud-native workloads.
- Intel Xeon 5th Gen ScalableAlt
Existing platforms upgrading within the same ecosystem, albeit with older architecture.
Our Verdict on Each
A strong 48-core server CPU for multi-socket platforms that need high memory bandwidth and PCIe connectivity, but with a 300 W TDP and premium price that demand careful platform and cooling design.
Best for: Building or upgrading 2–8 socket servers for virtualization, databases, or HPC where high core count, memory bandwidth, and PCIe connectivity are critical and platform cost can be justified.
Read the full reviewThe Xeon 6760P delivers very high core counts and wide I/O for demanding server workloads, but its 330 W power envelope requires robust platform design and careful thermal planning.
Best for: Data center deployments requiring high core density, wide I/O, and accelerators for AI and analytics.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6748P or Intel Xeon 6760P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6748P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6748P or Intel Xeon 6760P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6748P leads with a gaming performance score of 40/100 among Intel Xeon 6748P and Intel Xeon 6760P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6748P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6748P (300 W), Intel Xeon 6760P (330 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6748P and Intel Xeon 6760P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6760P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6748P (48 cores), Intel Xeon 6760P (64 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6748P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6748P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.