CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6737P vs Intel Xeon 6738P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6737P is a 32-core, 64-thread server processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, offering 2.9 GHz base and 4 GHz turbo clocks, 144 MB of L3 cache, eight-channel DDR5-6400 memory, and 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes in a 270 W TDP envelope for dual-socket platforms.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel AMX with BF16/INT8 support accelerates deep learning inference
- Two AVX-512 FMA units per core benefit vectorized AI and HPC kernels
- No dedicated AI accelerator; heavy AI training still better suited to GPUs
- Intel AMX accelerates matrix operations for inference and some training workloads.
- Integrated DSA, IAA, DLB, and QAT offload data movement and crypto tasks common in AI pipelines.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Server processor not targeted at gaming
- No integrated graphics
- No official gaming benchmarks
- Xeon 6738P is a server/workstation processor without integrated graphics.
- Single-core performance is respectable but gaming workloads are not the target use case.
- Consumer platforms typically offer better price/performance for gaming.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 32 high-performance P-cores with 4 GHz max turbo
- Intel AMX and dual AVX-512 FMA units for AI and HPC
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes with CXL 2.0 platform support
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 up to 4 TB per socket
- Rich accelerator set (QAT, DLB, DSA, IAA) offloads crypto, analytics, and streaming
- Granite Rapids-SP platform with UPI 2.0 for coherent dual-socket designs
Cons
- High 270 W TDP requires robust cooling and power design
- Platform and CPU cost are significant compared to previous-gen Xeons
- Locked multiplier limits enthusiast-style overclocking
- No integrated graphics; not suitable for headless or lightweight client use
- Full performance potential depends on server firmware and OS support for Speed Select and accelerators
Pros
- 32 cores and 64 threads for high parallelism
- Large 144 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency
- Eight DDR5-6400 memory channels
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for extensive I/O
- Integrated accelerators: AMX, DSA, IAA, DLB, QAT
- Multi-socket scalability up to 8 sockets
Cons
- High 270 W TDP requires robust cooling
- No integrated graphics
- Not intended for consumer desktop or gaming
- Xeon platforms incur higher total cost of ownership
- Limited upgrade path beyond the Xeon 6 series
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6737P
- AMD EPYC 7573XRival
Server (32-core, Milan-X)
- AMD EPYC 9384XRival
Server (Genoa-X, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon Gold 6448YRival
Server (4th Gen Xeon Scalable, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon Gold 6438MRival
Server (4th Gen Xeon Scalable, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon 6730PRival
Server (Xeon 6700P, 32-core, lower turbo)
Same 32-core Granite Rapids-SP family with higher 4.2 GHz turbo for slightly better per-thread performance.
Compare head-to-headLower 2.5 GHz base and 245 W TDP for slightly better power efficiency at reduced peak clocks.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Xeon 6738P
- AMD EPYC 8324PRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9354PRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9454PRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9554Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9684XRival
Server
Slightly lower core count and TDP for smaller scale deployments.
Compare head-to-headMore balanced core count and power for moderate workloads.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9254Alt
24-core option for lower-power requirements.
Our Verdict on Each
A strong Xeon 6 P-core SKU for two-socket servers that need high per-core performance, AMX acceleration, and plenty of PCIe 5.0 connectivity, though its 270 W TDP and platform cost demand careful power and cooling planning.
Best for: Dual-socket servers running virtualization, in-memory databases, or mixed AI/HPC workloads that can leverage AMX and high PCIe 5.0 lane counts.
Read the full reviewA strong data center processor with high core count, large L3 cache, and accelerators for AI and analytics, provided you can accommodate its 270 W TDP and platform requirements.
Best for: Enterprise servers, multi-socket workstations, and cloud infrastructure requiring high memory bandwidth, I/O expansion, and built-in accelerators.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6737P or Intel Xeon 6738P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6737P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6737P or Intel Xeon 6738P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6737P leads with a gaming performance score of 0/100 among Intel Xeon 6737P and Intel Xeon 6738P.
Do Intel Xeon 6737P and Intel Xeon 6738P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6737P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6737P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.