CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6728P vs Intel Xeon 6738P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6728P is a 24-core, 48-thread server and workstation processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP platform, offering 144 MB of L3 cache, 8-channel DDR5-6400 memory, and 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes in a 210 W TDP envelope.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel AMX accelerates INT8 and BF16 matrix operations for deep learning inference.
- Good fit for CPU-based LLM inference and small-to-medium model serving.
- AI performance per core significantly better than pre-AMX Xeon generations.
- Intel AMX accelerates matrix operations for inference and some training workloads.
- Integrated DSA, IAA, DLB, and QAT offload data movement and crypto tasks common in AI pipelines.
Content Creation
Gaming
- No integrated graphics; discrete GPU required.
- High platform cost makes it unattractive for gaming versus consumer CPUs.
- Adequate for casual gaming but not a target use case.
- Xeon 6738P is a server/workstation processor without integrated graphics.
- Single-core performance is respectable but gaming workloads are not the target use case.
- Consumer platforms typically offer better price/performance for gaming.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 24 high-performance Redwood Cove P-cores with strong IPC.
- 144 MB L3 cache benefits latency-sensitive workloads.
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 with up to 4 TB per socket.
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for GPUs, NVMe, and networking.
- AMX and on-die accelerators (QAT, DLB, DSA, IAA) for AI and data processing.
- Supports 2S/4S/8S configurations for scalable enterprise deployments.
Cons
- High platform cost and 210 W TDP require robust cooling and power delivery.
- Locked multiplier; no overclocking headroom.
- No integrated graphics; must pair with discrete GPU or BMC.
- Memory and motherboard ecosystem are more expensive than consumer platforms.
- Less core-count density than higher-end Granite Rapids or EPYC 9004 SKUs.
Pros
- 32 cores and 64 threads for high parallelism
- Large 144 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency
- Eight DDR5-6400 memory channels
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for extensive I/O
- Integrated accelerators: AMX, DSA, IAA, DLB, QAT
- Multi-socket scalability up to 8 sockets
Cons
- High 270 W TDP requires robust cooling
- No integrated graphics
- Not intended for consumer desktop or gaming
- Xeon platforms incur higher total cost of ownership
- Limited upgrade path beyond the Xeon 6 series
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6728P
- AMD EPYC 9224 (24C/48T, Zen 4, SP5)Rival
Server / Workstation
- Intel Xeon 6521P (24C/48T, Granite Rapids-SP)Rival
Server / Workstation
- Intel Xeon 6731P (32C/64T, Granite Rapids-SP)Rival
Server / Workstation
- AMD EPYC 9124 (16C/32T, Zen 4, SP5)Rival
Server / Workstation
- Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 (40C/80T, Ice Lake-SP)Rival
Server / Workstation
Same 24C/48T Granite Rapids-SP family but lower TDP and price if you don’t need the full 210 W performance profile.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9224Alt
24-core Zen 4 server CPU with 12-channel DDR5 and competitive performance; better if you prioritize core count or prefer AMD’s platform.
Higher 32C/64T count within the same Granite Rapids-SP platform if you need more threads and can afford the higher TDP.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9124Alt
Lower-cost 16-core Zen 4 server CPU if your workload doesn’t require 24 cores and you want to reduce platform cost.
- Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 (used)Alt
Older 24-core Cascade Lake-SP part available on the used market at lower cost if you don’t need DDR5, PCIe 5.0, or AMX.
Intel Xeon 6738P
- AMD EPYC 8324PRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9354PRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9454PRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9554Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9684XRival
Server
Slightly lower core count and TDP for smaller scale deployments.
Compare head-to-headMore balanced core count and power for moderate workloads.
Compare head-to-head- AMD EPYC 9254Alt
24-core option for lower-power requirements.
Our Verdict on Each
A balanced Granite Rapids-SP SKU with strong per-core performance, large cache, and serious AI acceleration, best suited for memory-intensive and AI-augmented server workloads rather than cost-sensitive or purely throughput-oriented deployments.
Best for: Building or upgrading a 2S/4S server or workstation for AI inference, in-memory databases, or virtualization where 8-channel DDR5 and AMX are valuable.
Read the full reviewA strong data center processor with high core count, large L3 cache, and accelerators for AI and analytics, provided you can accommodate its 270 W TDP and platform requirements.
Best for: Enterprise servers, multi-socket workstations, and cloud infrastructure requiring high memory bandwidth, I/O expansion, and built-in accelerators.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6728P or Intel Xeon 6738P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6728P comes out ahead with a score of 8.6/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6728P or Intel Xeon 6738P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6728P leads with a gaming performance score of 60/100 among Intel Xeon 6728P and Intel Xeon 6738P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6728P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6728P (210 W), Intel Xeon 6738P (270 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6728P and Intel Xeon 6738P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6738P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6728P (24 cores), Intel Xeon 6738P (32 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6728P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6728P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.