CPU Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 5 325 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 365
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core Ultra 5 325 is an 8-core, 8-thread mainstream mobile SoC from Intel’s Panther Lake (Core Ultra Series 3) family, built on the Intel 18A process. It combines four Cougar Cove performance cores with four Darkmont low‑power efficient cores, 12 MB of shared Smart Cache, and an integrated 4‑core Xe3‑class GPU with 40 GPU TOPS and a 47 TOPS NPU, targeting thin‑and‑light AI PCs with a 25–55 W configurable TDP.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 47 TOPS NPU supports Windows Studio Effects and on‑device inference
- 40 TOPS GPU AI compute complements NPU for hybrid workloads
- Total CPU+GPU+NPU TOPS competitive for mainstream thin‑and‑light AI PCs
- 49 TOPS NPU5 enables local Copilot+ PC class experiences and efficient on‑device inference.
- Combined CPU + iGPU + NPU AI performance is competitive for client AI but not targeted at training or heavy server workloads.
Content Creation
Gaming
- 4‑core Xe3 iGPU suitable for 1080p low/medium in many titles
- Much faster than older 11th‑gen Xe but slower than 8‑core Xe or Arc B‑series iGPUs
- Best for light and casual gaming rather than high‑refresh or high‑detail AAA
- Xe3 4‑core iGPU significantly faster than older Iris Xe but slower than Arc 140V or higher Xe3 configurations.
- Suitable for 1080p low/medium settings in many titles; some modern AAA games will require reduced settings or FSR/XeSS.
- Better for e‑sports and casual titles than for high‑refresh competitive gaming.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Strong single‑thread and responsiveness for everyday tasks
- Meaningful AI compute with 47 TOPS NPU and 40 TOPS GPU
- Good efficiency on Intel 18A at 25 W base power
- Capable 4‑core Xe3 iGPU with AV1 and modern display outputs
- 12 MB Smart Cache improves gaming and threaded workloads
- Supports DDR5‑6400 and LPDDR5X‑7467 with up to 128 GB RAM
Cons
- Only 8 threads with no SMT; weaker in heavily threaded workloads than higher‑core SKUs
- Locked multiplier limits overclocking headroom
- 12 PCIe lanes may constrain expansion in some designs
- Only four P‑cores; not ideal for sustained all‑core workloads compared to 6+ core rivals
- OEM‑dependent GPU branding (Intel Graphics vs Arc) can be confusing
Pros
- Strong single‑thread performance for everyday tasks
- Intel 18A process delivers excellent efficiency at 15–25 W
- 49 TOPS NPU5 for local AI and Copilot+ PC features
- Xe3 iGPU with ray tracing and AV1 support is a big step over older Intel iGPUs
- Support for up to 128 GB LPDDR5X‑7467 or DDR5‑6400
- 12 PCIe 5.0 lanes for fast NVMe and peripherals
Cons
- Only 8 CPU threads; weaker multi‑core than 12–16 core H‑series chips
- No unlocked multiplier; no manual overclocking
- iGPU still slower than higher Xe3 configurations or Arc 140V
- Not intended for sustained high‑power workloads beyond 25 W PL1
- Early benchmarks show only modest gains versus prior Lunar Lake parts in some CPU tests
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core Ultra 5 325
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Rival
Mainstream Mobile AI APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 332Rival
Mainstream Mobile / Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 7 355Rival
Mainstream Mobile / Premium Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 322Rival
Entry-Level Mobile / Value
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840URival
Thin-and-Light Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 5 125HAlt
Older Meteor Lake part with 14 cores/18 threads; more threaded performance but lower efficiency and weaker NPU/GPU AI features.
Intel Core Ultra 7 365
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360Rival
Mobile / AI PC
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Rival
Mobile / AI PC
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258VRival
Mobile / AI PC
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 7 366HRival
Mobile / AI PC (H‑series)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 325Rival
Mobile / AI PC
Our Verdict on Each
A solid mainstream mobile SoC that delivers meaningful CPU and NPU upgrades over prior Ultra 5 generations, with good efficiency and capable integrated graphics—best for users who want AI features and balanced performance in a thin laptop rather than outright compute headroom.
Best for: Thin‑and‑light AI PC where you want strong efficiency, modern AI features, and better integrated graphics than older Ultra 5 chips, but don’t need the extra cores or GPU power of Core Ultra 7 or X7 SKUs.
Read the full reviewA balanced, efficient mobile SoC with strong single‑thread performance, a capable Xe3 iGPU, and serious NPU headroom for AI features, though multi‑core headroom is limited by its 8 cores and 25 W PL1 ceiling.
Best for: Thin‑and‑light business or premium consumer laptops where you want strong single‑thread performance, good efficiency, and modern AI capabilities without needing a discrete GPU.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 5 325 or Intel Core Ultra 7 365?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 5 325 leads with a gaming performance score of 78/100 among Intel Core Ultra 5 325 and Intel Core Ultra 7 365.
Do Intel Core Ultra 5 325 and Intel Core Ultra 7 365 use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCBGA2540 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.