CPU Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 5 322 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 325
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core Ultra 5 322 is a 6-core, 6-thread mainstream mobile processor from Intel’s Panther Lake (Core Ultra Series 3) family, built on the Intel 18A process and targeting thin-and-light laptops with configurable TDP from 25 W up to 55 W and integrated Intel Graphics plus a 46 TOPS NPU for AI workloads.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 46 TOPS NPU supports Windows Studio Effects and Copilot+ features.
- CPU and GPU also expose Intel DL Boost and OpenVINO/DirectML/WebNN.
- Not intended for training large models; focused on inference and AI‑enhanced experiences.
- 47 TOPS NPU supports Windows Studio Effects and on‑device inference
- 40 TOPS GPU AI compute complements NPU for hybrid workloads
- Total CPU+GPU+NPU TOPS competitive for mainstream thin‑and‑light AI PCs
Content Creation
Gaming
- 2 Xe3‑core iGPU is a step up from older UHD graphics but below Arc B390 / discrete GPUs.
- AV1 encode/decode is useful for streaming and video playback.
- Best suited for esports and older titles at 1080p medium; modern AAA titles may need low settings or FSR/DLSS equivalents.
- 4‑core Xe3 iGPU suitable for 1080p low/medium in many titles
- Much faster than older 11th‑gen Xe but slower than 8‑core Xe or Arc B‑series iGPUs
- Best for light and casual gaming rather than high‑refresh or high‑detail AAA
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 6‑core hybrid design balances performance and efficiency.
- Intel 18A process improves performance per watt for a modern mobile platform.
- 46 TOPS NPU enables Copilot+ and AI‑enhanced experiences.
- Integrated Intel Graphics with AV1 encode/decode and DP 2.1 / HDMI 2.1 outputs.
- Support for fast LPDDR5X and DDR5 memory.
- 12 PCIe lanes (Gen5 + Gen4) and Thunderbolt 4 provide modern I/O.
Cons
- Only 6 threads; weaker in heavily multi‑threaded workloads vs 8–12 core competitors.
- iGPU is entry‑level; not a replacement for discrete GPUs for serious gaming or heavy creative work.
- Locked multiplier; no manual overclocking headroom.
- Platform is new; long‑term software maturity is still developing.
- Higher‑end Panther Lake SKUs offer much more GPU and CPU performance for not much more money.
Pros
- Strong single‑thread and responsiveness for everyday tasks
- Meaningful AI compute with 47 TOPS NPU and 40 TOPS GPU
- Good efficiency on Intel 18A at 25 W base power
- Capable 4‑core Xe3 iGPU with AV1 and modern display outputs
- 12 MB Smart Cache improves gaming and threaded workloads
- Supports DDR5‑6400 and LPDDR5X‑7467 with up to 128 GB RAM
Cons
- Only 8 threads with no SMT; weaker in heavily threaded workloads than higher‑core SKUs
- Locked multiplier limits overclocking headroom
- 12 PCIe lanes may constrain expansion in some designs
- Only four P‑cores; not ideal for sustained all‑core workloads compared to 6+ core rivals
- OEM‑dependent GPU branding (Intel Graphics vs Arc) can be confusing
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core Ultra 5 322
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340Rival
Mainstream Mobile AI APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 332Rival
Mainstream Mobile (Same Generation)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 325Rival
Higher‑TDP Mainstream Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 8540URival
Thin‑and‑Light Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255HRival
Higher‑End Mainstream Mobile
Intel Core Ultra 5 325
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Rival
Mainstream Mobile AI APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 332Rival
Mainstream Mobile / Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 7 355Rival
Mainstream Mobile / Premium Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 322Rival
Entry-Level Mobile / Value
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840URival
Thin-and-Light Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 5 125HAlt
Older Meteor Lake part with 14 cores/18 threads; more threaded performance but lower efficiency and weaker NPU/GPU AI features.
Our Verdict on Each
A solid mainstream mobile CPU with a modern 18A process, capable integrated graphics, and strong AI acceleration for its power envelope, though 6 threads limit heavy multi-threaded workloads.
Best for: Thin‑and‑light or mainstream laptops where you want good efficiency, modern AI features, and integrated graphics capable of light gaming and AV1 media.
Read the full reviewA solid mainstream mobile SoC that delivers meaningful CPU and NPU upgrades over prior Ultra 5 generations, with good efficiency and capable integrated graphics—best for users who want AI features and balanced performance in a thin laptop rather than outright compute headroom.
Best for: Thin‑and‑light AI PC where you want strong efficiency, modern AI features, and better integrated graphics than older Ultra 5 chips, but don’t need the extra cores or GPU power of Core Ultra 7 or X7 SKUs.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 5 322 or Intel Core Ultra 5 325?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core Ultra 5 325 comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 5 322 or Intel Core Ultra 5 325?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 5 325 leads with a gaming performance score of 78/100 among Intel Core Ultra 5 322 and Intel Core Ultra 5 325.
Do Intel Core Ultra 5 322 and Intel Core Ultra 5 325 use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCBGA2540 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 325 has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (6 cores), Intel Core Ultra 5 325 (8 cores).