CPU Comparison

Core i7-10700F vs Intel Core i7-11700F

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-10700F is a desktop processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, released in April 2020. As a variant of the standard i7-10700, the 'F' suffix denotes the absence of integrated graphics, requiring a dedicated GPU for system operation. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, making it highly capable for multi-threaded workloads, gaming, and productivity tasks. Manufactured on Intel's refined 14nm process, it operates at a base clock of 2.9 GHz and can boost up to 4.8 GHz using Intel Turbo Boost 2.0. The processor fits the LGA 1200 socket and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory at 2933 MT/s. With a 65W base TDP, it offers a good balance of performance and thermals for mid-range desktop builds. While it lacks PCIe 4.0 support and the newer hybrid architecture of later generations, it remains a reliable performer for users who already own a dedicated graphics card.

Top pick
Intel · Core i7
Core i7-10700F
8C / 16T4.8 GHz65 W
8
Full review
Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-11700F
8C / 16T4.9 GHz65 W
7.5
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
Desktop
Generation
10th Generation Core i7
11th Generation
Launched
2020
2021
Status
Active
End-of-life
Codename
Comet Lake
Rocket Lake
Series
Core i7
Core i7
Family
10th Gen
Rocket Lake-S
Predecessor
Intel Core i7-9700F
Intel Core i7-10700F
Successor
Intel Core i7-11700F
Intel Core i7-12700F

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
8
8
Threads
16
16
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
16 MB
16 MB
TDP
65 W
65 W
Architecture
Architecture
Comet Lake
Rocket Lake
Process Node
14nm
14nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Speed
DDR4-2933
3200 MT/s
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
128 GB
128 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1200
PCIe Version
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0
PCIe Lanes
16
20
Integrated GPU
None
None
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Core i7-10700FBest88

16 threads handle multitasking and compiling code effortlessly.

Intel Core i7-11700F85

8 cores handle standard productivity and multi-threaded rendering tasks efficiently.

Gaming

Core i7-10700FBest90

Pairs well with GPUs up to RTX 3070/4070 for high-refresh-rate gaming.

Intel Core i7-11700F82

Performs well in modern titles, though slightly behind AMD's 5800X in heavily multi-threaded games.

Virtualization

Core i7-10700FBest85

8 cores make it highly capable for running multiple VMs.

Intel Core i7-11700F80

16 threads and AVX-512 make it a solid host for local virtual machines.

Efficiency

Core i7-10700F60

14nm process is less efficient than modern nodes, drawing significant power under boost.

Intel Core i7-11700F60

The 14nm process is power-hungry compared to competing 7nm AMD chips.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Core i7-10700FLimited
  • No DLBoost or NPU
  • Relies on discrete GPU for AI
  • CPU AI inference is slow
Intel Core i7-11700FModerate
  • AVX-512 support aids CPU-based AI tasks
  • No dedicated AI hardware

Content Creation

Core i7-10700FVery Good
Adobe Premiere ProBlenderOBS StudioUnity
Intel Core i7-11700FGood
Premiere ProBlenderOBS StudioUnreal Engine

Gaming

Core i7-10700FExcellent
  • Requires dedicated GPU
  • Strong single-core speeds
  • PCIe 3.0 may bottleneck top-tier GPUs slightly
Intel Core i7-11700FVery Good
  • Strong single-core boost clocks
  • PCIe 4.0 prevents GPU bottlenecks
  • Requires a dedicated GPU to function

Industry Impact

Gaming
High
Moderate
Workstations
Moderate
Moderate
Content Creation
Moderate
Moderate
Virtualization
Moderate
Low

Best CPU by Use Case

1440p Gaming
Excellent
Game Streaming
Very Good
Good
Software Development
Excellent
Very Good
Video Editing
Good
Good
3D Rendering
Good
1080p & 1440p Gaming
Very Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Targeted
Streamers
Targeted
Targeted
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Students
Targeted
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Core i7-10700F

Pros

  • 8 cores and 16 threads
  • Excellent gaming performance
  • 65W base TDP
  • Wide motherboard compatibility
  • Affordable in the used market

Cons

  • No integrated graphics
  • Locked multiplier
  • PCIe 3.0 only
  • 14nm process is power-hungry under load
Intel Core i7-11700F

Pros

  • Cheaper than the non-F variant
  • 8 cores and 16 threads
  • 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes
  • Solid 4.9 GHz boost clock

Cons

  • No integrated graphics (requires discrete GPU)
  • 14nm process runs hot under load
  • End-of-life LGA 1200 platform
  • Locked multiplier

Competitors & Alternatives

Core i7-10700F

Intel Core i7-11700F

Our Verdict on Each

Core i7-10700FRecommended

A solid 8-core desktop CPU that delivers excellent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance when paired with a dedicated GPU.

Best for: Upgrading an existing LGA 1200 system or building a budget gaming PC.

Read the full review

A solid 8-core CPU for users who already have a dedicated GPU, offering good value, though newer 12th gen chips perform significantly better.

Best for: Upgrading an existing LGA 1200 system on a budget.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Core i7-10700F or Intel Core i7-11700F?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-10700F comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Core i7-10700F or Intel Core i7-11700F?

For gaming, the Core i7-10700F leads with a gaming performance score of 90/100 among Core i7-10700F and Intel Core i7-11700F.

Do Core i7-10700F and Intel Core i7-11700F use the same socket?

Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1200 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Core i7-10700F posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Core i7-10700F (14,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.