CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-8020 vs Intel Core i3-8100
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-8020 is a highly obscure, cancelled 8th-generation desktop processor that was scheduled for an OEM release but never officially made it to the market.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
The lack of Hyper-Threading severely limits performance in heavily threaded office applications compared to newer 8-thread budget chips.
Gaming
Paired with a strong discrete GPU, it can still handle older eSports titles, but modern AAA games will be heavily CPU bottlenecked.
Virtualization
4 threads is the absolute minimum for running a modern OS and a single light virtual machine.
Efficiency
The 14nm process is power-hungry compared to modern 7nm or 5nm alternatives, drawing 65W for modest performance.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
No data
- No AI hardware acceleration
- Lacks AVX-512
- Far too slow for any practical AI inference
Content Creation
No data
Gaming
No data
- Requires a dedicated GPU for any gaming
- Fixed clock speed prevents single-thread boosts
- 4 cores are becoming the bare minimum for modern games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- None (Cancelled)
Cons
- Cancelled before market release
- No Hyper-Threading
- Fixed clock speed with no Turbo Boost
- DDR4-2400 memory speed limitation
- Obsolete architecture
Pros
- Historically significant for bringing 4 cores to the i3 tier
- Very cheap on the used market
- Low 65W TDP is easy to cool
- UHD 630 iGPU is sufficient for basic display tasks
- Stable, mature platform with abundant used motherboards
Cons
- No Hyper-Threading (4 cores, 4 threads only)
- No Turbo Boost (fixed 3.6 GHz clock)
- DDR4 memory speed artificially capped at 2400 MT/s
- Outdated 14nm architecture with poor efficiency
- Limited to PCIe 3.0
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-8020
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200GRival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 1200Rival
Budget Desktop
- Intel Pentium Gold G5400Rival
Entry Desktop
The actual released version of this generation's entry-level 4-core CPU.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
A much newer and faster budget APU with strong integrated graphics.
A massive upgrade that adds Hyper-Threading for 8 threads.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i3-8100
- AMD Ryzen 3 1200Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200GRival
Budget Desktop APU
- Intel Pentium Gold G5400Rival
Entry Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 1400Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-7400Rival
Previous Gen Mid-Range
A drop-in replacement (with a BIOS update) that adds Hyper-Threading for 8 threads and much higher clocks.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Alt
Offers SMT (8 threads) and a modern upgrade path to Ryzen 5000 series.
If staying on the exact same platform, the 8400 offers 6 cores for much better multitasking.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
A massively faster 12-thread CPU that redefines budget performance.
The current king of budget computing, offering IPC gains that make the 8100 look stationary.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
This processor was launched and subsequently cancelled. It cannot be purchased, reviewed, or used in modern systems.
Best for: There is no scenario where you can or should buy the Intel Core i3-8020. Because the processor was cancelled prior to mass distribution, finding a physical chip is virtually impossible outside of rare engineering samples. If you happen to encounter one, it would likely not function correctly on standard consumer motherboards due to potential microcode restrictions. Furthermore, even if it did work, a fixed 3.7 GHz clock speed on a 4-core, 4-thread architecture is drastically outdated by modern standards. Any current generation Ryzen 3 or Intel Core i3 would completely outclass it in every metric, including efficiency, single-core speed, and multi-core throughput. Do not spend money or time trying to acquire this silicon.
Read the full reviewA landmark chip in 2017 for bringing quad-core computing to the masses, but thoroughly outclassed by modern budget processors in every metric.
Best for: The only justifiable scenario for purchasing an Intel Core i3-8100 today is if you are repairing an existing LGA 1151 v2 system (like an office PC or a hand-me-down) and can find the CPU for under $20 on the used market. Even then, you must consider that the 8100 lacks Hyper-Threading, which severely limits its longevity in modern operating systems that are increasingly optimized for 8 or more threads. If you are building a new system, even the absolute cheapest new motherboard and CPU combo from AMD or Intel's 12th/13th gen will offer exponentially better performance, efficiency, and platform features like PCIe 4.0 or DDR5. Do not buy this CPU for gaming, as the lack of Turbo Boost and Hyper-Threading will cause severe stuttering in modern titles compared to a modern Ryzen 3.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-8020 or Intel Core i3-8100?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-8100 comes out ahead with a score of 4/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-8020 or Intel Core i3-8100?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-8100 leads with a gaming performance score of 30/100 among Intel Core i3-8020 and Intel Core i3-8100.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-8020 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-8020 (51 W), Intel Core i3-8100 (65 W).
Do Intel Core i3-8020 and Intel Core i3-8100 use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1151 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.