CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i3-8350K
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-10100 is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the 14nm Comet Lake architecture, bringing Hyper-Threading back to the desktop i3 tier with UHD Graphics 630 and a 65 W TDP.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Office work and web browsing are fast, but heavy multitasking will show the limitations of 4 cores.
Overclocking does not add threads. For heavily threaded productivity work, a stock 6-core CPU will easily beat an overclocked 4-core i3.
Gaming
Can handle 1080p gaming with a mid-range GPU, though it will bottleneck newer titles compared to 12th-gen alternatives.
At stock speeds, it is comparable to other 8th-gen i3s. When overclocked to 5.0 GHz+, it can match stock i5s in eSports titles, but the lack of threads hurts in modern AAA games.
Virtualization
Can run a single light VM, but 4 cores and 8 threads limit serious virtualization use.
4 threads is a hard limit for virtualization, regardless of how fast those threads run.
Efficiency
The 14nm process is less power-efficient than modern 10nm alternatives, drawing more power for less performance.
Terrible efficiency. Pushing 1.3V+ through 14nm silicon to hit 5.0 GHz results in massive power draw and heat.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI acceleration hardware
- Lacks AVX-512 support found on mobile Tiger Lake chips
- Not suitable for AI workloads
- No AI acceleration
- High clock speed cannot compensate for lack of AI instructions
Content Creation
Gaming
- Playable in older and e-sports titles with a dedicated GPU
- Will bottleneck GPUs above the GTX 1660 Super / RX 580 tier in modern games
- Lacks the single-thread speed of newer architectures
- Requires heavy overclocking to be relevant
- High clock speeds benefit older eSports titles
- 4 cores/4 threads is a severe limitation for modern AAA gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Hyper-Threading provides a usable 8-thread experience
- High 3.6 GHz base clock ensures sustained performance
- UHD 630 iGPU is reliable for basic display tasks
- Very easy to cool with a 65 W TDP
- LGA 1200 allows an upgrade path to 11th-gen parts
Cons
- Outdated 14nm manufacturing process
- Limited to DDR4-2666 memory speeds on this SKU
- Only supports PCIe 3.0, bottlenecking modern NVMe drives
- Small 6 MB L3 cache compared to modern chips
- Lacks AVX-512 instructions
Pros
- First unlocked i3, historic significance
- Massive overclocking headroom (5.0 GHz+ on air)
- 8MB L3 cache aids high-frequency stability
- Fun project chip for hardware enthusiasts
- High stock clock of 4.0 GHz
Cons
- No Hyper-Threading (4 cores, 4 threads only)
- Requires expensive Z-series motherboard
- Terrible power efficiency when overclocked
- Outperformed by cheaper locked 6-core CPUs
- Obsolete LGA 1151 v2 platform
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-10100
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 3300XRival
Mainstream Budget
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AFRival
Value AM4
- Intel Core i3-9100Rival
Previous-Gen Budget
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600Rival
Mid-Range AM4
A massive architectural upgrade for a similar price, offering PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 support.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500Alt
6 cores and 12 threads provide much better multi-threaded performance on the AM4 platform.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
Often available at a similar price point with 12 threads and superior multi-core performance.
A 6-core Comet Lake option that provides a much better upgrade path on the same LGA 1200 platform.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i3-10100FAlt
If you have a dedicated GPU, the F-variant saves money by removing the iGPU.
Intel Core i3-8350K
- AMD Ryzen 3 1300XRival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-8400Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- Intel Core i3-8350KRival
Budget Enthusiast
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
Offers 12 threads and modern platform features, destroying the 8350K in productivity and gaming for less total cost.
If you want to overclock on LGA 1151 v2, this gives you 6 cores to play with.
Compare head-to-headA modern budget king that doesn't need an expensive motherboard to perform well.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Alt
Offers 8 threads and PCIe 4.0 on a budget platform, making the 8350K obsolete.
Our Verdict on Each
The i3-10100 was a solid budget chip in 2020 thanks to the return of Hyper-Threading, but it is now outdated, held back by PCIe 3.0, DDR4-2666 limits, and an aging 14nm process.
Best for: The i3-10100 only makes sense today if you are upgrading an existing LGA 1200 system on an extremely tight budget and can find the chip used for a very low price. It can also be considered if you are repairing an office PC that already uses an LGA 1200 motherboard and you just need a drop-in replacement. However, for any new build, it is obsolete. The i3-12100 offers a massive architectural leap for a similar price, featuring PCIe 5.0, DDR5 support, and dramatically higher single-core performance. Avoid building a new system around the 10100 entirely.
Read the full reviewA fun overclocking toy in 2017, but the lack of Hyper-Threading and a high 91W TDP make it a poor value compared to even cheap modern chips.
Best for: You should avoid buying the Intel Core i3-8350K unless you are a dedicated overclocking hobbyist looking for a cheap project chip to practice manual tuning, delidding, or extreme cooling on. If you fall into that niche, buying a used 8350K for $20 and pushing it to 5.0 GHz can be incredibly fun and educational. However, for any practical use case—gaming, work, or productivity—this chip is a poor investment. It requires an expensive Z370 or Z390 motherboard to utilize its only feature (overclocking), yet a locked Ryzen 5 3600 on a cheap B450 board will destroy it in every multi-threaded benchmark while using less power. The lack of Hyper-Threading is a fatal flaw that no amount of frequency can fix. Spend your money on modern hardware.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-10100 or Intel Core i3-8350K?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-10100 comes out ahead with a score of 6.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-10100 or Intel Core i3-8350K?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-10100 leads with a gaming performance score of 60/100 among Intel Core i3-10100 and Intel Core i3-8350K.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-10100 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-10100 (65 W), Intel Core i3-8350K (91 W).
Do Intel Core i3-10100 and Intel Core i3-8350K use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i3-10100: LGA 1200, Intel Core i3-8350K: LGA 1151), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-10100 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-10100 (7,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.