CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i3-10105T
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-10100 is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the 14nm Comet Lake architecture, bringing Hyper-Threading back to the desktop i3 tier with UHD Graphics 630 and a 65 W TDP.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Office work and web browsing are fast, but heavy multitasking will show the limitations of 4 cores.
Handles basic office tasks fine, but heavy spreadsheets or multitasking will feel slower than standard 65 W chips.
Gaming
Can handle 1080p gaming with a mid-range GPU, though it will bottleneck newer titles compared to 12th-gen alternatives.
The low 3.0 GHz base clock and 3.9 GHz turbo severely limit gaming performance, even with a dedicated GPU.
Virtualization
Can run a single light VM, but 4 cores and 8 threads limit serious virtualization use.
4 threads can manage one lightweight VM, but the low power limit restricts performance.
Efficiency
The 14nm process is less power-efficient than modern 10nm alternatives, drawing more power for less performance.
Good efficiency for the 35 W power class, though the 14nm process is less efficient than modern 10nm alternatives.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI acceleration hardware
- Lacks AVX-512 support found on mobile Tiger Lake chips
- Not suitable for AI workloads
- No AI acceleration capabilities
- Insufficient performance for any practical AI workload
Content Creation
Gaming
- Playable in older and e-sports titles with a dedicated GPU
- Will bottleneck GPUs above the GTX 1660 Super / RX 580 tier in modern games
- Lacks the single-thread speed of newer architectures
- The low clock speeds create a significant bottleneck in modern games
- Only suitable for very old or lightweight 2D games
- A dedicated GPU would be heavily CPU-limited by this processor
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Hyper-Threading provides a usable 8-thread experience
- High 3.6 GHz base clock ensures sustained performance
- UHD 630 iGPU is reliable for basic display tasks
- Very easy to cool with a 65 W TDP
- LGA 1200 allows an upgrade path to 11th-gen parts
Cons
- Outdated 14nm manufacturing process
- Limited to DDR4-2666 memory speeds on this SKU
- Only supports PCIe 3.0, bottlenecking modern NVMe drives
- Small 6 MB L3 cache compared to modern chips
- Lacks AVX-512 instructions
Pros
- 35 W TDP enables very compact and quiet desktop designs
- Configurable down to 25 W for extreme thermal constraints
- Includes UHD Graphics 630 for basic display tasks
- Compatible with both 400 and 500 series motherboards
- 4 cores and 8 threads provide adequate basic multitasking
Cons
- Low 3.0 GHz base clock limits sustained performance
- High $134 launch price for a heavily downclocked chip
- Restricted to DDR4-2666 memory speeds
- Only PCIe 3.0 support
- 14nm process is outdated and less power-efficient than 10nm
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-10100
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 3300XRival
Mainstream Budget
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AFRival
Value AM4
- Intel Core i3-9100Rival
Previous-Gen Budget
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600Rival
Mid-Range AM4
A massive architectural upgrade for a similar price, offering PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 support.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500Alt
6 cores and 12 threads provide much better multi-threaded performance on the AM4 platform.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
Often available at a similar price point with 12 threads and superior multi-core performance.
A 6-core Comet Lake option that provides a much better upgrade path on the same LGA 1200 platform.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i3-10100FAlt
If you have a dedicated GPU, the F-variant saves money by removing the iGPU.
Intel Core i3-10105T
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GERival
Low-Power AM4
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-10100Rival
Standard Power i3
- Intel Pentium Gold G6600TRival
Low-Power Budget
- AMD Athlon 3000GERival
Ultra-Low Power AM4
A modern 35 W alternative offering PCIe 5.0, DDR5 support, and vastly superior single-core performance.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i5-10400TAlt
If you need more cores in a 35 W envelope, the 6-core 10400T is a better multitasker.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500Alt
If you can step up to 65 W, this 6-core processor offers dramatically better performance.
Our Verdict on Each
The i3-10100 was a solid budget chip in 2020 thanks to the return of Hyper-Threading, but it is now outdated, held back by PCIe 3.0, DDR4-2666 limits, and an aging 14nm process.
Best for: The i3-10100 only makes sense today if you are upgrading an existing LGA 1200 system on an extremely tight budget and can find the chip used for a very low price. It can also be considered if you are repairing an office PC that already uses an LGA 1200 motherboard and you just need a drop-in replacement. However, for any new build, it is obsolete. The i3-12100 offers a massive architectural leap for a similar price, featuring PCIe 5.0, DDR5 support, and dramatically higher single-core performance. Avoid building a new system around the 10100 entirely.
Read the full reviewThe i3-10105T offers adequate performance for basic tasks in a 35 W envelope, but its low clocks, DDR4-2666 limit, and PCIe 3.0 make it hard to recommend over modern low-power alternatives.
Best for: The i3-10105T should only be considered if you are repairing an existing SFF (Small Form Factor) office PC that requires a 35 W processor to match the chassis cooling capabilities. Its $134 launch price was difficult to justify even in 2021, as the standard i3-10100 cost less while offering significantly higher clock speeds. If you are building a new low-power system today, you should look toward 12th or 13th-gen 'T' variants which offer dramatically better performance per watt on a newer architecture. Avoid this chip for any new build, especially since it lacks modern features like PCIe 4.0 or DDR5 support.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-10100 or Intel Core i3-10105T?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-10100 comes out ahead with a score of 6.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-10100 or Intel Core i3-10105T?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-10100 leads with a gaming performance score of 60/100 among Intel Core i3-10100 and Intel Core i3-10105T.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-10105T has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-10100 (65 W), Intel Core i3-10105T (35 W).
Do Intel Core i3-10100 and Intel Core i3-10105T use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1200 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-10100 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-10100 (7,000), Intel Core i3-10105T (5,800). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.