CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4860EQ vs Intel Core i7-8700T
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4860EQ is a specialized mobile processor introduced in late August 2013 as part of the fourth-generation Core family, specifically utilizing the Crystalwell architecture. Designed primarily for embedded systems and high-performance mobile workstations, this BGA-packaged chip features four physical cores and eight threads, offering robust multitasking capabilities for its era. Operating at a base frequency of 1.8 GHz with the ability to boost up to 3.2 GHz, it balances power consumption with demanding workloads, fitting within a 47-watt thermal envelope. What sets this processor apart is the integration of Intel HD Graphics 5200, backed by a massive 128MB L4 eDRAM cache, drastically improving integrated graphics performance. With 8MB of L3 cache and support for DDR3 memory, it provided a compelling solution for compact devices requiring strong graphical output without a discrete GPU. Its active production status underscores its niche industrial applications.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles multi-threaded embedded applications effectively.
Handles heavy office workloads and multitasking smoothly.
Gaming
Capable of running older titles at 1080p via integrated graphics.
Good gaming performance when paired with a mid-range GPU.
Virtualization
Suitable for lightweight embedded virtualization.
Excellent for running multiple light VMs.
Efficiency
22nm process is outdated but reliable for fixed installations.
One of the most efficient hexa-core desktop chips of its era.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Lacks modern instruction sets
- No dedicated AI hardware
- CPU inference is decent due to 12 threads
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 5200 handles legacy games well
- Not suitable for modern AAA titles
- Best paired with GTX 1660 or RTX 3060 class GPUs
- Low base clock won't bottleneck as much due to high turbo
- Great for SFF gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 128MB L4 eDRAM boosts graphics
- Active production for embedded
- 8MB L3 cache
- Quad-core multi-threading
Cons
- BGA soldered, no upgrades
- Outdated 22nm process
- Low base clock
- Limited to DDR3
Pros
- Extremely low 35W TDP
- 6 cores and 12 threads
- High 4.0 GHz turbo boost
- Great for passive cooling
Cons
- Locked multiplier
- Lower base clock
- Hard to find retail
- 14nm process is outdated
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4860EQ
- AMD Embedded R-SeriesRival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-4700EQRival
Embedded
- Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3Rival
Workstation
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-4770TRival
Desktop
Newer Broadwell embedded part with better efficiency.
Compare head-to-headModern embedded alternative with vastly superior performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BAlt
Excellent modern alternative with Vega graphics.
- Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3Alt
If socketed server hardware is preferred.
Intel Core i7-8700T
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600ERival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-8670TRival
Low Power Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 7 2700ERival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-8500TRival
Low Power Desktop
- Intel Core i7-9700TRival
Low Power Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GEAlt
Much newer and more efficient.
- Intel Core i5-10400TAlt
Similar performance, newer generation.
If you have the cooling for 65W, it's much faster.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 4600GAlt
Better integrated graphics and IPC.
Our Verdict on Each
A highly capable embedded processor leveraging unique eDRAM technology to deliver reliable graphics and compute performance for long-life cycle applications.
Best for: Finding an Intel Core i7-4860EQ on the consumer market today is extremely rare, as it was never intended for standard DIY desktop builds or mainstream retail laptops. If you are sourcing replacement parts for an industrial system or repairing legacy embedded hardware, this processor provides excellent reliability and the unique advantage of HD 5200 graphics with eDRAM. For general consumers or modern system builders, investing in a 22nm Haswell-era chip makes little economic sense due to the lack of upgradeability and outdated platform features. Instead, seek modern alternatives with better efficiency. Purchase this only if maintaining an existing specialized system that explicitly requires the BGA 1364 socket and 47-watt thermal profile, as newer parts cannot be retrofitted into these proprietary embedded motherboard designs.
Read the full reviewAn outstanding 35W processor that doesn't compromise on core count, perfect for silent builds requiring strong multi-threaded capability.
Best for: Building a Small Form Factor (SFF) PC for silent operation.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4860EQ or Intel Core i7-8700T?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-8700T comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4860EQ or Intel Core i7-8700T?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-8700T leads with a gaming performance score of 65/100 among Intel Core i7-4860EQ and Intel Core i7-8700T.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-8700T has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-4860EQ (47 W), Intel Core i7-8700T (35 W).
Do Intel Core i7-4860EQ and Intel Core i7-8700T use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-4860EQ: Intel BGA 1364, Intel Core i7-8700T: Intel Socket 1151), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i7-8700T has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i7-4860EQ (4 cores), Intel Core i7-8700T (6 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-8700T posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4860EQ (7,800), Intel Core i7-8700T (13,500). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.