CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4860EQ vs Intel Core i7-5775R
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4860EQ is a specialized mobile processor introduced in late August 2013 as part of the fourth-generation Core family, specifically utilizing the Crystalwell architecture. Designed primarily for embedded systems and high-performance mobile workstations, this BGA-packaged chip features four physical cores and eight threads, offering robust multitasking capabilities for its era. Operating at a base frequency of 1.8 GHz with the ability to boost up to 3.2 GHz, it balances power consumption with demanding workloads, fitting within a 47-watt thermal envelope. What sets this processor apart is the integration of Intel HD Graphics 5200, backed by a massive 128MB L4 eDRAM cache, drastically improving integrated graphics performance. With 8MB of L3 cache and support for DDR3 memory, it provided a compelling solution for compact devices requiring strong graphical output without a discrete GPU. Its active production status underscores its niche industrial applications.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles multi-threaded embedded applications effectively.
4 cores and high IPC handle office tasks effortlessly.
Gaming
Capable of running older titles at 1080p via integrated graphics.
Iris Pro 6200 can handle older or eSports titles at 720p/1080p Low.
Virtualization
Suitable for lightweight embedded virtualization.
Capable of light VMs, but limited by 65W TDP.
Efficiency
22nm process is outdated but reliable for fixed installations.
14nm process makes it incredibly power-efficient.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Lacks modern instruction sets
- No AI hardware
- eDRAM helps slightly with CPU inference
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 5200 handles legacy games well
- Not suitable for modern AAA titles
- Iris Pro 6200 was great for integrated graphics
- Can play older AAA games at low settings
- Not suitable for modern AAA titles
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 128MB L4 eDRAM boosts graphics
- Active production for embedded
- 8MB L3 cache
- Quad-core multi-threading
Cons
- BGA soldered, no upgrades
- Outdated 22nm process
- Low base clock
- Limited to DDR3
Pros
- Powerful Iris Pro 6200 graphics
- 128 MB L4 eDRAM
- Highly efficient 14nm process
- Good CPU performance
Cons
- Soldered to motherboard (BGA)
- Locked multiplier
- Only supports DDR3
- Hard to find standalone
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4860EQ
- AMD Embedded R-SeriesRival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-4700EQRival
Embedded
- Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3Rival
Workstation
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-4770TRival
Desktop
Newer Broadwell embedded part with better efficiency.
Compare head-to-headModern embedded alternative with vastly superior performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BAlt
Excellent modern alternative with Vega graphics.
- Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3Alt
If socketed server hardware is preferred.
Intel Core i7-5775R
- AMD A10-7890KRival
Desktop APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4770RRival
Desktop BGA
- AMD A10-7870KRival
Desktop APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-5675RRival
Desktop BGA
- Intel Core i7-4790SRival
Desktop
Socketed version for DIY builders.
Compare head-to-headSuccessor with better CPU IPC and DDR4.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GAlt
Modern APU with vastly superior integrated graphics.
- Intel Core i5-12400Alt
Modern alternative with much better CPU performance.
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700GAlt
8-core APU for compact builds.
Our Verdict on Each
A highly capable embedded processor leveraging unique eDRAM technology to deliver reliable graphics and compute performance for long-life cycle applications.
Best for: Finding an Intel Core i7-4860EQ on the consumer market today is extremely rare, as it was never intended for standard DIY desktop builds or mainstream retail laptops. If you are sourcing replacement parts for an industrial system or repairing legacy embedded hardware, this processor provides excellent reliability and the unique advantage of HD 5200 graphics with eDRAM. For general consumers or modern system builders, investing in a 22nm Haswell-era chip makes little economic sense due to the lack of upgradeability and outdated platform features. Instead, seek modern alternatives with better efficiency. Purchase this only if maintaining an existing specialized system that explicitly requires the BGA 1364 socket and 47-watt thermal profile, as newer parts cannot be retrofitted into these proprietary embedded motherboard designs.
Read the full reviewA revolutionary processor for integrated graphics, bringing Iris Pro 6200 to compact form factors, though its BGA nature limits DIY appeal.
Best for: Purchasing a used AIO or NUC for basic office work or media consumption.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4860EQ or Intel Core i7-5775R?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-5775R comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4860EQ or Intel Core i7-5775R?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4860EQ leads with a gaming performance score of 60/100 among Intel Core i7-4860EQ and Intel Core i7-5775R.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-4860EQ has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-4860EQ (47 W), Intel Core i7-5775R (65 W).
Do Intel Core i7-4860EQ and Intel Core i7-5775R use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1364 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4860EQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4860EQ (7,800), Intel Core i7-5775R (7,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.