CPU Comparison
Apple M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. Apple M4 is an ARM-based system-on-chip built on TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process, pairing up to 10 CPU cores (4 performance + 6 efficiency) with up to a 10-core GPU, a 16-core Neural Engine, and a new display engine. It introduces hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shading to iPad and Mac, and adds AV1 decode in the media engine, targeting high-performance, power-efficient workloads across tablets, laptops, and desktops.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Very fast single-thread performance and strong multi-core scaling within its power envelope, suitable for demanding productivity workloads on macOS and iPadOS.
14 threads provide solid multi-tasking performance for productivity applications, though limited by 28W base power.
Gaming
Arc 140T handles esports titles comfortably and can manage older AAA games at lowered settings, but is not a replacement for a discrete GPU.
Virtualization
Adequate for light VM workloads, but 14 threads and thermal constraints limit heavy virtualization use cases.
Efficiency
High performance-per-watt; Apple claims the same performance as M2 using roughly half the power in tested workloads, and M4 devices typically run cool and quiet.
LP-E-cores significantly improve idle and light-load efficiency, making this chip well-suited for battery-conscious designs.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16-core Neural Engine delivers up to 38 TOPS for on-device AI.
- Next-generation ML accelerators are integrated into both performance and efficiency CPU cores.
- Hardware-accelerated AI features in OS and apps (e.g., Live Captions, subject isolation) benefit from the NPU and unified memory bandwidth.
- Combined GPU and NPU resources make M4 well suited for client-side inference and media AI workloads.
- NPU 3 provides 13 TOPS for sustained AI tasks
- Arc 140T GPU contributes 74 TOPS for burst AI workloads
- Combined 94 TOPS meets Copilot+ PC requirements
- Local LLM inference is feasible for smaller models
Content Creation
Gaming
- The integrated GPU supports modern features like hardware ray tracing and mesh shading.
- On macOS, gaming performance is constrained by title availability and reliance on translation/emulation layers.
- Playability in AAA titles at 1080p is generally limited to low or medium settings on the base M4.
- M4 iPad Pro focuses more on high-end creative and pro apps than AAA gaming libraries.
- Arc 140T is substantially faster than desktop Xe-LPG variants
- Esports titles run well at 1080p medium settings
- AAA gaming requires lowered settings and is framerate-limited
- Driver maturity for Arc mobile graphics is still improving
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Industry-leading performance-per-watt in thin-and-light devices.
- Strong single-core performance and fast responsiveness.
- 16-core Neural Engine with high TOPS for on-device AI.
- Hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shading in the GPU.
- Media engine with AV1 decode for efficient streaming.
- Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and high-bandwidth unified memory on Mac implementations.
- Fanless implementations (e.g., iPad Pro) stay cool and quiet under typical use.
Cons
- Apple does not publish clock speeds, TDP, or detailed cache specs.
- Unified memory is not expandable beyond the configured capacity at purchase.
- No traditional socket or user-accessible PCIe lanes for add-in cards.
- Gaming on macOS remains constrained by software compatibility.
- Some configurations implement fewer CPU or GPU cores (e.g., 8- or 9-core CPU variants).
Pros
- Tri-cluster design enables excellent power efficiency at light loads
- Arc Graphics 140T is the most powerful iGPU in the Arrow Lake mobile family
- 94 TOPS combined AI performance meets modern AI PC standards
- LPDDR5X-8400 support provides exceptional memory bandwidth for an iGPU
- NPU 3 enables sustained AI workloads without draining battery
Cons
- 28W base TDP limits sustained multi-core performance
- No Hyper-Threading reduces per-core multitasking flexibility
- Tri-cluster scheduling complexity may cause inconsistent performance in poorly optimized software
- BGA package means no upgrade path
- Arc mobile graphics drivers still maturing compared to established alternatives
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M4
- Compare head-to-headApple M3Rival
SoC
- Compare head-to-headApple M4 ProRival
SoC
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
SoC
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Rival
Mobile CPU
- Intel Core Ultra 7 155HRival
Mobile CPU
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Rival
Mobile Thin-and-Light
- AMD Ryzen 7 8845HSRival
Mobile Performance
- Compare head-to-headApple M4Rival
Mobile Premium
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
Mobile AI PC
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 360Rival
Mobile Mid-Range AI
Lower cost option with fewer cores if budget is a concern.
Compare head-to-headMore P-cores and higher clocks for demanding mobile workloads.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (Desktop)Alt
If a desktop form factor is acceptable, offers sustained performance advantages.
Our Verdict on Each
The M4 raises the bar for efficiency and single-thread performance while delivering stronger multi-core scaling and a much more capable Neural Engine. It is an excellent fit for iPad Pro and Mac users who want fast, cool, and quiet operation, but platform constraints on some devices and the absence of expandable memory/PCIe remain trade-offs.
Best for: Buying an iPad Pro for creative pro workflows, or a compact Mac (Mac mini/iMac) for efficient everyday performance and light-to-medium content creation.
Read the full reviewA capable mobile processor that delivers strong multi-threaded performance and the best integrated graphics in the Arrow Lake family, though the tri-cluster core layout adds complexity that software must fully exploit.
Best for: Purchasing a thin-and-light laptop that needs strong iGPU performance and AI capabilities without a discrete GPU
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M4 or Intel Core Ultra 5 235H?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M4 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M4 or Intel Core Ultra 5 235H?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H leads with a gaming performance score of 75/100 among Apple M4 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (28 W).
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M4 (10 cores), Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (14 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Apple M4 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M4 (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.