CPU Comparison
Apple M2 Pro vs Intel Core i7-13700H
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Apple M2 Pro is a high-performance ARM-based system-on-chip (SoC) with up to a 12-core CPU and 19-core GPU, built on a second‑generation 5 nm process. It powers the 2023 MacBook Pro 14/16 and Mac mini, offering up to 32 GB of unified memory with 200 GB/s bandwidth and strong efficiency for creative and pro workloads.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Very strong multi‑threaded performance for compile, encode, and heavy multitasking workloads, with excellent responsiveness in pro apps.
Easily handles 4K video editing and heavy multi-tasking.
Gaming
Capable of playable to smooth frame rates in modern titles at 1440p–4K with medium–high settings, but not a replacement for a high‑end discrete GPU in the most demanding AAA games.
Provides high frame rates when paired with RTX 4050/4060 mobile GPUs.
Virtualization
Good for running multiple VMs and containers, though memory is capped at 32 GB and Apple’s virtualization stack is still evolving.
Adequate for light VM usage on the go.
Efficiency
Outstanding performance per watt; MacBook Pro 14/16 with M2 Pro deliver long battery life and sustained performance under load.
Excellent power scaling for battery life during light tasks.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16‑core Neural Engine 提供约 15.8 TOPS INT8 算力，适合本地推理和轻量训练
- 没有专用的超大矩阵加速器，大规模训练仍需外接 GPU/云
- Core ML 和 ONNX 推理在 M2 Pro 上表现良好
- Good CPU inference capabilities.
- Integrated GPU can assist with light AI workloads via OpenVINO.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Rarely bottlenecks mobile GPUs up to RTX 4070.
- Intel Thread Director ensures smooth background task management.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Strong CPU performance per core and per watt
- Up to 19‑core integrated GPU with ProRes acceleration
- 200 GB/s unified memory with up to 32 GB capacity
- Excellent efficiency and battery life in MacBook Pro designs
- Hardware‑accelerated ProRes, HEVC, H.264 media engines
- Robust Thunderbolt 4 / USB4 connectivity
Cons
- Max unified memory limited to 32 GB
- No support for external discrete GPUs on Macs (only eGPU via Thunderbolt)
- No traditional PCIe slot or CPU socket – SoC is soldered and not user‑upgradable
- GPU still not competitive with high‑end discrete laptop GPUs for heavy 3D/ML
- Limited low‑level control over power and clocking compared to x86 platforms
Pros
- Excellent single-threaded performance
- Great hybrid core balance for mobile
- Supports fast LPDDR5 memory
- Integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics
- PCIe 5.0 support for storage
Cons
- BGA socket means it cannot be upgraded
- Thermal throttling is common in thin laptops
- 115W turbo power is hard to sustain on battery
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M2 Pro
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7‑13700HRival
High‑Performance Laptop CPU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9‑13900HRival
High‑Performance Laptop CPU
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSRival
High‑Performance Laptop CPU
- AMD Ryzen 9 7845HXRival
High‑Performance Laptop CPU
- Compare head-to-headApple M1 ProRival
Previous‑Gen Pro SoC
- Alt
If you need more GPU cores and up to 96 GB unified memory for heavy 3D or large models.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
Newer architecture with better efficiency and some architectural improvements, though with a different core mix.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core i7‑13700H / i9‑13900H laptopAlt
For users who prefer x86 Windows laptops with strong multi‑core performance and more traditional PCIe layout.
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS / 7845HX laptopAlt
Good alternative in Windows laptops with high multi‑thread performance and more flexible memory/GPU options.
- Mac Studio (M1 Max / M2 Max)Alt
If you want a desktop form factor with more GPU performance and memory, and don’t need portability.
Intel Core i7-13700H
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-13900HRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M2 ProRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-13500HRival
Mobile
Slightly higher clocks if you want a bit more peak performance.
Compare head-to-headFor desktop-replacement laptops needing true 16-core power.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
M2 Pro delivers a meaningful generational leap over M1 Pro in CPU and GPU performance, with much better efficiency and media engines, making it one of the best choices for creators and developers who don’t need the full M2 Max.
Best for: Creators and developers who want a power‑efficient, high‑performance laptop or mini desktop with strong CPU/GPU and unified memory, but don’t need the extreme GPU or 64–96 GB memory of M2 Max.
Read the full reviewAn excellent mobile CPU that offers a perfect sweet spot of clock speeds and core counts for premium thin-and-light laptops.
Best for: Purchasing a thin-and-light gaming or creator laptop.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M2 Pro or Intel Core i7-13700H?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M2 Pro comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M2 Pro or Intel Core i7-13700H?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-13700H leads with a gaming performance score of 85/100 among Apple M2 Pro and Intel Core i7-13700H.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-13700H has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-13700H (45 W).
Do Apple M2 Pro and Intel Core i7-13700H use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Apple M2 Pro: BGA‑soldered (on‑board SoC), Intel Core i7-13700H: Intel BGA 1744), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i7-13700H has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M2 Pro (12 cores), Intel Core i7-13700H (14 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-13700H posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M2 Pro (11,500), Intel Core i7-13700H (32,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.