CPU Comparison
Apple M1 Pro vs Apple M2 Pro
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. Apple M1 Pro is a 5nm ARM-based SoC with 8 performance and 2 efficiency CPU cores, up to a 16-core GPU, a 16-core Neural Engine, and up to 32GB unified memory with 200GB/s bandwidth, designed for pro laptops.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16-core Neural Engine accelerates on-device ML tasks in apps and frameworks.
- Apple advertises 11 TOPS INT8 for M1-series Neural Engines.
- CPU and GPU also contribute to ML workloads via optimized libraries.
- 16‑core Neural Engine 提供约 15.8 TOPS INT8 算力，适合本地推理和轻量训练
- 没有专用的超大矩阵加速器，大规模训练仍需外接 GPU/云
- Core ML 和 ONNX 推理在 M2 Pro 上表现良好
Content Creation
Gaming
- Integrated GPU provides playable performance in many games but is not comparable to midrange dedicated GPUs.
- Limited macOS game catalog impacts practical gaming utility.
- Apple Silicon adoption improves performance in supported titles over time.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Strong multi-core CPU and GPU performance in a power-efficient design.
- Excellent battery life for a pro laptop.
- Up to 32GB unified memory with high bandwidth.
- Integrated media engines with ProRes accelerators for video workflows.
- Thunderbolt 4/USB4 built into the SoC.
Cons
- RAM is not upgradable; unified memory is fixed at purchase.
- Gaming performance lags behind midrange dedicated GPUs.
- No official socket or user-configurable PCIe lanes.
- Apple does not publish TDP or official clock specifications.
- macOS-only for direct use; no boot-to-Windows support on Apple Silicon.
Pros
- Strong CPU performance per core and per watt
- Up to 19‑core integrated GPU with ProRes acceleration
- 200 GB/s unified memory with up to 32 GB capacity
- Excellent efficiency and battery life in MacBook Pro designs
- Hardware‑accelerated ProRes, HEVC, H.264 media engines
- Robust Thunderbolt 4 / USB4 connectivity
Cons
- Max unified memory limited to 32 GB
- No support for external discrete GPUs on Macs (only eGPU via Thunderbolt)
- No traditional PCIe slot or CPU socket – SoC is soldered and not user‑upgradable
- GPU still not competitive with high‑end discrete laptop GPUs for heavy 3D/ML
- Limited low‑level control over power and clocking compared to x86 platforms
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M1 Pro
- Intel Core i7-11800HRival
High-performance laptop
- Intel Core i7-12700HRival
High-performance laptop
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXRival
High-performance laptop
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HXRival
High-performance laptop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-11980HKRival
Enthusiast laptop
- Alt
Newer generation with higher performance and improved efficiency in the same MacBook Pro form factors.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
More GPU cores and memory bandwidth for GPU-heavy workloads.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core i7-13700HAlt
x86 compatibility for Windows-centric workflows.
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAlt
Strong x86 efficiency and integrated graphics for Windows laptops.
- Alt
Newer architecture with updated CPU and GPU for non-Pro users.
Compare head-to-head
Apple M2 Pro
- Intel Core i7‑13700HRival
High‑Performance Laptop CPU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9‑13900HRival
High‑Performance Laptop CPU
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSRival
High‑Performance Laptop CPU
- AMD Ryzen 9 7845HXRival
High‑Performance Laptop CPU
- Compare head-to-headApple M1 ProRival
Previous‑Gen Pro SoC
- Alt
If you need more GPU cores and up to 96 GB unified memory for heavy 3D or large models.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
Newer architecture with better efficiency and some architectural improvements, though with a different core mix.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core i7‑13700H / i9‑13900H laptopAlt
For users who prefer x86 Windows laptops with strong multi‑core performance and more traditional PCIe layout.
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS / 7845HX laptopAlt
Good alternative in Windows laptops with high multi‑thread performance and more flexible memory/GPU options.
- Mac Studio (M1 Max / M2 Max)Alt
If you want a desktop form factor with more GPU performance and memory, and don’t need portability.
Our Verdict on Each
M1 Pro delivers outstanding performance per watt and strong multi-core throughput for pro workloads, with highly efficient operation and excellent battery life, making it a compelling choice for creators who do not need x86.
Best for: Creator or developer needing sustained performance and battery life in a MacBook Pro (14 or 16, 2021) who can work within macOS.
Read the full reviewM2 Pro delivers a meaningful generational leap over M1 Pro in CPU and GPU performance, with much better efficiency and media engines, making it one of the best choices for creators and developers who don’t need the full M2 Max.
Best for: Creators and developers who want a power‑efficient, high‑performance laptop or mini desktop with strong CPU/GPU and unified memory, but don’t need the extreme GPU or 64–96 GB memory of M2 Max.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M1 Pro or Apple M2 Pro?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M1 Pro comes out ahead with a score of 9/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M1 Pro or Apple M2 Pro?
For gaming, the Apple M2 Pro leads with a gaming performance score of 78/100 among Apple M1 Pro and Apple M2 Pro.
Which has more cores?
The Apple M2 Pro has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M1 Pro (10 cores), Apple M2 Pro (12 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Apple M2 Pro posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M2 Pro (11,500). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.