CPU Comparison
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i3-1000NG4
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Apple M1 is an 8-core ARM-based system-on-a-chip (SoC) that marked Apple’s transition from Intel to its own Apple Silicon for the Mac, combining four high‑performance and four efficiency cores, an 8‑core integrated GPU, and a 16‑core Neural Engine on a 5 nm process.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Very responsive for everyday tasks, Xcode builds, and light creative work; benefits from fast single‑core and SSD, but heavy multi‑thread workloads are constrained by 8 threads.
Adequate for lightweight office work on older macOS versions, but modern updates have made it feel sluggish.
Gaming
Competent for 1080p gaming in macOS and via Rosetta 2 for many titles, but the 8‑core GPU and 8–16 GB memory limit modern AAA performance and resolution scaling.
The 48EU Iris Plus can handle very light casual games, but Macs are not gaming devices and this CPU limits even Mac-specific titles.
Virtualization
Capable for a couple of light VMs, but not ideal for large parallel VM farms due to core count and memory ceiling.
Running Windows via Boot Camp or virtualization is possible but painfully slow with only 4 threads.
Efficiency
Outstanding performance per watt; MacBook Air and 13‑inch MacBook Pro with M1 delivered dramatically better battery life and lower heat than comparable Intel Macs.
Excellent efficiency for an x86 chip, though it was immediately overshadowed by the ARM-based M1's efficiency.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16‑core Neural Engine accelerates Core ML models
- CPU and GPU also provide ML accelerators for framework‑level ops
- Not designed for large‑scale training or server‑side inference
- DLBoost is present but largely unused in the macOS ecosystem of that era
Content Creation
Gaming
- 8‑core GPU comparable to low‑end discrete GPUs of its era in some Metal titles
- Rosetta 2 adds overhead for x86 games; some titles have compatibility or performance quirks
- 16 GB memory limit and 8 GPU cores cap texture resolutions and frame rates in modern AAA games
- MacBook Airs are not gaming devices
- The CPU will bottleneck even lightweight games running via Rosetta or ports
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Excellent single‑thread performance and responsiveness
- Outstanding performance per watt and battery life
- Integrated GPU much faster than old Intel UHD/Iris in Macs
- Unified memory simplifies development and improves efficiency
- Silent, fanless operation in MacBook Air and Mac mini under light loads
- Strong on‑device ML inference via Neural Engine
Cons
- Only 8 CPU threads; heavy multi‑thread workloads can hit a ceiling
- Max 16 GB unified memory; not user‑upgradeable
- No eGPU support and limited PCIe expansion
- Rosetta 2 translation layer for some x86 apps; not all software is native
- Newer M2/M3 chips and modern x86 CPUs offer more cores, higher clocks, and better GPU performance
Pros
- Historically significant as one of Apple's final custom Intel chips
- 48EU Iris Plus offers decent legacy graphics performance for macOS
- Very low power draw results in a quiet, cool MacBook Air
- Capable of running Intel-only legacy software
Cons
- Only 2 CPU cores make modern macOS feel incredibly slow
- Instantly obsolete upon the announcement of the Apple M1
- Cannot be upgraded to future macOS versions that drop Intel support
- Limited to PCIe 3.0 speeds
- Poor value on the used market compared to M1 Macs
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M1
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Rival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800URival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-1135G7Rival
Thin‑and‑Light Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 5 4600HRival
Performance Laptop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-11800HRival
High‑Performance Laptop
- Alt
Same platform with ~18% faster CPU, 35% faster GPU, and support for up to 24 GB unified memory.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
More CPU/GPU cores and higher memory bandwidth for heavier creative workloads.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 7 6800UAlt
Modern x86 laptop CPU with higher multi‑thread performance and DDR5 memory.
Higher core count and better sustained multi‑thread performance in thin laptops.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Newer architecture with better GPU and CPU performance per watt and improved media engines.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Custom ARM Laptop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-1000G4Rival
Standard Ice Lake-Y
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200URival
Budget Windows Laptop
- Intel Core i5-8210YRival
Previous-Gen MacBook Air
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cxRival
Always Connected PC
- Apple M1 MacBook AirAlt
Offers 5x the CPU performance, 8x the GPU performance, and double the battery life for a similar or lower price.
- Apple M2 MacBook AirAlt
The modern baseline for Apple laptops, offering incredible performance per watt.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500U LaptopAlt
A modern Windows alternative with 6 cores and 12 threads.
- Intel Core i5-1135G7 LaptopAlt
A vastly superior Intel ultrabook experience with 4 cores and Iris Xe graphics.
Our Verdict on Each
A landmark chip that delivered class‑leading efficiency and single‑thread speed for thin laptops, still very capable for most users but increasingly outdated compared to M2/M3 and modern x86 rivals in multi‑thread and GPU workloads.
Best for: Used or refurbished M1 MacBook Air / Mac mini for general use, study, or light creative work at a low price
Read the full reviewA fascinating piece of silicon history due to its Apple exclusivity and 48EU GPU, but entirely outclassed by the Apple M1 that replaced it just months after its release.
Best for: The only reason to acquire an i3-1000NG4 MacBook Air today is for vintage Apple hardware collection, or if you require an Intel-based Mac specifically to run legacy 32-bit macOS software or older audio production plugins that are not compatible with Apple Silicon. If you find one for under $150, it can serve as a dedicated typing machine or basic web browser for a child.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M1 or Intel Core i3-1000NG4?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M1 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M1 or Intel Core i3-1000NG4?
For gaming, the Apple M1 leads with a gaming performance score of 72/100 among Apple M1 and Intel Core i3-1000NG4.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-1000NG4 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-1000NG4 (9 W).
Do Apple M1 and Intel Core i3-1000NG4 use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Apple M1: On-package (BGA-style, not user-replaceable), Intel Core i3-1000NG4: BGA 1044), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Apple M1 has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M1 (8 cores), Intel Core i3-1000NG4 (2 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Apple M1 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M1 (7,404), Intel Core i3-1000NG4 (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.