CPU Comparison

Apple M1 vs Intel Core i5-1030NG7

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Apple M1 is an 8-core ARM-based system-on-a-chip (SoC) that marked Apple’s transition from Intel to its own Apple Silicon for the Mac, combining four high‑performance and four efficiency cores, an 8‑core integrated GPU, and a 16‑core Neural Engine on a 5 nm process.

Top pick
Apple · Apple M series
Apple M1
8C / 8T
8.8
Full review
Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-1030NG7
4C / 8T3.5 GHz10 W
7.5
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Apple
Intel
Market
Consumer / Prosumer Laptops and Desktops
Mobile
Segment
Mobile / Desktop SoC (entry–mid-range Mac)
Mobile (Custom)
Generation
1st Gen Apple Silicon (M1 family)
10th Gen (Ice Lake-Y)
Launched
2020
2020
Status
Discontinued in new Macs (replaced by M2/M3; M1 Macs largely off new market by early 2024)
End-of-life
Codename
Firestorm (performance) + Icestorm (efficiency)
Ice Lake-Y
Series
Apple M series
Core i5
Family
Apple M1
10th Generation Core i5
Predecessor
Intel Macs (U‑series and Y‑series CPUs)
Intel Core i5-8210Y
Successor
Apple M2 (announced June 2022)
Apple M1

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
8
4
Threads
8
8
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
6 MB
TDP
10 W
Architecture
Architecture
ARMv8.4-A (Apple Firestorm + Icestorm big.LITTLE-style)
Ice Lake-Y (Sunny Cove)
Process Node
5 nm (TSMC N5)
10nm
Memory
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
LPDDR4
Memory Speed
4267 MT/s
LPDDR4-3733
Memory Channels
Octa (8)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
16 GB
16 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
On-package (BGA-style, not user-replaceable)
Intel BGA 1044
PCIe Version
Gen 3.0
PCIe Lanes
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Apple M1Best88

Very responsive for everyday tasks, Xcode builds, and light creative work; benefits from fast single‑core and SSD, but heavy multi‑thread workloads are constrained by 8 threads.

Intel Core i5-1030NG785

Very snappy for everyday macOS tasks and light Xcode compiles.

Gaming

Apple M1Best72

Competent for 1080p gaming in macOS and via Rosetta 2 for many titles, but the 8‑core GPU and 8–16 GB memory limit modern AAA performance and resolution scaling.

Intel Core i5-1030NG755

Capable of running macOS games and older titles at 720p/1080p.

Virtualization

Apple M1Best68

Capable for a couple of light VMs, but not ideal for large parallel VM farms due to core count and memory ceiling.

Intel Core i5-1030NG765

Handles light VMs well, but thermal limits apply.

Efficiency

Apple M1Best95

Outstanding performance per watt; MacBook Air and 13‑inch MacBook Pro with M1 delivered dramatically better battery life and lower heat than comparable Intel Macs.

Intel Core i5-1030NG792

10nm process ensures excellent battery life in the MacBook Air.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Apple M1Good for on‑device inference
  • 16‑core Neural Engine accelerates Core ML models
  • CPU and GPU also provide ML accelerators for framework‑level ops
  • Not designed for large‑scale training or server‑side inference
Intel Core i5-1030NG7Fair
  • Supports AVX-512 and DLBoost
  • CPU-based AI inference is decent

Content Creation

Apple M1Good for light-to-medium workloads
Adobe Premiere Pro (1080p–2K timelines)DaVinci Resolve (HD–2K, basic color grading)Xcode and Swift developmentBlender (small scenes, viewport rendering)Logic Pro and audio production
Intel Core i5-1030NG7Very Good
PhotoshopLightroomFinal Cut Pro (1080p)Logic Pro

Gaming

Apple M1Good for casual and older titles
  • 8‑core GPU comparable to low‑end discrete GPUs of its era in some Metal titles
  • Rosetta 2 adds overhead for x86 games; some titles have compatibility or performance quirks
  • 16 GB memory limit and 8 GPU cores cap texture resolutions and frame rates in modern AAA games
Intel Core i5-1030NG7Good
  • 64EU Iris Plus graphics
  • Good for light Steam games on macOS
  • Throttles under heavy graphical load

Industry Impact

Gaming
Moderate – pushed Windows OEMs to prioritize efficiency and integrated GPU performance in thin laptops, but M1’s gaming impact is limited by macOS software and GPU power.
Low
Workstations
High – demonstrated that ARM SoCs could compete with x86 in content creation and pro workloads at lower power, influencing subsequent Apple Silicon Pro/Max and ARM server efforts.
Low
Content Creation
High – made 4K video editing and photo editing accessible in thin, quiet laptops, changing expectations for what “ultrabook‑class” devices could do.
Moderate
Virtualization
Moderate – showed efficient VMs on ARM laptops, but x86 server and cloud ecosystems still dominate.
Low

Best CPU by Use Case

Web, Office and Study
Excellent
Coding and Development
Very Good
1080p–2K Video Editing
Good
Light 3D and Creative Apps
Good
Multi‑VM / Heavy Server Workloads
Limited
Office Productivity
Excellent
Media Playback
Excellent
Light Photo Editing
Very Good
Web Browsing
Excellent
Casual Gaming
Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Streamers
Targeted
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Apple M1

Pros

  • Excellent single‑thread performance and responsiveness
  • Outstanding performance per watt and battery life
  • Integrated GPU much faster than old Intel UHD/Iris in Macs
  • Unified memory simplifies development and improves efficiency
  • Silent, fanless operation in MacBook Air and Mac mini under light loads
  • Strong on‑device ML inference via Neural Engine

Cons

  • Only 8 CPU threads; heavy multi‑thread workloads can hit a ceiling
  • Max 16 GB unified memory; not user‑upgradeable
  • No eGPU support and limited PCIe expansion
  • Rosetta 2 translation layer for some x86 apps; not all software is native
  • Newer M2/M3 chips and modern x86 CPUs offer more cores, higher clocks, and better GPU performance
Intel Core i5-1030NG7

Pros

  • Excellent integrated graphics for an Intel Mac
  • Good 10nm efficiency
  • Custom tuned for MacBook Air thermals
  • Supports AVX-512

Cons

  • Only available in a discontinued MacBook model
  • Replaced quickly by the vastly superior Apple M1
  • Thermal throttling under heavy loads
  • Limited to 16GB of RAM in the host device

Competitors & Alternatives

Apple M1

Intel Core i5-1030NG7

Our Verdict on Each

Apple M1Recommended

A landmark chip that delivered class‑leading efficiency and single‑thread speed for thin laptops, still very capable for most users but increasingly outdated compared to M2/M3 and modern x86 rivals in multi‑thread and GPU workloads.

Best for: Used or refurbished M1 MacBook Air / Mac mini for general use, study, or light creative work at a low price

Read the full review

A custom Intel chip for Apple that brought excellent graphics and efficiency to the 2020 MacBook Air, though soon replaced by Apple Silicon.

Best for: Buying a used 2020 Intel MacBook Air for specific legacy macOS software.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Apple M1 or Intel Core i5-1030NG7?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M1 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Apple M1 or Intel Core i5-1030NG7?

For gaming, the Apple M1 leads with a gaming performance score of 72/100 among Apple M1 and Intel Core i5-1030NG7.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i5-1030NG7 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-1030NG7 (10 W).

Do Apple M1 and Intel Core i5-1030NG7 use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Apple M1: On-package (BGA-style, not user-replaceable), Intel Core i5-1030NG7: Intel BGA 1044), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which has more cores?

The Apple M1 has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M1 (8 cores), Intel Core i5-1030NG7 (4 cores).

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Apple M1 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M1 (7,404), Intel Core i5-1030NG7 (6,200). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.