CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6767P vs Intel Xeon 6774P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6767P is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built for high-performance data center and AI workloads, featuring DDR5/MRDIMM support and 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes on the Intel 3 process.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Intel claims meaningful performance-per-watt improvements over prior-generation Xeons for AI workloads such as Stable Diffusion BS1 INT8 and vLLM inference using the Xeon 6767P.
- AMX accelerators provide hardware support for matrix operations used in many AI models.
- On-die accelerators like DSA and IAA help with data movement and analytics tasks common in AI pipelines.
- Intel AMX provides dedicated INT8/BF16/FP16 matrix acceleration per core.
- Well‑suited to CPU‑based inference for LLMs, vision transformers, and recommendation models.
- Best when paired with GPUs for large‑scale training, but can handle moderate inference workloads alone.
Content Creation
Gaming
- This is a server processor without integrated graphics, not intended or validated for consumer gaming.
- Gaming performance is not a relevant evaluation metric for this SKU.
- Not designed for gaming; low single‑thread optimization vs desktop CPUs.
- High latency mesh and server‑tuned memory timings hurt game responsiveness.
- Only consider if server is also used for light gaming on the side.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 64 P-cores and 128 threads for parallel server workloads.
- 336 MB of L3 cache.
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for high-speed I/O and GPU attach.
- 8-channel DDR5/MRDIMM with up to 4 TB support.
- On-die accelerators (AMX, DSA, IAA, DLB, QAT) for specialized offload.
- Intel 3 process targeting improved performance and efficiency.
- Dual-socket scalability via four UPI links at 24 GT/s.
Cons
- 350 W TDP demands robust cooling and power delivery.
- No integrated graphics.
- Requires server platforms supporting FCLGA4710 and appropriate memory.
- High cost typical of high-end server CPUs.
- Overkill for light or thread-limited workloads.
Pros
- 64 P‑cores with AMX for strong AI and HPC performance.
- 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes in single‑socket R1S mode for GPU and NVMe expansion.
- 8‑channel DDR5/MRDIMM with up to 8800 MT/s speed and 4 TB capacity.
- Large 336 MB L3 cache and 128 MB L2 cache reduce memory bottlenecks.
- Rich set of integrated accelerators (QAT, DLB, DSA, IAA) and RAS features.
- Well‑suited to single‑NUMA‑domain designs, reducing software complexity.
Cons
- High 350 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery.
- Premium price point (Intel RCP ~$7,571) limits use to high‑end deployments.
- Locked multiplier and server‑oriented turbo behavior limit enthusiast tuning.
- No integrated graphics; not suitable for headless workstation or desktop use.
- Platform and motherboard ecosystem is still maturing compared to older Xeon generations.
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6767P
- AMD EPYC 9754 (Bergamo)Rival
Server/Cloud
- AMD EPYC 9684X (Genoa-X)Rival
Server/HPC
- AMD EPYC 9575FRival
Server (High Frequency)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6768PRival
Server/Data Center
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6760PRival
Server/Data Center
- AMD EPYC 9754Alt
High core density with E-cores for throughput-oriented cloud workloads.
- AMD EPYC 9684XAlt
Large 3D V-Cache L3 for capacity-sensitive HPC and database workloads.
Intel Xeon 6774P
- AMD EPYC 9654Rival
High‑core‑count Server / AI
- AMD EPYC 9554Rival
Balanced Server / AI
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6781PRival
Higher‑core‑count (80‑core) Xeon 6700P
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6761PRival
Same‑core‑count Xeon 6700P sibling
- Intel Xeon w9‑3495X (Sapphire Rapids‑WS)Rival
Workstation‑class Xeon with similar I/O emphasis
- Intel Xeon w7‑2475X (Sapphire Rapids‑WS)Alt
Better fit for workstation users needing moderate core counts with integrated graphics and more desktop‑oriented platforms.
- AMD EPYC 9475FAlt
Higher‑frequency 48‑core option with strong per‑core performance and good I/O, suitable where 64 cores are underutilized.
Slightly lower base clock but similar feature set and potentially better availability in some channels.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A high-end Xeon 6 P-core part built for scale-up and scale-out servers requiring strong per-core performance, very high core count, and abundant I/O for GPUs and accelerators. Its 350 W TDP demands serious platform design and cooling, but the combination of Intel 3, large shared cache, DDR5/MRDIMM up to 8000 MT/s, and on-die accelerators (AMX, QAT, DSA, IAA, DLB) makes it a compelling choice for AI and HPC.
Best for: Deploying scale-up or scale-out servers for AI, HPC, or high-throughput database workloads where core count, memory bandwidth, and PCIe 5.0 I/O are critical.
Read the full reviewA high‑core‑count, I/O‑rich server CPU ideal for single‑socket AI and HPC systems, though its 350 W TDP and premium price demand careful platform and cooling design.
Best for: Single‑socket AI factories, HPC servers, and in‑memory database appliances that can leverage 136 PCIe 5.0 lanes and 8‑channel DDR5/MRDIMM bandwidth.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6767P or Intel Xeon 6774P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6767P comes out ahead with a score of 9/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6767P or Intel Xeon 6774P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6774P leads with a gaming performance score of 40/100 among Intel Xeon 6767P and Intel Xeon 6774P.
Do Intel Xeon 6767P and Intel Xeon 6774P use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Xeon 6767P: FCLGA4710, Intel Xeon 6774P: FCLGA4710 (LGA4710)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.