CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6745P vs Intel Xeon 6748P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6745P is a 32-core, 64-thread server and workstation processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, featuring 336 MB of L3 cache, eight-channel DDR5-6400 memory, and 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes in a 300 W TDP envelope.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- AMX and AVX-512 provide strong CPU-based AI inference
- Best suited for inference and mid-size models when GPUs are not used
- Large memory capacity benefits model serving and data preprocessing
- AMX and DL Boost accelerate CPU‑based AI inference
- Well suited as an AI host node for GPU‑accelerated servers
- Not a replacement for dedicated AI accelerators for training
Content Creation
Gaming
- Server-focused CPU without integrated graphics
- Gaming performance is not a design priority
- Frame rates will be sufficient but not class-leading compared to desktop CPUs
- Designed for server and HPC workloads, not gaming
- High latency and core‑count‑optimized microarchitecture
- Modern desktop CPUs offer better gaming performance at far lower cost
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 32 cores and 64 threads for high multi-threaded throughput
- 336 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large working sets
- Eight-channel DDR5-6400 with up to 4 TB capacity
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for substantial I/O expansion
- AMX and AVX-512 improve AI and HPC performance
- Mature server ecosystem with RAS features (SGX, TDX, QAT, etc.)
Cons
- 300 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery
- New LGA4710 platform forces a full server/platform refresh
- High platform cost relative to older Xeon generations
- Locked multiplier limits tuning flexibility
- Efficiency at light loads is not a strength
Pros
- 48 cores and 96 threads for high multi‑threaded throughput
- 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 with MRDIMM support for bandwidth‑intensive workloads
- Up to 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes and CXL 2.0 for GPUs and accelerators
- Mature RAS and enterprise features from the Xeon Scalable lineage
- Good AI inference performance with AMX and DL Boost
Cons
- 300 W TDP requires robust cooling and increases platform power
- High platform cost (CPU, DDR5, server board) compared to lower‑core‑count options
- No integrated graphics; even basic VGA requires an add‑in card or BMC
- Locked multiplier with no official overclocking support
- Overkill for workloads that cannot saturate 48 cores and 8 memory channels
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6745P
- Intel Xeon 6730PRival
Server / 32-core Granite Rapids-SP, 250 W TDP
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6731PRival
Server / 32-core Granite Rapids-SP, 245 W TDP
- AMD EPYC 9354Rival
Server / 32-core Genoa, DDR5-4800, 280 W TDP
- AMD EPYC 9374FRival
Server / 32-core Genoa, higher clocks, 320 W TDP
- AMD EPYC 9354PRival
Server / 32-core Genoa, single-socket optimized variant
Higher core-count (64-core) Granite Rapids-SP SKU when more threads are needed and TDP budget allows.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Xeon 6748P
- AMD EPYC 9454Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9554Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9654Rival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6781PRival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6760PRival
Server
Same core count with higher cache and slightly lower TDP if you need more L3 per core.
Compare head-to-headLower core count and TDP for less demanding server workloads with similar platform features.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Xeon 6900P seriesAlt
Higher‑core‑count Granite Rapids‑AP platform for those needing 72–128 cores per socket.
Our Verdict on Each
A powerful 32-core Granite Rapids-SP CPU that excels in memory-bandwidth-sensitive and I/O-heavy server workloads, but its 300 W TDP and platform cost limit it to professional deployments where those features justify the investment.
Best for: Dual-socket servers or workstations running memory-intensive, I/O-heavy workloads such as large databases, virtualization, or AI inference where the 6745P’s cache and memory bandwidth justify the platform cost.
Read the full reviewA strong 48-core server CPU for multi-socket platforms that need high memory bandwidth and PCIe connectivity, but with a 300 W TDP and premium price that demand careful platform and cooling design.
Best for: Building or upgrading 2–8 socket servers for virtualization, databases, or HPC where high core count, memory bandwidth, and PCIe connectivity are critical and platform cost can be justified.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6745P or Intel Xeon 6748P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6748P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6745P or Intel Xeon 6748P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6748P leads with a gaming performance score of 40/100 among Intel Xeon 6745P and Intel Xeon 6748P.
Do Intel Xeon 6745P and Intel Xeon 6748P use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Xeon 6745P: FCLGA4710 (LGA4710), Intel Xeon 6748P: FCLGA4710), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6748P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6745P (32 cores), Intel Xeon 6748P (48 cores).