CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6740P vs Intel Xeon 6760P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6740P is a 48-core, 96-thread server processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP architecture, designed for dual-socket enterprise and cloud workloads requiring high core counts, large cache, and strong memory bandwidth.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Strong CPU-based inference for models that fit in cache and memory.
- No dedicated AI matrix units beyond AVX-512/AMX in this generation.
- Best suited as a host CPU for GPU-accelerated AI training or inference.
- Intel AMX accelerates matrix operations common in AI inference and training.
- On-die accelerators such as DSA, IAA, DLB, and QAT offload data movement and compression tasks.
- Large memory capacity and bandwidth support larger models and datasets.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Not designed or marketed for gaming.
- Lack of integrated graphics and optimized latency for client workloads.
- Better suited for server and enterprise use cases.
- Xeon 6760P is a server processor without integrated graphics.
- Gaming performance is not a target use case.
- Running games requires a discrete GPU and appropriate platform support.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 48 cores and 96 threads for high parallel throughput
- 288 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for large datasets
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 memory subsystem
- Up to 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes in 2P configs for GPU and NVMe expansion
- Strong platform features (CXL 2.0, Intel AMX, QAT, DSA) for server workloads
- Good performance-per-watt within its core-count and frequency band
Cons
- High 270 W TDP requires robust cooling and power delivery
- Locked multiplier with no overclocking headroom
- No integrated graphics; must be paired with a discreet GPU or BMC
- Platform and memory costs are significant compared to client CPUs
- Single-thread performance is lower than lower-core-count, higher-clocked SKUs
Pros
- 64 cores and 128 threads for high parallel throughput.
- 320 MB L3 cache reduces latency for memory-bound workloads.
- Eight DDR5 channels with support for 6400 MT/s.
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes enable extensive I/O configurations.
- Integrated accelerators (AMX, DSA, IAA, DLB, QAT) offload specialized tasks.
- Supports advanced security features such as Intel TDX and TME.
Cons
- 330 W TDP requires significant cooling and power delivery.
- No integrated graphics.
- Multiplier is locked, limiting enthusiast tuning.
- Requires enterprise-grade platforms and infrastructure.
- Two-socket scalability (2S) may not be necessary for all deployments.
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6740P
- AMD EPYC 9474FRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9654Rival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6760PRival
Server
- Intel Xeon 6730PRival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6781PRival
Server
- Intel Xeon 6500P SeriesAlt
Lower-core-count P-core SKUs (e.g., 6530P) with similar platform features but reduced TDP and cost.
Intel Xeon 6760P
- AMD EPYC 9755Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9754Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9684XRival
Server
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6980PRival
Server
- Intel Xeon 6700 seriesRival
Server
- Intel Xeon 6700P seriesAlt
Similar architecture with different core-count and TDP options to match workload needs.
- AMD EPYC 9004 seriesAlt
Alternative x86 server platforms with varied core counts and competitive performance-per-watt.
- AMD EPYC BergamoAlt
High core density for cloud-native workloads.
- Intel Xeon 5th Gen ScalableAlt
Existing platforms upgrading within the same ecosystem, albeit with older architecture.
Our Verdict on Each
A high-core-count Granite Rapids-SP Xeon optimized for 2P servers needing strong memory bandwidth and large cache, though power and platform cost are substantial.
Best for: Building or refreshing a dual-socket server for virtualization, databases, or general enterprise workloads where core density and memory bandwidth matter more than absolute single-thread performance.
Read the full reviewThe Xeon 6760P delivers very high core counts and wide I/O for demanding server workloads, but its 330 W power envelope requires robust platform design and careful thermal planning.
Best for: Data center deployments requiring high core density, wide I/O, and accelerators for AI and analytics.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6740P or Intel Xeon 6760P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6740P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Xeon 6740P or Intel Xeon 6760P?
For gaming, the Intel Xeon 6740P leads with a gaming performance score of 0/100 among Intel Xeon 6740P and Intel Xeon 6760P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6740P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6740P (270 W), Intel Xeon 6760P (330 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6740P and Intel Xeon 6760P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6760P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6740P (48 cores), Intel Xeon 6760P (64 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Xeon 6740P posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Xeon 6740P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.