CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6725P vs Intel Xeon 6737P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6725P is a 16-core, 32-thread server processor based on the Granite Rapids-SP (Redwood Cove P-core) architecture, built on Intel’s Intel 3 process and targeting high-frequency, memory-intensive workloads in virtualized, database, and AI inference environments.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- AMX instructions accelerate matrix workloads for inference
- Suited to CPU-based AI inferencing and data preprocessing
- Not a replacement for dedicated GPUs or accelerators for large models
- Intel AMX with BF16/INT8 support accelerates deep learning inference
- Two AVX-512 FMA units per core benefit vectorized AI and HPC kernels
- No dedicated AI accelerator; heavy AI training still better suited to GPUs
Content Creation
Gaming
- Server processor without integrated graphics
- Not validated or marketed for gaming
- Gaming benchmarks are not meaningful for this segment
- Server processor not targeted at gaming
- No integrated graphics
- No official gaming benchmarks
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 16 high-frequency P-cores with up to 4.8 GHz turbo
- 192 MB L3 cache and 8-channel DDR5-6400 for memory-intensive workloads
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for flexible I/O and accelerator configurations
- Intel 3 process and chiplet architecture for scalable performance
- Strong security and acceleration: AMX, QAT, DLB, SGX, TDX, MK-TME
Cons
- Higher TDP (235 W) than lower-core Granite Rapids-SP SKUs
- No integrated graphics (typical for server CPUs)
- Locked multiplier limits overclocking headroom
- Premium price segment typical of Xeon 6 performance-core parts
- Core count modest vs some competing EPYC 9005 SKUs at similar price
Pros
- 32 high-performance P-cores with 4 GHz max turbo
- Intel AMX and dual AVX-512 FMA units for AI and HPC
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes with CXL 2.0 platform support
- 8-channel DDR5-6400 up to 4 TB per socket
- Rich accelerator set (QAT, DLB, DSA, IAA) offloads crypto, analytics, and streaming
- Granite Rapids-SP platform with UPI 2.0 for coherent dual-socket designs
Cons
- High 270 W TDP requires robust cooling and power design
- Platform and CPU cost are significant compared to previous-gen Xeons
- Locked multiplier limits enthusiast-style overclocking
- No integrated graphics; not suitable for headless or lightweight client use
- Full performance potential depends on server firmware and OS support for Speed Select and accelerators
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6725P
- Compare head-to-headIntel Xeon 6724PRival
Server (16-core Granite Rapids-SP)
- Intel Xeon 6730PRival
Server (32-core Granite Rapids-SP)
- AMD EPYC 9175FRival
Server (16-core Zen 5, high boost)
- AMD EPYC 9115Rival
Server (16-core Zen 5, lower TDP)
- AMD EPYC 9125Rival
Server (16-core Zen 5, mid-range)
Intel Xeon 6737P
- AMD EPYC 7573XRival
Server (32-core, Milan-X)
- AMD EPYC 9384XRival
Server (Genoa-X, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon Gold 6448YRival
Server (4th Gen Xeon Scalable, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon Gold 6438MRival
Server (4th Gen Xeon Scalable, 32-core)
- Intel Xeon 6730PRival
Server (Xeon 6700P, 32-core, lower turbo)
Same 32-core Granite Rapids-SP family with higher 4.2 GHz turbo for slightly better per-thread performance.
Compare head-to-headLower 2.5 GHz base and 245 W TDP for slightly better power efficiency at reduced peak clocks.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A strong 16-core Xeon 6 SKU for customers who value high per-thread clocks, large DDR5 bandwidth, and extensive I/O over maximum core density, with excellent security and acceleration features for modern data centers.
Best for: Upgrading or building 1S/2S servers where you need strong per-thread performance, large DDR5 bandwidth, and 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes more than sheer core count.
Read the full reviewA strong Xeon 6 P-core SKU for two-socket servers that need high per-core performance, AMX acceleration, and plenty of PCIe 5.0 connectivity, though its 270 W TDP and platform cost demand careful power and cooling planning.
Best for: Dual-socket servers running virtualization, in-memory databases, or mixed AI/HPC workloads that can leverage AMX and high PCIe 5.0 lane counts.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6725P or Intel Xeon 6737P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6737P comes out ahead with a score of 8.7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6725P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6725P (235 W), Intel Xeon 6737P (270 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6725P and Intel Xeon 6737P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCLGA4710 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6737P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6725P (16 cores), Intel Xeon 6737P (32 cores).