CPU Comparison
Intel Xeon 6563P-B vs Intel Xeon 6724P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Xeon 6563P-B is a 38-core server SoC in the Xeon 6 family, offering four DDR5 memory channels, PCIe Gen 5 and Gen 4 I/O, and a 235 W TDP for entry-server and edge workloads.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Lacks dedicated NPUs; suitable for CPU-based inference only
- AI throughput depends heavily on software optimizations and attached accelerators
- AMX support improves matrix multiply throughput for AI inference on CPU.
- QAT and DSA can offload data movement and compression in AI pipelines.
- For heavy training, GPUs or dedicated accelerators are still preferred.
Content Creation
Gaming
- No integrated graphics
- Server-focused platform and cooling requirements
- Gaming-oriented CPUs provide far better price/performance
- Xeon 6724P is a server processor without integrated graphics and is not intended for gaming.
- Modern server platforms may lack BIOS features and driver optimizations used in desktop gaming.
- Performance would be limited by the server environment, cooling, and lack of GPU focus.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 38 performance cores with 76 threads
- DDR5-6400 support across four channels
- PCIe Gen 5 and Gen 4 lanes for flexible I/O
- ECC memory support for server reliability
- SoC integration suited for edge appliances
Cons
- No integrated graphics
- High 235 W TDP requires robust cooling
- BGA package is not socket-upgradable
- Multiplier locked, no enthusiast overclocking
- Market-focused; overkill and overpriced for typical desktop usage
Pros
- High clock speeds for a 16-core server CPU
- Eight DDR5-6400 memory channels with up to 4 TB capacity
- 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes for extensive IO and accelerators
- Intel 3 manufacturing for better efficiency over prior nodes
- On-die accelerators (QAT, DSA, DLB, IAA) reduce load on CPU cores
- AMX improves CPU-based AI inference performance
- Support for up to eight sockets (4S/8S scalability)
- Comprehensive security and RAS features (TDX, SGX, TME)
Cons
- No integrated graphics
- Multiplier locked; no overclocking support
- 16-core count is lower than many high-end server SKUs
- 210 W TDP at 16 cores raises power-per-core vs higher-core SKUs
- Availability may be limited to enterprise channels and OEMs
- Server platform may be overkill for workstation or consumer use cases
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Xeon 6563P-B
- AMD EPYC 8004 seriesRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9004 seriesRival
Server
Similar platform with lower core count and TDP for lighter workloads.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Xeon E-2400 seriesAlt
Prior-generation entry server parts with DDR4 and lower cost.
- AMD EPYC 8534PAlt
High core count with PCIe 5 and DDR5 in a socketed server platform.
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7000Alt
Workstation-class performance with more consumer-friendly platform features.
- Intel Xeon Gold 6538NAlt
Higher-end socketed Xeon with more memory channels for scale-out servers.
Intel Xeon 6724P
- AMD EPYC 9455Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9335Rival
Server
- AMD EPYC 8534PRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9354PRival
Server
- AMD EPYC 9254Rival
Server
- Intel Xeon 6720PAlt
Lower-cost 6700P-series option if 16 cores are sufficient and budget is a priority.
- Intel Xeon 6729PAlt
More cores within the same family for higher throughput in parallel workloads.
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960XAlt
For single-socket workstation builds requiring high PCIe and memory bandwidth but using a desktop/workstation platform.
Our Verdict on Each
A strong 38-core SoC with modern I/O and DDR5, ideal for dense edge and single-socket entry servers; not for gaming due to lack of integrated graphics and high TDP.
Best for: Edge server or entry-server appliance needing modern I/O and many cores in a compact single-socket design
Read the full reviewThe Xeon 6724P brings Granite Rapids fundamentals—Intel 3, DDR5-6400, PCIe 5.0, and AMX—into a 16-core package well-suited for per-core licensing, high-frequency workloads, and IO-heavy servers. At 210 W, it’s not the lowest-power option, but accelerators like QAT, DSA, DLB, and IAA broaden its appeal for data processing and AI.
Best for: Enterprise workloads that benefit from high per-core performance, DDR5 bandwidth, and on-die accelerators—especially databases, virtualization, and AI inference.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Xeon 6563P-B or Intel Xeon 6724P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Xeon 6724P comes out ahead with a score of 8.4/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Xeon 6724P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Xeon 6563P-B (235 W), Intel Xeon 6724P (210 W).
Do Intel Xeon 6563P-B and Intel Xeon 6724P use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Xeon 6563P-B: FCBGA4368, Intel Xeon 6724P: FCLGA4710), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Xeon 6563P-B has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Xeon 6563P-B (38 cores), Intel Xeon 6724P (16 cores).