CPU Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a versatile mobile processor launched in January 2025, based on the Arrow Lake-H architecture. It is tailored for premium thin-and-light laptops and portable creators, featuring a 16-core, 16-thread hybrid design. The configuration includes 6 'Lion Cove' P-Cores, 10 'Skymont' E-Cores, and 2 Low-Power E-Cores (LP E-Cores) for maximum efficiency. Built on TSMC's 3nm process, with specific tiles utilizing N6 and N5 nodes, it achieves an excellent balance of performance and power efficiency. The processor operates at a 2.0 GHz base frequency and boosts up to 5.1 GHz. With a default TDP of 28W and a configurable turbo power up to 115W, it adapts dynamically to thermal constraints. It also features Arc Graphics 140T and a 13 TOPS NPU, delivering a combined 96 TOPS of AI performance, making it a highly capable chip for modern AI-accelerated workflows.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Snappy application performance and strong multi-core scaling for a 28W chip.
Highly responsive in multi-threaded apps, though limited by 45W thermal envelope.
Gaming
Arc 140T graphics allow for respectable 1080p gaming at medium settings without a discrete GPU.
The Arc 140T iGPU delivers surprisingly good 1080p gaming performance for an integrated solution.
Virtualization
Capable of running light VMs, though limited by 16 threads.
Good for local VMs, though memory capacity is limited by mobile LPDDR5 implementations.
Efficiency
Excellent efficiency thanks to LP E-Cores and mixed TSMC nodes.
Excellent performance-per-watt, ensuring long battery life for light tasks.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- NPU provides 13 TOPS
- Arc GPU provides 74 TOPS
- Total platform AI reaches 96 TOPS
- 13 TOPS NPU
- Combined platform TOPS up to 99
- Arc 140T GPU contributes heavily to AI workloads
Content Creation
Gaming
- Arc 140T is a massive leap over previous iGPUs
- Can handle esports titles at high framerates
- Supports XeSS upscaling for better performance
- Arc 140T is a major step up over previous iGPUs
- Capable of medium-settings 1080p gaming
- Can be paired with low-end dGPUs for better performance
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Massive 96 TOPS AI performance
- Powerful Arc 140T integrated graphics
- Excellent 28W power efficiency
- Includes LP E-Cores for battery life
- 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes
Cons
- Locked multiplier
- L3 cache reduced to 24 MB compared to HX
- Max memory limited to 64 GB
- Cannot match discrete GPU performance
Pros
- Excellent performance-per-watt
- Strong integrated Arc 140T graphics
- Supports ultra-fast LPDDR5X-8400 memory
- Includes low-power E-cores for battery efficiency
- Good single-threaded performance at 5.4 GHz
Cons
- Locked multiplier
- Only 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU
- Lower core count than HX series
- Soldered to the motherboard (BGA)
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M4Rival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258VRival
Mobile
Next generation with better AI performance and graphics.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Excellent alternative for macOS users seeking efficiency.
Compare head-to-head Budget-friendly alternative with similar architecture.
Compare head-to-head- Qualcomm Snapdragon X PlusAlt
Alternative for ARM-based efficiency and battery life.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M4 ProRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 9 185HRival
Mobile
- Snapdragon X EliteRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 365Alt
A strong mid-range alternative with excellent battery life.
- Alt
Great alternative for users within the Apple ecosystem.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core Ultra 7 155HAlt
Previous generation alternative for cost savings.
- AMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAlt
Budget-friendly mobile option with good performance.
If you need more raw power and can sacrifice portability.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
An exceptionally well-rounded mobile CPU that perfectly balances power, efficiency, and integrated graphics capabilities for premium laptops.
Best for: Premium ultrabook or thin-and-light creator laptop
Read the full reviewA perfectly balanced 45W processor that delivers desktop-like responsiveness in portable form factors, bolstered by strong iGPU and AI capabilities.
Best for: The Core Ultra 9 285H is highly recommended for users seeking a premium, thin-and-light laptop capable of handling heavy workloads without sacrificing portability. If you are a content creator, software developer, or gamer who values battery life and a lightweight chassis, this processor strikes the perfect balance. Its 45W base power ensures it runs cooler than the HX series, making it ideal for laptops under 5 pounds. The inclusion of Arc 140T graphics means you can even do light gaming or video editing without a discrete GPU. However, if your primary use case is rendering complex 3D scenes or running sustained compiles for hours, you might be better served by a thicker HX-class laptop. Ensure the laptop utilizes LPDDR5X to maximize battery life, and consider pairing it with a mid-range discrete GPU if you plan on serious gaming. It is the ultimate choice for a do-it-all premium ultrabook.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 7 255H or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H comes out ahead with a score of 8.9/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 7 255H or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H leads with a gaming performance score of 85/100 among Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (28 W), Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (45 W).
Do Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 2049 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.