CPU Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 5 335 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core Ultra 5 335 is an 8-core, 8-thread mobile SoC from Intel’s Panther Lake family, built on the Intel 18A process for thin-and-light and mainstream business laptops with strong AI acceleration and integrated Xe3 graphics.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Responsive office work, multi‑tab browsing, and light content creation; multi‑threaded workloads benefit from the 8 cores but are limited by 8 threads and no SMT.
Excellent single-core performance for office tasks and web apps.
Gaming
Smooth for esports and older titles at 1080p with reduced settings; modern AAA games will often need a discrete GPU for high settings.
Arc 140V is a massive leap, allowing 1080p gaming in thin-and-lights.
Virtualization
Can handle light VM workloads, but memory and core counts are more constrained than on H‑series or desktop chips.
Limited by 8 threads and 32GB max memory, but capable of light VMs.
Efficiency
Intel 18A and the 25–55 W power envelope enable strong efficiency for thin laptops, with real‑world battery life often matching comparable Snapdragon X Elite systems in early tests.
Industry-leading performance-per-watt for x86 laptops.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- NPU 5 with up to 50 TOPS INT8 is tailored for on‑device AI features like Windows Studio Effects and local LLM assistants.
- CPU + GPU + NPU together enable modest AI workloads, but not a replacement for high‑end discrete AI accelerators.
- 48 TOPS NPU enables Copilot+ PC features like Recall
- Can run small LLMs locally
- NPU offloads CPU/GPU for better battery during AI tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- Xe3 iGPU significantly better than older UHD Graphics but not intended for serious gaming.
- Esports titles (Valorant, CS2, LoL) generally playable at 1080p medium/high.
- AAA titles typically require low settings and often upscaling for playable frame rates.
- Arc 140V iGPU can play modern titles at 1080p Low/Medium
- Massive improvement over previous Intel iGPUs
- Not a replacement for discrete laptop GPUs
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Intel 18A brings improved performance per watt for mobile designs.
- 8 cores (4P + 4LP) handle everyday multitasking and light parallel workloads well.
- NPU 5 enables modern on‑device AI features without heavily loading CPU or GPU.
- Xe3 iGPU with ray tracing and modern media engines is a big step over older UHD Graphics.
- 25–55 W configurable TDP fits a wide range of laptop form factors.
Cons
- Only 8 threads; no SMT limits heavy multi‑threaded throughput versus 12–16 thread rivals.
- Gaming capability is still modest; not a replacement for a discrete GPU.
- Soldered BGA package means no CPU upgrades; you’re stuck with what the laptop ships with.
- Maximum 128 GB memory and 12 PCIe lanes may feel restrictive for high‑end workloads.
- New platform; early firmware and driver quirks are possible in first‑generation designs.
Pros
- Exceptional power efficiency
- 32GB RAM integrated on package
- 48 TOPS NPU for Copilot+ AI
- Powerful Arc 140V integrated graphics
- Silent operation in slim chassis
Cons
- Memory is non-upgradable (soldered to CPU)
- Only 8 threads limits heavy multi-threading
- Expensive, only found in premium laptops
- Low PCIe lane count for expansion
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core Ultra 5 335
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 345Rival
Mobile AI/Performance
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840URival
Thin-and-Light
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258VRival
Premium Thin-and-Light (Lunar Lake)
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235URival
Mainstream Mobile (Arrow Lake U)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
ARM-based AI PC
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Rival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M3Rival
Mobile
- Alt
Best alternative if you are open to macOS for premium ultrabooks.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core Ultra 7 258VAlt
Slightly lower clocked Lunar Lake chip for a better price.
Meteor Lake alternative if you need more cores and discrete GPU.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A capable mid-range mobile SoC that balances performance, power, and AI features for mainstream laptops, though gamers and heavy creators will still want a dGPU.
Best for: Business and productivity‑focused thin‑and‑light laptops where AI features, modern connectivity, and integrated graphics matter more than heavy gaming or multi‑GPU workloads.
Read the full reviewAn engineering marvel that combines memory, CPU, GPU, and NPU into a highly efficient package, redefining laptop battery life and AI capabilities.
Best for: Buying a premium ultrabook for all-day battery life and AI features.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 5 335 or Intel Core Ultra 9 288V?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V comes out ahead with a score of 9.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 5 335 or Intel Core Ultra 9 288V?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V leads with a gaming performance score of 85/100 among Intel Core Ultra 5 335 and Intel Core Ultra 9 288V.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 335 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core Ultra 5 335 (25 W), Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (30 W).
Do Intel Core Ultra 5 335 and Intel Core Ultra 9 288V use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core Ultra 5 335: FCBGA2540, Intel Core Ultra 9 288V: BGA 2833), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (15,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.