CPU Comparison
Intel Core Ultra 5 325 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core Ultra 5 325 is an 8-core, 8-thread mainstream mobile SoC from Intel’s Panther Lake (Core Ultra Series 3) family, built on the Intel 18A process. It combines four Cougar Cove performance cores with four Darkmont low‑power efficient cores, 12 MB of shared Smart Cache, and an integrated 4‑core Xe3‑class GPU with 40 GPU TOPS and a 47 TOPS NPU, targeting thin‑and‑light AI PCs with a 25–55 W configurable TDP.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 47 TOPS NPU supports Windows Studio Effects and on‑device inference
- 40 TOPS GPU AI compute complements NPU for hybrid workloads
- Total CPU+GPU+NPU TOPS competitive for mainstream thin‑and‑light AI PCs
- NPU 5 provides 47 INT8 TOPS for sustained AI inference.
- Well‑suited for Windows Studio Effects, local AI assistants, and small LLMs.
- OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, and ONNX RT are supported for easy software integration.
Content Creation
Gaming
- 4‑core Xe3 iGPU suitable for 1080p low/medium in many titles
- Much faster than older 11th‑gen Xe but slower than 8‑core Xe or Arc B‑series iGPUs
- Best for light and casual gaming rather than high‑refresh or high‑detail AAA
- 4 Xe3 cores deliver a big step up over older Intel UHD/iGPUs but are still behind the 12 Xe3 Arc iGPUs on X‑series SKUs.
- Older or esports titles (CS2, Valorant, LoL) are very playable at 1080p medium/high.
- Demanding AAA games at 1080p high often require lower settings or upscaling (XeSS).
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Strong single‑thread and responsiveness for everyday tasks
- Meaningful AI compute with 47 TOPS NPU and 40 TOPS GPU
- Good efficiency on Intel 18A at 25 W base power
- Capable 4‑core Xe3 iGPU with AV1 and modern display outputs
- 12 MB Smart Cache improves gaming and threaded workloads
- Supports DDR5‑6400 and LPDDR5X‑7467 with up to 128 GB RAM
Cons
- Only 8 threads with no SMT; weaker in heavily threaded workloads than higher‑core SKUs
- Locked multiplier limits overclocking headroom
- 12 PCIe lanes may constrain expansion in some designs
- Only four P‑cores; not ideal for sustained all‑core workloads compared to 6+ core rivals
- OEM‑dependent GPU branding (Intel Graphics vs Arc) can be confusing
Pros
- Modern Intel 18A process on the CPU tile for better efficiency.
- 12 CPU cores (4P + 4E + 4LP‑E) provide strong mainstream multi‑threaded performance.
- Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 iGPU with ray tracing and AV1 encode is a big upgrade over older UHD/iGPUs.
- Dedicated NPU 5 (47 TOPS) for AI workloads and Windows Studio Effects.
- Supports DDR5‑7200 and LPDDR5X‑8533 with up to 128 GB RAM.
- vPro and embedded options suit business and edge devices.
Cons
- No Hyper‑Threading; only 12 threads vs 12 cores.
- 4 Xe3 iGPU cores are slower than 12 Xe3 Arc iGPUs on X‑series Panther Lake parts.
- Not intended for heavy AAA gaming or high‑end content creation without a discrete GPU.
- Maximum turbo power (65 W) may be high for very thin fanless designs under sustained load.
- Limited overclocking due to locked multiplier.
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core Ultra 5 325
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Rival
Mainstream Mobile AI APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 332Rival
Mainstream Mobile / Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 7 355Rival
Mainstream Mobile / Premium Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 322Rival
Entry-Level Mobile / Value
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840URival
Thin-and-Light Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 5 125HAlt
Older Meteor Lake part with 14 cores/18 threads; more threaded performance but lower efficiency and weaker NPU/GPU AI features.
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
- Compare head-to-headAMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440Rival
Mainstream Mobile AI PC
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840HSRival
Performance Thin-and-Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 7 355Rival
Higher-End Mainstream Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 338HRival
Same Platform, Slightly Faster SKU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 7 365Rival
Higher-End Panther Lake-H
Our Verdict on Each
A solid mainstream mobile SoC that delivers meaningful CPU and NPU upgrades over prior Ultra 5 generations, with good efficiency and capable integrated graphics—best for users who want AI features and balanced performance in a thin laptop rather than outright compute headroom.
Best for: Thin‑and‑light AI PC where you want strong efficiency, modern AI features, and better integrated graphics than older Ultra 5 chips, but don’t need the extra cores or GPU power of Core Ultra 7 or X7 SKUs.
Read the full reviewA well-balanced mainstream mobile SoC that finally brings Intel’s 18A process, Xe3 graphics, and serious NPU AI acceleration to the volume laptop segment, though gaming and heavy creator workloads still lean more toward higher-SKU or discrete-GPU designs.
Best for: Mainstream laptops where you want modern CPU features, good efficiency, and AI capabilities without paying for a high‑end gaming or creator SKU.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Do Intel Core Ultra 5 325 and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the FCBGA2540 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core Ultra 5 325 (8 cores), Intel Core Ultra 5 336H (12 cores).