CPU Comparison
Intel Core i9-10980XE vs Intel Core i9-7980XE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i9-10980XE is an 18-core, 36-thread high-end desktop processor built on the Cascade Lake-X architecture for enthusiasts and creators who need lots of PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory bandwidth on the LGA2066 platform.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- AVX-512 and DL Boost help with CPU-based inference and some AI workloads
- No dedicated AI accelerator; far slower than modern NPUs or GPUs for large models
- No dedicated NPUs; relies on AVX-512 for vectorized inference
- Suitable for small-scale experimentation and older models on CPU
Content Creation
Gaming
- High single-core boost up to 4.8 GHz helps in CPU-heavy titles
- PCIe 3.0 x16 is sufficient for current GPUs, but lacks PCIe 4.0/5.0 benefits
- Modern gaming CPUs often outperform it in latency-sensitive titles and 1% lows
- Capable of high-refresh gaming when paired with strong GPUs
- Single-core performance is lower than contemporary gaming-focused CPUs
- Platform lacks upgrade path to newer CPUs
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 18 cores and 36 threads for heavily threaded workloads
- 48 PCIe 3.0 lanes for multi-GPU and NVMe configurations
- Quad-channel DDR4-2933 memory with up to 256 GB support
- Strong multi-threaded creator and workstation performance
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
- AVX-512 and DL Boost support for certain compute and AI workloads
Cons
- High power consumption and heat output for the performance level
- 14nm process is far behind modern nodes in efficiency and density
- No integrated graphics; requires discrete GPU
- Discontinued platform with no upgrade path beyond Cascade Lake-X
- PCIe 3.0 only, lacking PCIe 4.0/5.0 benefits of newer platforms
Pros
- 18 cores and 36 threads for heavy parallel workloads
- 44 PCIe 3.0 lanes enable multiple GPUs and NVMe drives
- Quad-channel DDR4-2666 memory
- AVX-512 support for specialized workloads
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
- Strong multi-threaded performance in its era
Cons
- High power draw and thermal density
- No integrated graphics
- LGA2066/X299 platform effectively discontinued
- Lower per-core performance than newer generations
- DDR4-only memory support
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i9-10980XE
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950XRival
High-End Desktop / Creator
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960XRival
Workstation / HEDT
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970XRival
Workstation / HEDT
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-9980XERival
HEDT / Workstation
- Intel Xeon W-2295Rival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900Alt
More modern and efficient platform with DDR5 and PCIe 4.0, better for mixed gaming and creator workloads.
Much higher single-thread and gaming performance, plus modern platform features, though fewer PCIe lanes.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 9 7950XAlt
Higher multi-threaded performance, better efficiency, and newer platform if you don’t need 48 PCIe lanes.
- Intel Xeon W-2400 seriesAlt
Modern workstation platform with DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 if you need many lanes and workstation reliability.
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7000 seriesAlt
True HEDT successor with more cores, PCIe 5.0, and quad-channel DDR5 for heavy workstation use.
Intel Core i9-7980XE
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950XRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920XRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950XRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950XRival
Creator
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-9980XERival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WXAlt
Higher core counts for workstation workloads.
- AMD Ryzen 9 5950XAlt
Much higher efficiency and strong multi-core performance.
Newer X-series HEDT with refinements and more PCIe lanes.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3955WXAlt
Pro-grade platform with more memory channels and I/O.
Strong single- and multi-core performance on a current mainstream platform.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
Still a potent workstation and creator CPU thanks to its core count and expansion, but its 14nm process and high power draw make it hard to recommend over modern mainstream or HEDT alternatives unless bought cheap on the used market.
Best for: Used or heavily discounted workstation/creator build where you need many PCIe lanes and cores and already have an X299 motherboard.
Read the full reviewA flagship HEDT chip with massive multi-threaded throughput and abundant I/O, but high power draw and aging platform make it a specialist choice today.
Best for: Secondary workstation or used-market build needing lots of PCIe lanes and cores on a budget
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i9-10980XE or Intel Core i9-7980XE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i9-10980XE comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i9-10980XE or Intel Core i9-7980XE?
For gaming, the Intel Core i9-10980XE leads with a gaming performance score of 80/100 among Intel Core i9-10980XE and Intel Core i9-7980XE.
Do Intel Core i9-10980XE and Intel Core i9-7980XE use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i9-10980XE: FCLGA2066, Intel Core i9-7980XE: LGA2066), so each needs a compatible motherboard.