CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-7820X vs Intel Core i7-9800X
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-7820X is an 8-core, 16-thread high-end desktop processor on the X299 platform, offering quad-channel DDR4-2666, 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes, and AVX-512 support for workstation and creator workloads.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Strong multi-threaded throughput in CINEBENCH, HandBrake, and similar workloads at launch; still competent for many content creation tasks compared to modern mainstream parts.
Strong multi-threaded performance for rendering, encoding, and other creator workloads, especially when lots of I/O is involved.
Gaming
Delivers high frame rates in 2017-era titles and remains adequate for modern gaming, but newer gaming-focused CPUs with higher clocks and improved IPC pull ahead.
Capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p with a modern GPU, but newer mainstream CPUs often deliver better minimums and efficiency.
Virtualization
PCIe and memory bandwidth are helpful for multiple VMs, but core count is moderate for modern heavy virtualization needs.
Good for running several VMs thanks to 8 cores, 16 threads and quad-channel memory, though platform is now aging.
Efficiency
High 140 W TDP and 14 nm process lead to greater power consumption versus newer 7 nm and smaller nodes.
High 165 W TDP and 14 nm process result in notably higher power draw than modern 8-core alternatives for similar or better performance.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI acceleration hardware
- AVX-512 can help certain CPU-bound inference tasks
- Most modern AI workloads are better served by GPUs
- No dedicated AI or deep learning acceleration hardware.
- Suitable for CPU-based inference and light experimentation only.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Capable of high-refresh gaming with a strong GPU
- Single-core boost reaches up to 4.5 GHz on favored cores
- Modern CPUs offer better gaming efficiency and higher IPC
- Strong single-core clocks up to 4.5 GHz help gaming performance.
- Quad-channel memory can benefit some CPU-limited titles.
- Modern gaming-optimized CPUs often surpass it in 1% low fps and efficiency.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 8 cores and 16 threads for multi-threaded workloads
- Quad-channel DDR4 memory increases bandwidth
- 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes plus chipset lanes for expansion
- Turbo Boost Max 3.0 for higher single-core boosts
- AVX-512 support for optimized workloads
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
Cons
- High 140 W TDP and power consumption
- No integrated graphics
- Only 28 CPU PCIe lanes, limiting multi-GPU configurations
- Discontinued platform with limited future upgrades
- Older 14 nm process versus modern smaller nodes
Pros
- 8 cores and 16 threads handle multi-threaded workloads well
- 44 PCIe 3.0 lanes for multi-GPU and NVMe setups
- Quad-channel DDR4-2666 with 128 GB capacity
- Unlocked multiplier for flexible overclocking
- Solder TIM for improved thermals under load
- AVX-512 support for floating-point-intensive tasks
Cons
- High 165 W TDP and relatively low efficiency vs newer CPUs
- Older 14 nm process with no DDR5 or PCIe 4.0+
- No integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU
- Discontinued platform with limited long-term upgrade options
- Newer mainstream 8-core CPUs often match or beat it in gaming and efficiency
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-7820X
- AMD Ryzen 7 1800XRival
Creator/Gaming
- AMD Ryzen 7 1700XRival
Creator/Gaming
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920XRival
Workstation
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950XRival
Workstation
- RivalCompare head-to-head
More cores, higher efficiency, and DDR5 on a modern mainstream platform.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 9 7900Alt
Strong multi-threaded performance with excellent efficiency.
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900XAlt
12-core AM4 option with strong gaming and creator performance.
High-performance mainstream platform with good upgrade path.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (used)Alt
Higher core and lane count for workstation-class workloads.
Intel Core i7-9800X
- AMD Ryzen 7 2700XRival
Mainstream 8-core
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920XRival
HEDT 12-core
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-9900KRival
Mainstream 8-core Gaming
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-7820XRival
Previous-gen HEDT 8-core
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900XRival
High-Performance 12-core
Same platform with two more cores and slightly better performance if you stay on X299.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 9 7900Alt
Much more efficient modern platform with DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 if you are building new.
Far better gaming and efficiency on a mainstream platform with some creator workload capability.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 9 5900XAlt
Strong multi-threaded performance with better efficiency and a more modern platform.
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950XAlt
Much higher core count for heavily multi-threaded workstation workloads, though power is higher.
Our Verdict on Each
A competent eight-core HEDT chip with strong multi-threaded performance and platform expansion, though high power draw and limited PCIe lanes compared to higher-tier X299 CPUs make it a niche choice today.
Best for: Used-market upgrade for an existing X299 build with quad-channel DDR4 and a need for more cores than mainstream.
Read the full reviewA solid HEDT processor for users who need quad-channel memory and 44 PCIe lanes, but outclassed in efficiency and single-thread performance by newer mainstream and HEDT parts.
Best for: Used or discounted X299 workstation build where quad-channel memory and 44 PCIe lanes are critical and platform cost is low.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-7820X or Intel Core i7-9800X?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-9800X comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-7820X has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-7820X (140 W), Intel Core i7-9800X (165 W).
Do Intel Core i7-7820X and Intel Core i7-9800X use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-7820X: LGA2066, Intel Core i7-9800X: FCLGA2066), so each needs a compatible motherboard.