CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Core i7-1370P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-13705H is a premium 14-core mobile processor often found in high-end thin-and-light laptops and premium creator devices.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
14 cores handle heavy multitasking and rendering smoothly.
Strong application launch and compilation speeds.
Gaming
Performs admirably when paired with mid-range mobile GPUs.
Capable of 60fps in esports titles via integrated graphics.
Virtualization
Good for running enterprise VMs on the go.
Good for light VM usage on the go.
Efficiency
Highly efficient at low loads, scaling power dynamically.
Excellent performance-per-watt for ultrabook use.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Iris Xe includes AI acceleration matrices.
- Strong CPU inference with AVX2.
- Good for local AI inference
- GNA 3.0 for background noise cancellation
- DLBoost for image upscaling
Content Creation
Gaming
- Pairs well with RTX 4050/4060.
- Iris Xe can handle older or lighter games natively.
- Iris Xe 96EU handles older games well
- Requires a dGPU for modern AAA gaming
- Fast single-core speeds benefit CPU-bound games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Excellent performance-per-watt
- 14 cores provide strong multi-threading
- Iris Xe 96EU is a capable iGPU
- Supports PCIe 5.0 and LPDDR5
Cons
- Cannot be purchased standalone
- Performance heavily depends on OEM thermal tuning
- Soldered to motherboard
Pros
- Excellent balance of performance and power (28W)
- Iris Xe 96EU graphics are highly capable for an iGPU
- Supports fast LPDDR5-6400 memory
- High 5.2 GHz single-core boost
- Ideal for thin-and-light chassis
Cons
- Not unlocked for overclocking
- Limited to PCIe 4.0 (no Gen 5 support)
- Can throttle under sustained multi-threaded load without good cooling
- More expensive than U-series alternatives
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-13705H
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-13700HRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M2 ProRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M2Rival
Mobile
A slightly lower power alternative for ultra-thins.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HSAlt
A cost-effective alternative with good battery life.
Intel Core i7-1370P
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HSRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-1360PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M2 ProRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640HSRival
Mobile
- Alt
Unmatched battery life if you are in the Apple ecosystem.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core i5-1340PAlt
Better value for users who don't need maximum P-cores.
More power (45W) if your chassis can handle the heat.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A highly capable and efficient mobile CPU that strikes a perfect balance between multi-threaded power and portability for premium laptops.
Best for: Purchasing a premium thin-and-light laptop.
Read the full reviewAn excellent processor for ultrabooks and 14-inch laptops, offering strong burst performance and capable integrated graphics for on-the-go creators.
Best for: Premium 14-inch ultrabooks and thin-and-light creator laptops
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-13705H or Intel Core i7-1370P?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-13705H leads with a gaming performance score of 84/100 among Intel Core i7-13705H and Intel Core i7-1370P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-1370P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-13705H (45 W), Intel Core i7-1370P (28 W).
Do Intel Core i7-13705H and Intel Core i7-1370P use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1744 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-13705H posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-13705H (32,500), Intel Core i7-1370P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.