CPU Comparison
Apple M2 vs Intel Core i7-1370P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Apple M2 is a second‑generation 5 nm ARM‑based system‑on‑chip for Macs, with an 8‑core CPU, up to a 10‑core GPU, 16‑core Neural Engine, and 100 GB/s unified memory bandwidth, designed for thin‑and‑light laptops and compact desktops.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Very strong single‑thread and good multi‑thread performance for everyday apps and light creator workloads.
Strong application launch and compilation speeds.
Gaming
Solid for 1080p and many 1440p titles at medium–high settings; not intended for high‑refresh 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing.
Capable of 60fps in esports titles via integrated graphics.
Virtualization
Capable of light VM/container use, but limited to 8 threads and not aimed at heavy server workloads.
Good for light VM usage on the go.
Efficiency
Outstanding performance per watt; typically around 20 W CPU package power under multi‑threaded load, far below comparable x86 ultrabook chips.
Excellent performance-per-watt for ultrabook use.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16‑core Neural Engine at 15.8 TOPS
- Good for on‑device inference and Core ML workloads
- No large‑scale training focus; more for consumer features than datacenter AI
- Good for local AI inference
- GNA 3.0 for background noise cancellation
- DLBoost for image upscaling
Content Creation
Gaming
- Integrated 8–10 core GPU with up to 3.6 TFLOPS FP32
- Good for 1080p and some 1440p gaming at medium–high settings
- Limited by unified memory bandwidth and 8 CPU threads for CPU‑heavy titles
- Best experienced in macOS; Windows via virtualization or translation has overhead
- Iris Xe 96EU handles older games well
- Requires a dGPU for modern AAA gaming
- Fast single-core speeds benefit CPU-bound games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Very strong single‑core performance for an ultrabook‑class chip
- Integrated 8–10 core GPU with up to 3.6 TFLOPS and hardware ProRes acceleration
- Unified memory architecture with 100 GB/s bandwidth simplifies development and avoids CPU–GPU copies
- 16‑core Neural Engine accelerates on‑device ML workloads
- Fanless designs in MacBook Air and very quiet operation under typical loads
Cons
- Not sold as a standalone CPU; only available inside Macs
- No user‑upgradable RAM or PCIe slots; I/O limited to what Apple provides
- Only 8 CPU threads; heavy multi‑threaded workloads are limited compared to higher‑core M2 Pro/Max or x86 chips
- CPU efficiency is slightly worse than M1 at maximum performance due to higher clocks and power
- Gaming performance is constrained by 8 threads and integrated GPU; not a gaming‑focused SoC
Pros
- Excellent balance of performance and power (28W)
- Iris Xe 96EU graphics are highly capable for an iGPU
- Supports fast LPDDR5-6400 memory
- High 5.2 GHz single-core boost
- Ideal for thin-and-light chassis
Cons
- Not unlocked for overclocking
- Limited to PCIe 4.0 (no Gen 5 support)
- Can throttle under sustained multi-threaded load without good cooling
- More expensive than U-series alternatives
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M2
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800URival
Ultrabook
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7‑1260PRival
Ultrabook
- Intel Core i7‑1355URival
Ultrabook
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730URival
Ultrabook
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Ultrabook
- Alt
More CPU/GPU cores and higher memory bandwidth for heavier creator workloads.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 7 7840UAlt
Stronger multi‑threaded performance and better x86 Windows compatibility in ultrabook form factors.
- Intel Core Ultra 7 155HAlt
Good balance of CPU and integrated GPU performance for Windows ultrabooks with NPU‑accelerated AI features.
- Alt
Newer architecture with higher performance and better efficiency if you are buying a new Mac in 2024+.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i7-1370P
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HSRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-1360PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M2 ProRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640HSRival
Mobile
- Alt
Unmatched battery life if you are in the Apple ecosystem.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core i5-1340PAlt
Better value for users who don't need maximum P-cores.
More power (45W) if your chassis can handle the heat.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A very efficient, well‑balanced SoC that makes more sense inside a Mac than as a standalone chip; strong single‑core performance, capable integrated graphics, and excellent efficiency, but not a workstation‑class part.
Best for: You are buying a new or refurbished Mac laptop or desktop and want a significant step up from Intel‑based Macs or older M1 models, especially for single‑threaded tasks and GPU‑accelerated apps.
Read the full reviewAn excellent processor for ultrabooks and 14-inch laptops, offering strong burst performance and capable integrated graphics for on-the-go creators.
Best for: Premium 14-inch ultrabooks and thin-and-light creator laptops
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M2 or Intel Core i7-1370P?
For gaming, the Apple M2 leads with a gaming performance score of 78/100 among Apple M2 and Intel Core i7-1370P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-1370P has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-1370P (28 W).
Do Apple M2 and Intel Core i7-1370P use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Apple M2: On‑Package (BGA), Intel Core i7-1370P: Intel BGA 1744), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i7-1370P has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M2 (8 cores), Intel Core i7-1370P (14 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Apple M2 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M2 (9,800), Intel Core i7-1370P (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.