CPU Comparison
Core i7-1195G7 vs Intel Core i9-11900H
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-1195G7 is a Tiger Lake-U refresh released in mid-2021, offering a slight bump in frequencies over the original i7-1185G7. Built on the 10nm SuperFin process, it features 4 cores and 8 threads, but pushes the turbo frequency to an impressive 5.0 GHz. This makes it one of the fastest single-threaded mobile processors of its era. The base clock is set at 2.9 GHz, with a configurable TDP ranging from 12W to 28W. Unlike the 1185G7, the 1195G7 upgrades the PCIe support to 16 lanes of Gen 4, enabling full bandwidth for high-end discrete GPUs in larger laptop chassis. It retains the excellent Iris Xe-LP Graphics with 96 EUs. Targeted at premium ultrabooks and thin-and-light gaming laptops, this processor aimed to hold off AMD's Ryzen 5000 mobile series by maximizing burst performance and platform connectivity.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
The 5.0 GHz boost provides unmatched snappiness for daily tasks.
Capable in content creation and professional apps, with competitive single-core and solid multi-thread performance for an 8-core mobile CPU in 2021, but newer designs pull ahead in sustained workloads.
Gaming
Excellent when paired with a discrete GPU due to 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes.
Strong for 1080p gaming at high refresh rates when paired with a midrange or better discrete GPU. Modern 12th/13th-gen Intel and Ryzen 6000/7000 mobile CPUs tend to edge it out in CPU-heavy titles and efficiency.
Virtualization
Good for light VMs, but 4 cores limit heavy virtualization.
Good for running several VMs or containers on a laptop, but limited by 8 cores and typical laptop power limits compared to modern HX-series parts.
Efficiency
Pushing 5.0 GHz on 10nm can generate significant heat in thin chassis.
Performance-per-watt is decent but not class-leading; AMD’s Ryzen 5000/6000 and Intel’s Alder Lake/Raptor Lake are notably more efficient under many workloads.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- DLBoost present
- No dedicated NPU
- Fast single-core speeds help CPU AI tasks
- No dedicated NPU; relies on CPU AVX-512 and GNA 2.0 for AI workloads
- Suitable for light local inference and on-device ML, not serious training or large models
- Intel Deep Learning Boost (AVX-512 VNNI) helps some quantized inference tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- 16 PCIe lanes prevent dGPU bottlenecks
- Iris Xe is excellent for casual gaming
- CPU bottleneck possible in multi-threaded games
- High single-core turbo (up to 4.9 GHz) benefits CPU-bound games
- Performance highly dependent on laptop cooling and power limits
- Competitive with Ryzen 7 5800H in many games at similar power
- Newer Intel/AMD mobile CPUs often deliver higher FPS at lower power
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 5.0 GHz single-core turbo
- 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes
- Excellent Iris Xe graphics
- Strong single-thread performance
Cons
- Only 4 cores
- End-of-life platform
- Can run hot at 5.0 GHz
- Expensive at launch
Pros
- 8 high-performance Willow Cove cores with strong single-thread speed
- 20 PCIe 4.0 CPU lanes for GPU and NVMe
- DDR4-3200 dual-channel with good bandwidth
- Configurable 35–45 W TDP fits both thin and thick designs
- Integrated UHD Graphics with Quick Sync for video encode/decode
- AVX-512 and DL Boost for specialized workloads
Cons
- Older 10 nm SuperFin process is less efficient than Intel 7 and TSMC 7 nm/6 nm
- No DDR5 or PCIe 5.0 support; platform feels dated in 2026
- Locked multiplier limits overclocking headroom
- Power-hungry under sustained multi-thread vs modern competitors
- Now discontinued; no long-term platform upgrade path
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i7-1195G7
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-11900HRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1185G7Alt
Cheaper and nearly identical for non-gaming use.
Newer 12th Gen with more cores.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Superior efficiency and multi-core.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 5 5600HAlt
Better budget gaming performance.
Intel Core i9-11900H
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800HRival
High-End Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-11800HRival
High-End Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HXRival
Enthusiast Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i9-10885HRival
High-End Mobile (Previous Gen)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-12700HRival
High-End Mobile (Next Gen)
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HSAlt
More efficient Zen 3+ with RDNA 2 iGPU and better battery life in many designs.
- Intel Core i9-12900HAlt
14-core Alder Lake-H with higher single- and multi-thread performance and DDR5 support on newer platforms.
If you don’t need 8 cores, a newer 12th-gen i5 can be faster and more efficient while costing less.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A potent refresh of Tiger Lake, offering exceptional single-core speeds and improved PCIe expansion for high-end mobile devices.
Best for: Buying a used premium ultrabook or thin-and-light laptop.
Read the full reviewA fast 8-core mobile CPU in its day, with strong single-thread performance and PCIe 4.0, but now outclassed by 12th/13th-gen Intel and Ryzen 6000/7000 in efficiency and multi-core performance.
Best for: Buying a discounted 2021-era gaming or workstation laptop where the i9-11900H is already installed, and you prioritize GPU and thermals over CPU generation.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Core i7-1195G7 or Intel Core i9-11900H?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-1195G7 comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Core i7-1195G7 or Intel Core i9-11900H?
For gaming, the Intel Core i9-11900H leads with a gaming performance score of 82/100 among Core i7-1195G7 and Intel Core i9-11900H.
Which uses less power?
The Core i7-1195G7 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Core i7-1195G7 (28 W), Intel Core i9-11900H (45 W).
Do Core i7-1195G7 and Intel Core i9-11900H use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Core i7-1195G7: BGA 1449, Intel Core i9-11900H: FCBGA1787), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i9-11900H has the most cores. Core counts: Core i7-1195G7 (4 cores), Intel Core i9-11900H (8 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i9-11900H posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Core i7-1195G7 (7,200), Intel Core i9-11900H (12,345). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.