CPU Comparison

Intel Core i5-660 vs Intel Core i5-750

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-660 is a dual-core Clarkdale desktop processor clocked at 3.33GHz with Hyper-Threading and integrated Intel HD Graphics, launched in January 2010.

Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-660
2C / 4T3.6 GHz73 W
3.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-750
4C / 4T3.2 GHz95 W
5
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
Desktop
Generation
1st Gen (Nehalem successor)
1st Gen (Nehalem derivative)
Launched
2010
2009
Status
Discontinued
Discontinued
Codename
Clarkdale
Lynnfield
Series
Core i5
Core i5
Family
Clarkdale
Lynnfield
Predecessor
Intel Core i5-650
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Successor
Intel Core i5-670
Intel Core i5-760

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
4
Base Clock
3.33 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB
TDP
73 W
95 W
Architecture
Architecture
Clarkdale
Lynnfield
Process Node
32nm
45nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
16 GB
16 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA 1156
LGA 1156
PCIe Version
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
None
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i5-66016

Slightly faster than the i5-650 but still fundamentally inadequate for modern workloads.

Intel Core i5-750Best25

Four cores help with basic multitasking but modern productivity apps will feel sluggish.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-6605

Cannot run any modern game at acceptable frame rates.

Intel Core i5-750Best12

With a discrete GPU, can handle older games but cannot run modern titles at acceptable frame rates due to CPU limitations.

Virtualization

Intel Core i5-66011

Two cores with Hyper-Threading provide minimal virtualization capability.

Intel Core i5-750Best20

Four real cores provide usable virtualization for lightweight VMs.

Efficiency

Intel Core i5-660Best30

73W for a dual-core processor is inefficient by modern standards.

Intel Core i5-75025

95W for four 45nm cores is inefficient by modern standards.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i5-660None
  • No AI acceleration
  • Far too slow for any machine learning workload
Intel Core i5-750None
  • No AI acceleration instructions
  • Far too slow for any ML workload

Content Creation

Intel Core i5-660Unusable
Intel Core i5-750Very Poor

Gaming

Intel Core i5-660Unusable
  • Dual-core limitation makes most modern games unplayable
  • HD Graphics 733MHz cannot handle any 3D rendering
  • Was barely adequate for 2010-era gaming with a discrete GPU
Intel Core i5-750Very Poor (Modern)
  • Cannot run modern AAA games at playable frame rates
  • With a capable discrete GPU, older titles (pre-2015) run adequately
  • The 2.666GHz base clock is a significant bottleneck

Industry Impact

Gaming
Negligible
High
Workstations
Negligible
Moderate
Content Creation
Negligible
Moderate
Virtualization
Negligible
Moderate

Best CPU by Use Case

Office Work
Acceptable for basic document editing
Web Browsing
Struggles with modern heavy websites
Media Playback
Handles 1080p with iGPU acceleration
Gaming
Unusable for modern games
Software Development
Very limited
Gaming (legacy)
Good for 2009-2012 era games with a discrete GPU
Multi-Tasking
Four cores handle basic multitasking adequately
Office Productivity
Functional for basic documents and spreadsheets
Modern Gaming
Unusable without a discrete GPU; limited even with one
Content Creation
Too slow for modern creative applications

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Content Creators
Developers
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i5-660

Pros

  • Slightly faster than i5-650
  • Integrated graphics for basic display
  • 32nm process was advanced for its time
  • Hyper-Threading improves multitasking

Cons

  • Only two cores
  • Extremely outdated for any modern task
  • Small performance gain over cheaper i5-650
  • No AVX support
  • Obsolete platform with no upgrade path
Intel Core i5-750

Pros

  • Four real cores provided strong 2009-era performance
  • 8MB L3 cache was generous for the price
  • Turbo boost significantly improved single-threaded performance
  • Excellent value that redefined mainstream desktop pricing
  • Overclockable via BCLK with good headroom

Cons

  • No Hyper-Threading limits multi-threaded vs i7 Lynnfield
  • No integrated graphics requires a discrete GPU
  • 45nm process is obsolete
  • No AVX instruction support
  • LGA 1156 platform is dead with no upgrade path

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i5-660

  • AMD Phenom II X2 565

    Dual-Core Desktop

    Rival
  • AMD Athlon II X4 640

    Budget Quad-Core

    Rival
  • Intel Core i5-750

    Quad-Core Desktop

    Rival
    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Phenom II X4 930

    Quad-Core Desktop

    Rival
  • Intel Core i3-540

    Budget Dual-Core

    Rival

Intel Core i5-750

  • AMD Phenom II X4 965

    Quad-Core Desktop

    Rival
  • AMD Phenom II X4 955

    Quad-Core Desktop

    Rival
  • Intel Core i7-920

    High-End Desktop

    Rival
    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Phenom II X6 1055T

    Six-Core Desktop

    Rival
  • Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

    Legacy Quad-Core

    Rival
  • Intel Core i7-860
    Alt

    Eight threads via Hyper-Threading for better multi-threaded performance.

  • Higher clock speed on the same platform for a small premium.

    Compare head-to-head

Our Verdict on Each

A minor clock speed bump over the i5-650 that did not address the fundamental two-core limitation. Obsolete for any modern use.

Best for: Maintaining an existing LGA 1156 Clarkdale system

Read the full review

A landmark processor that offered excellent quad-core value in 2009-2010. Completely obsolete today but historically significant as the processor that established the Core i5 brand.

Best for: Keeping an existing LGA 1156 Lynnfield system functional for light tasks

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i5-660 or Intel Core i5-750?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-750 comes out ahead with a score of 5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-660 or Intel Core i5-750?

For gaming, the Intel Core i5-750 leads with a gaming performance score of 12/100 among Intel Core i5-660 and Intel Core i5-750.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i5-660 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-660 (73 W), Intel Core i5-750 (95 W).

Do Intel Core i5-660 and Intel Core i5-750 use the same socket?

Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1156 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.

Which has more cores?

The Intel Core i5-750 has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i5-660 (2 cores), Intel Core i5-750 (4 cores).

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i5-750 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-660 (4,600), Intel Core i5-750 (6,750). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.