CPU Comparison

Intel Core i5-540M vs Core i7-640M

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-540M is a dual-core mobile processor built on the 32nm Arrandale architecture, featuring Hyper-Threading, Turbo Boost, and an integrated GPU die, designed for mainstream laptops in early 2010.

Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-540M
2C / 4T3.073 GHz35 W
3.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i7
Core i7-640M
2C / 4T3.467 GHz35 W
6
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Segment
Mobile
Mobile
Generation
1st Gen Core i5 (Arrandale)
1st Gen Core i7 (Arrandale)
Launched
2010
2010
Status
End-of-life
End-of-life
Codename
Arrandale
Arrandale
Series
Core i5
Core i7
Family
Arrandale
1st Generation
Predecessor
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
Core i7-620M
Successor
Intel Core i5-2410M
Sandy Bridge

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
2
2
Threads
4
4
Base Clock
2.533 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost Clock
3.073 GHz
3.467 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
3 MB
4 MB
TDP
35 W
35 W
Architecture
Architecture
Arrandale
Arrandale
Process Node
32nm
32nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-800/1066
1066 MT/s
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
8 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
Intel BGA 1288
Intel Socket G1
PCIe Version
PCIe 2.0
Gen 2
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
None
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i5-540M30

Basic office tasks remain functional, but anything beyond simple documents will feel slow.

Core i7-640MBest45

Strong single-core helps with older office apps.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-540M15

Cannot handle any modern 3D games. Only suitable for very old or browser-based titles.

Core i7-640MBest20

Requires a discrete GPU from that era for any gaming.

Virtualization

Intel Core i5-540M12

Two cores with 3MB L3 cache are insufficient for any practical VM workloads.

Core i7-640MBest40

Capable of basic VMs but limited by 2 cores.

Efficiency

Intel Core i5-540M40

35W TDP was reasonable for 2010 but is far less efficient than modern mobile chips.

Core i7-640MBest50

Typical 35W 32nm efficiency.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i5-540MNone
  • No AI acceleration instructions
  • No AVX support
  • Completely unsuitable for any AI workload
Core i7-640MNone
  • No AI hardware

Content Creation

Intel Core i5-540MPoor
Core i7-640MPoor
Basic Audio Editing

Gaming

Intel Core i5-540MPoor
  • Integrated Intel HD Graphics (first gen) is extremely limited
  • No dedicated VRAM, shares system memory
  • Unplayable in any modern game title
  • May run pre-2010 games at low settings
Core i7-640MPoor
  • Integrated graphics depend on motherboard chipset
  • Not suitable for modern gaming

Industry Impact

Gaming
Negligible
Moderate
Workstations
Low
Moderate
Content Creation
Negligible
Moderate
Virtualization
Low
Moderate

Best CPU by Use Case

Document Editing
Adequate
Web Browsing
Adequate with lightweight tabs
Fair
Video Playback
720p acceptable, 1080p struggles
Good
Light Multitasking
Acceptable with SSD upgrade
Office Productivity
Good
Gaming
Poor

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i5-540M

Pros

  • Historically important 32nm mobile transition chip
  • Turbo Boost added dynamic performance
  • Hyper-Threading improved multitasking over Core 2 Duo
  • Low cost on the used parts market

Cons

  • Completely obsolete for modern workloads
  • BGA package requires professional rework to replace
  • Only 3MB L3 cache
  • No AVX instruction support
  • Maximum 8GB RAM limitation
  • First-gen integrated graphics very weak
Core i7-640M

Pros

  • Very high clock speeds (3.46 GHz turbo)
  • Socketed design allows upgrades
  • Strong single-core performance
  • AES-NI support

Cons

  • Obsolete by modern standards
  • Integrated graphics not guaranteed
  • 35W TDP is high for a dual-core
  • Limited to 1066 MT/s memory

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i5-540M

  • AMD Turion II N530

    Budget Mobile

    Rival
  • AMD Athlon II P360

    Budget Mobile

    Rival
  • Intel Core i5-520M
    Alt

    Slightly lower clock speed but same architecture, often cheaper on used market.

  • Higher clock speed for better performance if the same BGA package is available.

    Compare head-to-head
  • Intel Core i3-330M
    Alt

    Budget alternative without Turbo Boost but same socket compatibility.

Core i7-640M

  • AMD Phenom II N930

    Mobile

    Rival
  • Intel Core i7-620M

    Mobile

    Rival
  • AMD Turion II Ultra M640

    Mobile

    Rival
  • Intel Core i7-720QM

    Mobile

    Rival
  • Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Phenom II P920
    Alt

    AMD alternative with more cores but lower clocks.

  • Intel Core i7-2640M
    Alt

    Newer Sandy Bridge alternative if upgrading platform.

Our Verdict on Each

A historically significant 32nm mobile chip that introduced Turbo Boost to mainstream laptops, now strictly relevant for maintaining older notebook hardware.

Best for: Replacing a failed CPU in an existing Arrandale laptop with BGA soldering equipment

Read the full review
Core i7-640MSituational

An extremely fast dual-core for its time, but heavily outdated by modern standards. The socketed design is a rare feature for laptops.

Best for: Upgrading a legacy Socket G1 laptop

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i5-540M or Core i7-640M?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-640M comes out ahead with a score of 6/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-540M or Core i7-640M?

For gaming, the Core i7-640M leads with a gaming performance score of 20/100 among Intel Core i5-540M and Core i7-640M.

Do Intel Core i5-540M and Core i7-640M use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-540M: Intel BGA 1288, Core i7-640M: Intel Socket G1), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i5-540M posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-540M (1,830). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.