CPU Comparison

Intel Core i5-2400S vs Core i5-3335S

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-2400S is a quad-core processor tailored for small form factor desktops that cannot accommodate standard 95W cooling solutions. By maintaining four physical cores but lowering the base and turbo frequencies compared to the standard i5-2400, Intel achieved a 65W thermal envelope. It lacks Hyper-Threading, a defining characteristic of non-K Sandy Bridge i5 processors, meaning it handles four threads natively. Equipped with 6 MB of shared L3 cache and Intel HD 2000 graphics, it provided a balanced blend of multi-core productivity and low-power operation for home and office PCs during its prime.

Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-2400S
4C / 4T3.3 GHz65 W
4.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i5
Core i5-3335S
4C / 4T3.2 GHz65 W
6
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
Desktop
Generation
2nd Gen
3rd Gen (Ivy Bridge)
Launched
2011
2012
Status
Discontinued
End-of-life
Codename
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Series
Core i5
Core i5
Family
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Predecessor
Intel Core i5-750S
Intel Core i5-2400S
Successor
Intel Core i5-3450S
Intel Core i5-4570S

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
6 MB
6 MB
TDP
65 W
65 W
Architecture
Architecture
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Process Node
32nm
22nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
32 GB
32 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
PCIe Version
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i5-2400S25

Handles basic office tasks but struggles with heavy spreadsheets or modern web apps.

Core i5-3335S

Handles office tasks adequately, but low base clock limits multitasking headroom.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-2400S15

Cannot handle modern AAA games, even at lowest settings.

Core i5-3335S

HD 4000 can play very old games (like Half-Life 2) at low settings, but is useless for modern titles.

Virtualization

Intel Core i5-2400S35

Can run a basic NAS OS or light VM, but limited by 4 threads.

Core i5-3335S

Basic virtualization is possible but limited by 4 threads.

Efficiency

Intel Core i5-2400S75

Good power-to-core ratio for the 32nm era.

Core i5-3335S

Excellent efficiency for its generation, tailored for SFF systems.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i5-2400SNone
  • No AI hardware capabilities
  • Too slow for practical machine learning inference
Core i5-3335SPoor
  • No AI acceleration
  • Low compute capacity

Content Creation

Intel Core i5-2400SUnsupported
Core i5-3335SPoor
Basic Photo Editing

Gaming

Intel Core i5-2400SPoor
  • HD 2000 graphics lack driver support for modern titles
  • Even with a discrete GPU, CPU bottlenecks severely
  • Playable only in legacy esports like CS 1.6
Core i5-3335SPoor
  • HD 4000 is insufficient for modern gaming
  • Low base clock limits performance
  • Suitable only for retro or 2D indie games

Industry Impact

Gaming
Low
Low
Workstations
Low
Low
Content Creation
Low
Low
Virtualization
Low
Low

Best CPU by Use Case

Document Editing
Fair
Light Multitasking
Fair
Home Server
Good
Media Playback
Good
Very Good
Office Productivity
Good
Light Gaming
Poor
Video Editing
Poor

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i5-2400S

Pros

  • True quad-core CPU
  • Low 65W power draw
  • Cool and quiet operation
  • Full 6 MB L3 cache

Cons

  • No Hyper-Threading
  • Low clock speeds
  • Outdated HD 2000 graphics
  • Not Windows 11 compatible
  • Locked multiplier
Core i5-3335S

Pros

  • Low 65W TDP
  • Includes HD 4000 graphics
  • Good for basic media tasks
  • Reliable quad-core design

Cons

  • Low base clock of 2.7 GHz
  • Uses outdated DDR3 memory
  • Not supported by Windows 11
  • Lacks Hyper-Threading

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i5-2400S

Core i5-3335S

  • AMD A10-5700

    Desktop

    Rival
  • Compare head-to-head
  • AMD A8-5600

    Desktop

    Rival
  • Intel Core i3-3225

    Desktop

    Rival
  • Compare head-to-head
  • Newer Haswell architecture with better performance and efficiency.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
    Alt

    Modern low-power alternative with vastly superior integrated graphics.

  • Intel Core i5-3330
    Alt

    Slightly higher base clock if power consumption is less of a concern.

  • Intel Core i7-3770S
    Alt

    Hyper-threading and more L3 cache on the same socket.

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
    Alt

    Excellent modern alternative for SFF builds with Vega graphics.

Our Verdict on Each

A power-efficient quad-core chip that is now strictly relegated to keeping legacy small form factor office PCs operational.

Best for: Direct replacement for a failed CPU in a Dell Optiplex SFF

Read the full review
Core i5-3335SSituational

A solid low-power CPU for 2012 SFF builds, offering decent integrated graphics, but outdated for modern computing.

Best for: Restoring an old SFF office PC

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i5-2400S or Core i5-3335S?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i5-3335S comes out ahead with a score of 6/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-2400S or Core i5-3335S?

For gaming, the Intel Core i5-2400S leads with a gaming performance score of 15/100 among Intel Core i5-2400S and Core i5-3335S.

Do Intel Core i5-2400S and Core i5-3335S use the same socket?

Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1155 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i5-2400S posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-2400S (2,400). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.