CPU Comparison

Intel Core i3-8020 vs Intel Core i3-9300

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-8020 is a highly obscure, cancelled 8th-generation desktop processor that was scheduled for an OEM release but never officially made it to the market.

Intel · Core i3
Intel Core i3-8020
4C / 4T3.7 GHz51 W
0
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i3
Intel Core i3-9300
4C / 4T4.3 GHz62 W
5
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
Desktop
Generation
8th Generation
9th Gen (Coffee Lake Refresh)
Launched
2018
2019
Status
Cancelled
End-of-life
Codename
Coffee Lake
Coffee Lake
Series
Core i3
Core i3
Family
Coffee Lake
Coffee Lake Refresh
Predecessor
Intel Core i3-7100
None (OEM Specific)
Successor
N/A (Cancelled)
None (Discontinued)

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Base Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
6 MB
8 MB
TDP
51 W
62 W
Architecture
Architecture
Coffee Lake
Coffee Lake Refresh
Process Node
14nm
14nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1151
PCIe Version
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i3-8020
Intel Core i3-930050

The 8 MB cache helps keep frequently used office applications responsive.

Gaming

Intel Core i3-8020
Intel Core i3-930050

Slightly better than the 9100 due to cache and clocks, but 4 threads remain a hard bottleneck.

Virtualization

Intel Core i3-8020
Intel Core i3-930020

4 threads are insufficient for meaningful virtualization.

Efficiency

Intel Core i3-8020
Intel Core i3-930058

The 62 W TDP makes it slightly more efficient per clock than the 65 W 9100.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i3-8020

No data

Intel Core i3-9300Minimal
  • No AI capabilities

Content Creation

Intel Core i3-8020

No data

Intel Core i3-9300Not Applicable

Gaming

Intel Core i3-8020

No data

Intel Core i3-9300Poor
  • Can handle very light esports at low settings if paired with a dedicated GPU
  • The 4-thread limit causes significant stuttering in modern games

Industry Impact

Gaming
None
None
Workstations
None
None
Content Creation
None
None
Virtualization
None
None

Best CPU by Use Case

N/A
N/A
Enterprise Office Work
Good
Home Productivity
Good
Light Gaming (with dGPU)
Poor
Media Consumption
Good
Software Development
Poor

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Students

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i3-8020

Pros

  • None (Cancelled)

Cons

  • Cancelled before market release
  • No Hyper-Threading
  • Fixed clock speed with no Turbo Boost
  • DDR4-2400 memory speed limitation
  • Obsolete architecture
Intel Core i3-9300

Pros

  • 8 MB L3 cache provides a tangible latency reduction
  • 62 W TDP is slightly more efficient than the 65 W standard
  • Higher clocks than the i3-9100 out of the box
  • UHD 630 included for display output
  • ECC memory support (if motherboard allows)

Cons

  • OEM-exclusive, impossible to buy at retail
  • Only 4 cores and 4 threads
  • No Hyper-Threading
  • Memory locked to DDR4-2400 MT/s
  • Outclassed by cheap used AMD Ryzen parts

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i3-8020

  • AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

    Budget Desktop

    Rival
  • AMD Ryzen 3 1200

    Budget Desktop

    Rival
  • Intel Pentium Gold G5400

    Entry Desktop

    Rival
  • The actual released version of this generation's entry-level 4-core CPU.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
    Alt

    A much newer and faster budget APU with strong integrated graphics.

  • A massive upgrade that adds Hyper-Threading for 8 threads.

    Compare head-to-head

Intel Core i3-9300

Our Verdict on Each

This processor was launched and subsequently cancelled. It cannot be purchased, reviewed, or used in modern systems.

Best for: There is no scenario where you can or should buy the Intel Core i3-8020. Because the processor was cancelled prior to mass distribution, finding a physical chip is virtually impossible outside of rare engineering samples. If you happen to encounter one, it would likely not function correctly on standard consumer motherboards due to potential microcode restrictions. Furthermore, even if it did work, a fixed 3.7 GHz clock speed on a 4-core, 4-thread architecture is drastically outdated by modern standards. Any current generation Ryzen 3 or Intel Core i3 would completely outclass it in every metric, including efficiency, single-core speed, and multi-core throughput. Do not spend money or time trying to acquire this silicon.

Read the full review

The i3-9300 is a minor tweak on the 9100, offering a bit more cache and slightly better efficiency, but its OEM-exclusive nature and 4-thread limit make it irrelevant for DIY builders.

Best for: The i3-9300 should only be considered if you are purchasing a pre-built desktop from an OEM (like HP or Lenovo) that happens to use this chip, and the price is heavily discounted. The 8 MB cache makes it a slightly better performer than a 9100 in single-task office environments. If you are building a PC yourself, you cannot buy this chip, and you shouldn't try to hunt it down on the grey market.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i3-8020 or Intel Core i3-9300?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-9300 comes out ahead with a score of 5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-8020 or Intel Core i3-9300?

For gaming, the Intel Core i3-9300 leads with a gaming performance score of 50/100 among Intel Core i3-8020 and Intel Core i3-9300.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i3-8020 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-8020 (51 W), Intel Core i3-9300 (62 W).

Do Intel Core i3-8020 and Intel Core i3-9300 use the same socket?

Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1151 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i3-9300 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-9300 (5,600). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.