CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-8020 vs Intel Core i3-9100F
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-8020 is a highly obscure, cancelled 8th-generation desktop processor that was scheduled for an OEM release but never officially made it to the market.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Acceptable for single-task office work, but heavy browser multitasking will saturate the 4 threads quickly.
Gaming
Can handle older esports titles well, but modern AAA games will stutter due to the 4-thread limitation.
Virtualization
4 threads are insufficient to run a modern OS and a useful virtual machine simultaneously.
Efficiency
The 14nm process draws more power than modern alternatives for the level of performance delivered.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
No data
- No AI acceleration hardware
- Lacks AVX-512 instructions required for modern AI inference
Content Creation
No data
Gaming
No data
- Delivers playable frame rates in CS:GO, Valorant, and League of Legends
- Severely bottlenecked in modern titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield
- System will not post without a discrete GPU installed
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- None (Cancelled)
Cons
- Cancelled before market release
- No Hyper-Threading
- Fixed clock speed with no Turbo Boost
- DDR4-2400 memory speed limitation
- Obsolete architecture
Pros
- Strong single-core clock speeds for its era
- Low $122 launch price made PC gaming accessible
- 65 W TDP is easy to cool
- No iGPU means no wasted power on unused silicon
- Compatible with cheap H310/B360 motherboards
Cons
- Only 4 threads severely limit modern performance
- No integrated graphics means a dead system if the dGPU fails
- Lacks AVX-512 instructions
- Memory artificially limited to DDR4-2400 MT/s
- Outperformed by cheaper used AMD Ryzen 5 parts
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-8020
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200GRival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 1200Rival
Budget Desktop
- Intel Pentium Gold G5400Rival
Entry Desktop
The actual released version of this generation's entry-level 4-core CPU.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
A much newer and faster budget APU with strong integrated graphics.
A massive upgrade that adds Hyper-Threading for 8 threads.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i3-9100F
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AFRival
Budget AM4
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Entry-Level AM4
- Intel Core i3-10100FRival
Next-Gen Budget
- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GRival
Budget APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-9400FRival
Mainstream Budget
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500Alt
A modern 6-core/12-thread processor that redefines budget gaming.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
If found on sale, offers a massive performance leap over the 9100F.
Our Verdict on Each
This processor was launched and subsequently cancelled. It cannot be purchased, reviewed, or used in modern systems.
Best for: There is no scenario where you can or should buy the Intel Core i3-8020. Because the processor was cancelled prior to mass distribution, finding a physical chip is virtually impossible outside of rare engineering samples. If you happen to encounter one, it would likely not function correctly on standard consumer motherboards due to potential microcode restrictions. Furthermore, even if it did work, a fixed 3.7 GHz clock speed on a 4-core, 4-thread architecture is drastically outdated by modern standards. Any current generation Ryzen 3 or Intel Core i3 would completely outclass it in every metric, including efficiency, single-core speed, and multi-core throughput. Do not spend money or time trying to acquire this silicon.
Read the full reviewThe i3-9100F offered decent single-core speed for its price in 2019, but the lack of Hyper-Threading made it age poorly compared to AMD's 6-core/12-thread alternatives.
Best for: You should only consider the i3-9100F today if you are repairing an existing LGA 1151 gaming PC and can find the chip for under $20 on the used market. It can serve as a stopgap to keep an older system running esports titles. If you are building a new PC, even the cheapest modern alternatives like the i3-12100F will completely obliterate it in performance. Do not buy this new.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-8020 or Intel Core i3-9100F?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-9100F comes out ahead with a score of 5.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-8020 or Intel Core i3-9100F?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-9100F leads with a gaming performance score of 55/100 among Intel Core i3-8020 and Intel Core i3-9100F.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-8020 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-8020 (51 W), Intel Core i3-9100F (65 W).
Do Intel Core i3-8020 and Intel Core i3-9100F use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1151 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-9100F posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-9100F (5,500). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.