CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-1115G4E vs Intel Core i3-1115GRE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-1115G4E is a 2-core, 4-thread embedded mobile processor featuring Willow Cove architecture, UHD Graphics G4 (48EU), and an IPU 6.0, designed for industrial edge computing and embedded visual systems.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles the UI and logic for single-purpose embedded systems well, but not suited for general productivity.
Adequate for running single-purpose industrial applications, HMIs, or signage software. The 2 cores are sufficient for dedicated tasks.
Gaming
Not designed or intended for gaming applications.
The 48EU GPU is further reduced from the already cut-down G4 tier. Gaming is not a consideration for this chip.
Virtualization
Two cores are insufficient for meaningful virtualization in embedded environments.
Not designed for virtualization. 2 cores and 15W TDP limit VM utility.
Efficiency
Highly efficient for always-on industrial environments, especially when power-capped at 12 W.
Excellent efficiency for embedded use cases. The 12W cTDP down option allows fanless operation in sealed industrial enclosures.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- The IPU 6.0 is specifically designed to accelerate edge vision and AI inference workloads
- Lacks the NPU power of modern dedicated edge AI chips but is sufficient for basic classification tasks
- IPU 6.0 can be utilized for edge AI vision tasks in industrial settings
- Lacks a modern NPU for broad AI inference
- AVX-512 provides CPU vector math acceleration
Content Creation
Gaming
- This is an embedded processor, gaming performance is not a relevant metric
- 48EU GPU is harvested/disabled silicon
- Not intended for any graphical workloads beyond display output
- Cannot handle modern 3D applications
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- IPU 6.0 provides dedicated hardware acceleration for edge vision tasks
- Embedded validation ensures long-term availability and reliability
- Configurable TDP down to 12 W for fanless industrial designs
- Low 2-core power draw is ideal for compact edge devices
- UHD G4 48EU graphics handle multi-display signage well
Cons
- Only 2 physical cores limit general compute performance
- Restricted to 4 PCIe lanes, limiting expansion options
- Not available through consumer retail channels
- No DDR5 support
- High launch price of $285 for a 2-core chip reflects embedded margins
Pros
- Rare ECC memory support in a mobile form factor
- Guaranteed long-term embedded lifecycle
- IPU 6.0 for machine vision and scanning
- Low 12W cTDP down for fanless designs
- VMD support for enterprise storage
Cons
- Very high $338 launch price for a 2-core chip
- Reduced 48EU GPU limits display and graphics capabilities
- Lower 3.9 GHz boost compared to consumer 1115G4
- Only 4 CPU PCIe lanes
- Not available through retail channels
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-1115G4E
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250UERival
Embedded Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UERival
Performance Embedded
- Intel N100Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- NVIDIA Jetson Orin NanoRival
Edge AI
- Qualcomm QCS6490Rival
ARM Edge
- Intel Core i5-1135G7EAlt
A higher-end embedded Tiger Lake option with 4 cores for more demanding industrial applications.
- AMD Ryzen R1606GAlt
An alternative embedded APU for ruggedized industrial PCs.
Intel Core i3-1115GRE
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GERival
Embedded Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GERival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Pentium Silver N6005Rival
Embedded Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250GERival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Celeron N5105Rival
Embedded Mobile
If ECC memory is not strictly required, this is much cheaper but lacks embedded lifecycle guarantees.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i5-1135G7EAlt
If the embedded application needs 4 cores while retaining Tiger Lake features.
- Intel N100Alt
A newer, highly efficient alternative for basic digital signage and kiosks, though without ECC.
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GEAlt
Superior multi-threaded performance and RDNA 2 graphics for advanced industrial interfaces.
Our Verdict on Each
A specialized embedded processor that trades standard PCIe lanes and core count for industrial features like the IPU 6.0 and long-term availability, targeting specific edge AI and vision use cases.
Best for: The i3-1115G4E is strictly a business-to-business component purchased by OEMs and system integrators through Intel's embedded channels. You should specify this processor if you are designing an industrial edge device that requires the IPU 6.0 for machine vision, needs guaranteed 7+ year component availability, and operates in an environment where a 12W to 28W power envelope is mandatory. Do not buy this for a consumer laptop or desktop build, as it lacks the PCIe lanes and core count for general computing, and it cannot be purchased through normal retail channels anyway.
Read the full reviewA highly specialized embedded Tiger Lake variant that trades GPU power and clock speed for ECC memory support and long-term supply guarantees, serving a vital niche outside of consumer electronics.
Best for: Designing an industrial tablet, medical device, or digital signage player that specifically requires mobile ECC memory support.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-1115G4E or Intel Core i3-1115GRE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-1115G4E comes out ahead with a score of 6.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-1115G4E or Intel Core i3-1115GRE?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-1115GRE leads with a gaming performance score of 15/100 among Intel Core i3-1115G4E and Intel Core i3-1115GRE.
Do Intel Core i3-1115G4E and Intel Core i3-1115GRE use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the BGA 1449 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-1115G4E posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-1115G4E (4,600). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.