CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Core i3-1115GRE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-1115G4 is a 2-core, 4-thread mobile processor from the Tiger Lake generation, featuring high clock speeds and Iris Xe-LP integrated graphics tailored for thin-and-light laptops and everyday computing.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles word processing and spreadsheets effortlessly, but heavily multitasked office environments will expose the 2-core limitation.
Adequate for running single-purpose industrial applications, HMIs, or signage software. The 2 cores are sufficient for dedicated tasks.
Gaming
The Iris Xe iGPU can handle older or 2D indie games at low settings, but modern AAA titles are unplayable.
The 48EU GPU is further reduced from the already cut-down G4 tier. Gaming is not a consideration for this chip.
Virtualization
2 cores and 4 threads are insufficient for running anything beyond a single, very lightweight virtual machine.
Not designed for virtualization. 2 cores and 15W TDP limit VM utility.
Efficiency
The configurable 12W-28W TDP range allows OEMs to tune it for excellent battery life in thin chassis designs.
Excellent efficiency for embedded use cases. The 12W cTDP down option allows fanless operation in sealed industrial enclosures.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated NPU
- AVX-512 provides some acceleration for specific vector math workloads
- Not intended for AI development or inference
- IPU 6.0 can be utilized for edge AI vision tasks in industrial settings
- Lacks a modern NPU for broad AI inference
- AVX-512 provides CPU vector math acceleration
Content Creation
Gaming
- Lacks the core count and GPU power for modern gaming
- Can manage basic e-sports titles like League of Legends at 720p/1080p low
- Memory bandwidth limitations heavily cap iGPU performance
- 48EU GPU is harvested/disabled silicon
- Not intended for any graphical workloads beyond display output
- Cannot handle modern 3D applications
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- High 4.1 GHz boost clock for snappy single-thread tasks
- Modern Iris Xe-LP integrated graphics
- Low 15W TDP enables thin, quiet laptops
- AVX-512 instruction set support
- Efficient 10nm SuperFin manufacturing process
Cons
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads severely limit multitasking
- 6MB L3 cache is small for modern workloads
- Only 4 direct CPU PCIe 4.0 lanes
- No DDR5 or LPDDR5 support
- BGA package prevents any upgrades
Pros
- Rare ECC memory support in a mobile form factor
- Guaranteed long-term embedded lifecycle
- IPU 6.0 for machine vision and scanning
- Low 12W cTDP down for fanless designs
- VMD support for enterprise storage
Cons
- Very high $338 launch price for a 2-core chip
- Reduced 48EU GPU limits display and graphics capabilities
- Lower 3.9 GHz boost compared to consumer 1115G4
- Only 4 CPU PCIe lanes
- Not available through retail channels
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-1115G4
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2Rival
Mobile
- MediaTek Kompanio 500TRival
Mobile
Offers 4 cores and 8 threads, doubling the multitasking capability with only a small power increase.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAlt
Provides 6 Zen 2 cores and 12 threads, vastly superior multi-core performance.
12th-gen successor featuring 2 P-Cores and 4 E-Cores for much better background task handling.
Compare head-to-head- Apple M1 (base)Alt
Far superior performance per watt and unmatched battery life in a similar power class.
- AMD Ryzen 3 5400UAlt
6 cores at a competitive price point, offering much better long-term usability.
Intel Core i3-1115GRE
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GERival
Embedded Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GERival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Pentium Silver N6005Rival
Embedded Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250GERival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Celeron N5105Rival
Embedded Mobile
If ECC memory is not strictly required, this is much cheaper but lacks embedded lifecycle guarantees.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i5-1135G7EAlt
If the embedded application needs 4 cores while retaining Tiger Lake features.
- Intel N100Alt
A newer, highly efficient alternative for basic digital signage and kiosks, though without ECC.
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GEAlt
Superior multi-threaded performance and RDNA 2 graphics for advanced industrial interfaces.
Our Verdict on Each
A capable entry-level mobile processor for basic tasks, hindered by its 2-core limit but benefiting from strong single-core speeds and a modern iGPU architecture.
Best for: Purchasing a highly discounted budget laptop for basic school or office work where no heavy multitasking is required.
Read the full reviewA highly specialized embedded Tiger Lake variant that trades GPU power and clock speed for ECC memory support and long-term supply guarantees, serving a vital niche outside of consumer electronics.
Best for: Designing an industrial tablet, medical device, or digital signage player that specifically requires mobile ECC memory support.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-1115G4 or Intel Core i3-1115GRE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-1115GRE comes out ahead with a score of 5.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-1115G4 or Intel Core i3-1115GRE?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-1115G4 leads with a gaming performance score of 18/100 among Intel Core i3-1115G4 and Intel Core i3-1115GRE.
Do Intel Core i3-1115G4 and Intel Core i3-1115GRE use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the BGA 1449 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.