CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-10105T vs Intel Core i3-10325
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-10105T is a 4-core, 8-thread low-power desktop processor utilizing the 14nm Comet Lake-R architecture with a 35 W TDP, designed for compact desktops and small-form-factor builds.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles basic office tasks fine, but heavy spreadsheets or multitasking will feel slower than standard 65 W chips.
The high boost clock makes everyday office tasks feel extremely responsive, though DDR4-2666 limits heavy data crunching.
Gaming
The low 3.0 GHz base clock and 3.9 GHz turbo severely limit gaming performance, even with a dedicated GPU.
Slightly better single-core speed than the 10320, but still requires a discrete GPU and is bottlenecked by PCIe 3.0.
Virtualization
4 threads can manage one lightweight VM, but the low power limit restricts performance.
8 threads are usable for a light VM setup, but the 65W TDP limits sustained virtualization performance.
Efficiency
Good efficiency for the 35 W power class, though the 14nm process is less efficient than modern 10nm alternatives.
Average efficiency for 14nm. AMD's competing chips at this price point draw less power for similar or better multi-core output.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI acceleration capabilities
- Insufficient performance for any practical AI workload
- No AI hardware acceleration
- Lacks modern AVX-512 instructions
- Not designed for AI workloads
Content Creation
Gaming
- The low clock speeds create a significant bottleneck in modern games
- Only suitable for very old or lightweight 2D games
- A dedicated GPU would be heavily CPU-limited by this processor
- UHD 630 is not for gaming
- CPU can handle budget dGPUs without major issues
- Lacks PCIe 4.0 for future GPU upgrades
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 35 W TDP enables very compact and quiet desktop designs
- Configurable down to 25 W for extreme thermal constraints
- Includes UHD Graphics 630 for basic display tasks
- Compatible with both 400 and 500 series motherboards
- 4 cores and 8 threads provide adequate basic multitasking
Cons
- Low 3.0 GHz base clock limits sustained performance
- High $134 launch price for a heavily downclocked chip
- Restricted to DDR4-2666 memory speeds
- Only PCIe 3.0 support
- 14nm process is outdated and less power-efficient than 10nm
Pros
- High 4.7 GHz boost clock for snappy responsiveness
- Official support for newer 500-series chipsets
- Intel SGX for enterprise security enclaves
- Efficient 65W power profile
- Flexible drop-in option for OEMs
Cons
- Launched after 11th-gen, making it immediately outdated
- DDR4-2666 memory speed severely limits performance
- Still uses PCIe 3.0
- OEM-focused, hard to find at retail
- More expensive at launch ($154) than vastly superior 11th-gen parts
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-10105T
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GERival
Low-Power AM4
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-10100Rival
Standard Power i3
- Intel Pentium Gold G6600TRival
Low-Power Budget
- AMD Athlon 3000GERival
Ultra-Low Power AM4
A modern 35 W alternative offering PCIe 5.0, DDR5 support, and vastly superior single-core performance.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i5-10400TAlt
If you need more cores in a 35 W envelope, the 6-core 10400T is a better multitasker.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500Alt
If you can step up to 65 W, this 6-core processor offers dramatically better performance.
Intel Core i3-10325
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-10100Rival
Budget Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-10400Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 4300GRival
Budget Desktop APU
Offers a massive IPC uplift, PCIe 4.0, and DDR4-3200 support on the same LGA 1700 platform.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600Alt
Doubles the core count and offers significantly better multi-threaded performance for a similar price.
- Intel Core i5-11400Alt
A 6-core 11th-gen part that shares the 500-series chipset support but offers much better productivity performance.
- AMD Ryzen 3 4100Alt
A modern Zen 2-based chip that provides better efficiency and upgradeability on the AM4 platform.
Our Verdict on Each
The i3-10105T offers adequate performance for basic tasks in a 35 W envelope, but its low clocks, DDR4-2666 limit, and PCIe 3.0 make it hard to recommend over modern low-power alternatives.
Best for: The i3-10105T should only be considered if you are repairing an existing SFF (Small Form Factor) office PC that requires a 35 W processor to match the chassis cooling capabilities. Its $134 launch price was difficult to justify even in 2021, as the standard i3-10100 cost less while offering significantly higher clock speeds. If you are building a new low-power system today, you should look toward 12th or 13th-gen 'T' variants which offer dramatically better performance per watt on a newer architecture. Avoid this chip for any new build, especially since it lacks modern features like PCIe 4.0 or DDR5 support.
Read the full reviewA niche OEM stopgap that offered slight clock improvements and newer chipset support, but it was quickly outclassed by 11th-gen alternatives.
Best for: Buying an Intel Core i3-10325 for a custom PC build in today's market makes very little sense. If you are purchasing a pre-built desktop or a barebones system that already includes this processor, it remains a solid performer for office work, homeschooling, and general home use. The 4.7 GHz boost clock ensures that snappy day-to-day responsiveness is present. However, if you are sourcing parts individually, you should absolutely opt for the 11th-generation Core i3-12100 or the i5-11400. Those processors offer significantly better IPC, DDR4-3200 memory support, and PCIe 4.0, often at similar or lower price points. The i3-10325's DDR4-2666 memory limitation is its biggest liability, holding back both CPU and integrated graphics performance. Only consider this chip if you are upgrading a locked OEM system that specifically requires a 400 or 500-series compatible CPU with these exact power characteristics.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-10105T or Intel Core i3-10325?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-10105T comes out ahead with a score of 5.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-10105T or Intel Core i3-10325?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-10105T leads with a gaming performance score of 40/100 among Intel Core i3-10105T and Intel Core i3-10325.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-10105T has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i3-10105T (35 W), Intel Core i3-10325 (65 W).
Do Intel Core i3-10105T and Intel Core i3-10325 use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1200 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-10105T posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-10105T (5,800), Intel Core i3-10325 (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.