CPU Comparison
Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i3-10105F
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i3-10100 is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the 14nm Comet Lake architecture, bringing Hyper-Threading back to the desktop i3 tier with UHD Graphics 630 and a 65 W TDP.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Office work and web browsing are fast, but heavy multitasking will show the limitations of 4 cores.
Handles standard office work and web browsing fine, but the lack of an iGPU means no hardware video encoding acceleration for quick sync.
Gaming
Can handle 1080p gaming with a mid-range GPU, though it will bottleneck newer titles compared to 12th-gen alternatives.
When paired with a mid-range GPU, it delivers smooth eSports performance and playable 1080p experience in older AAA titles, though modern heavy games will be CPU-limited.
Virtualization
Can run a single light VM, but 4 cores and 8 threads limit serious virtualization use.
Same 8-thread virtualization capability as the 10105, adequate for a single light VM.
Efficiency
The 14nm process is less power-efficient than modern 10nm alternatives, drawing more power for less performance.
Efficiency is comparable to the 10105; the disabled iGPU saves a negligible amount of power under load.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI acceleration hardware
- Lacks AVX-512 support found on mobile Tiger Lake chips
- Not suitable for AI workloads
- No iGPU means no Intel Quick Sync for video AI workloads
- CPU-bound inference is slow on 4 cores
Content Creation
Gaming
- Playable in older and e-sports titles with a dedicated GPU
- Will bottleneck GPUs above the GTX 1660 Super / RX 580 tier in modern games
- Lacks the single-thread speed of newer architectures
- Requires a discrete GPU to function
- Excellent frame rates in CPU-light eSports titles
- Bottlenecks modern GPUs in CPU-intensive games
- 4 cores/8 threads are the bare minimum for modern gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Hyper-Threading provides a usable 8-thread experience
- High 3.6 GHz base clock ensures sustained performance
- UHD 630 iGPU is reliable for basic display tasks
- Very easy to cool with a 65 W TDP
- LGA 1200 allows an upgrade path to 11th-gen parts
Cons
- Outdated 14nm manufacturing process
- Limited to DDR4-2666 memory speeds on this SKU
- Only supports PCIe 3.0, bottlenecking modern NVMe drives
- Small 6 MB L3 cache compared to modern chips
- Lacks AVX-512 instructions
Pros
- Extremely low launch price of $97
- No compromise on CPU performance versus the 10105
- Full x16 PCIe 3.0 bandwidth for the GPU
- Low 65W power draw
- Enables viable sub-$400 gaming PC builds
Cons
- System will not boot without a discrete GPU
- No Intel Quick Sync video encoding
- Limited to PCIe 3.0
- Memory capped at DDR4-2666
- 14nm process is power-hungry compared to competitors
- Limited to 4 cores for modern gaming
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i3-10100
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 3300XRival
Mainstream Budget
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AFRival
Value AM4
- Intel Core i3-9100Rival
Previous-Gen Budget
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600Rival
Mid-Range AM4
A massive architectural upgrade for a similar price, offering PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 support.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500Alt
6 cores and 12 threads provide much better multi-threaded performance on the AM4 platform.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
Often available at a similar price point with 12 threads and superior multi-core performance.
A 6-core Comet Lake option that provides a much better upgrade path on the same LGA 1200 platform.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i3-10100FAlt
If you have a dedicated GPU, the F-variant saves money by removing the iGPU.
Intel Core i3-10105F
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Gaming
- AMD Ryzen 3 3300XRival
Budget Gaming
- Intel Core i3-11100FRival
Next-Gen Budget Gaming
- AMD Ryzen 5 3500Rival
Mainstream Gaming
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-10400FRival
Mainstream Gaming
A generational leap in IPC and gaming performance if moving to the LGA 1700 platform.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600Alt
The best value 6-core option for modern gaming, offering much better longevity.
Only if you absolutely need integrated graphics as a backup.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
The i3-10100 was a solid budget chip in 2020 thanks to the return of Hyper-Threading, but it is now outdated, held back by PCIe 3.0, DDR4-2666 limits, and an aging 14nm process.
Best for: The i3-10100 only makes sense today if you are upgrading an existing LGA 1200 system on an extremely tight budget and can find the chip used for a very low price. It can also be considered if you are repairing an office PC that already uses an LGA 1200 motherboard and you just need a drop-in replacement. However, for any new build, it is obsolete. The i3-12100 offers a massive architectural leap for a similar price, featuring PCIe 5.0, DDR5 support, and dramatically higher single-core performance. Avoid building a new system around the 10100 entirely.
Read the full reviewAn exceptional value proposition in its time, stripping the iGPU to offer the cheapest entry point into dedicated gaming on the LGA 1200 platform, though now overshadowed by newer architectures.
Best for: Finding one used for under $30 to revive an old LGA 1200 gaming rig or complete a ultra-low-budget build with spare parts.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i3-10100 or Intel Core i3-10105F?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i3-10100 comes out ahead with a score of 6.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i3-10100 or Intel Core i3-10105F?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-10100 leads with a gaming performance score of 60/100 among Intel Core i3-10100 and Intel Core i3-10105F.
Do Intel Core i3-10100 and Intel Core i3-10105F use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the LGA 1200 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-10100 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-10100 (7,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.