CPU Comparison
Intel Core 3 N350 vs Intel Core i3-N305
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core 3 N350 is an ultra-low-power 8-core mobile processor built on the Alder Lake-N architecture, featuring a 7W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 for entry-level laptops and Chromebooks.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles word processing and spreadsheets effortlessly, but struggles with large macros or heavy databases.
Adequate for basic office tasks and web browsing. Single-threaded tasks feel slower than on P-core-equipped chips due to Gracemont's lower IPC.
Gaming
Lacks the memory bandwidth and core power required for modern AAA or competitive esports titles.
Not designed for gaming despite the better-than-expected UHD 770 iGPU. Very light casual games at low resolutions may be playable.
Virtualization
Not suitable for running virtual machines due to low core performance and limited memory channels.
8 threads allow for basic VMs, but single-channel memory and lack of P-cores limit practical utility.
Efficiency
Exceptional efficiency that enables all-day battery life in portable devices.
Very efficient at idle and light loads due to the all-E-core design. The 9W configurable TDP enables fanless or near-fanless operation.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Lacks a dedicated NPU
- VNNI instructions provide minimal acceleration for local AI workloads
- AI tasks should be offloaded to the cloud
- No dedicated AI acceleration hardware
- Gracemont cores include AVX-VNNI but lack the performance for meaningful AI work
- Not suitable for AI or ML tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- Single-channel memory severely limits iGPU frame rates
- E-cores lack the single-thread speed for CPU-bound games
- Playable only in very old or 2D indie titles
- Not designed for gaming
- UHD 770 (32 EUs) is better than UHD 64EU but still far from gaming-capable
- Single-channel memory severely limits graphics performance
- Older titles at lowest settings and resolutions may be marginally playable
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Incredibly low 7W power consumption
- Eight physical cores provide good basic multitasking
- Capable UHD Graphics 770 for media decoding
- Flexible DDR4/DDR5/LPDDR5 memory support
- Completely silent operation in fanless chassis
Cons
- Single-channel memory severely limits performance
- No high-performance P-cores for snappy single-thread tasks
- Only 9 PCIe Gen 3 lanes restrict expansion
- Not suitable for gaming or content creation
- Soldered BGA package prevents upgrades
Pros
- 8 cores provide good parallel throughput for the price
- Very low power consumption with 9W configurable TDP
- UHD Graphics 770 is better than expected for this tier
- Fully dynamic clock domains for granular power management
- Supports AVX-VNNI instruction extensions
- Enables very affordable mini PCs and Chromebooks
Cons
- No P-cores means weak single-threaded performance
- Single-channel memory halves bandwidth
- Only 9 PCIe 3.0 lanes severely limit expansion
- 6MB L3 cache is small for 8 cores
- Gracemont IPC is significantly lower than Golden Cove
- PCIe 3.0 is a generation behind the 4.0 support on U-series chips
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core 3 N350
- AMD Ryzen 3 7330URival
Entry-Level Mobile
- MediaTek Kompanio 520Rival
Budget Chromebook
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3Rival
Always Connected PC
- Intel Pentium Silver N6005Rival
Legacy Budget Mobile
- AMD Athlon Silver 7120URival
Ultra-Budget Mobile
- Intel Processor N200Alt
Offers similar efficiency at a potentially lower price point for even tighter budgets.
Provides 8 E-cores with a higher 15W TDP for noticeably better sustained performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 7520UAlt
Features Zen 2 cores with Radeon 610M graphics, offering better multi-threaded throughput.
- MediaTek Kompanio 1380Alt
An ARM-based alternative that provides exceptional battery life with capable integrated graphics.
A slight step up in price that nets you 2 P-cores and 8 E-cores for a massive performance jump.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i3-N305
- AMD Ryzen 3 7320URival
Budget Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 7520URival
Budget Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-1215URival
Mainstream Mobile
- MediaTek Kompanio 1380Rival
Budget Mobile
- Intel Pentium Silver N6005Rival
Entry Mobile
Same architecture at even lower 7W TDP if maximum efficiency is the priority.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Celeron N5095Alt
Jasper Lake alternative if even lower cost is needed, though with fewer cores.
Our Verdict on Each
The Core 3 N350 delivers exceptional power efficiency and capable media playback in a 7W package, but is strictly limited by its single-channel memory architecture and E-core-only design.
Best for: Purchasing a budget laptop or Chromebook for school or office work where battery life is the top priority.
Read the full reviewA unique all-E-core processor that offers 8 threads of parallel performance at very low power, but the absence of any P-cores means single-threaded performance is significantly behind hybrid chips. Best suited for devices where core count marketing and power efficiency matter more than snappy responsiveness.
Best for: Budget mini PC or Chromebook purchase where 8-core parallelism at low power is valued, and single-threaded performance is not critical.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core 3 N350 or Intel Core i3-N305?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core 3 N350 comes out ahead with a score of 6.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core 3 N350 or Intel Core i3-N305?
For gaming, the Intel Core 3 N350 leads with a gaming performance score of 15/100 among Intel Core 3 N350 and Intel Core i3-N305.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core 3 N350 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core 3 N350 (7 W), Intel Core i3-N305 (15 W).
Do Intel Core 3 N350 and Intel Core i3-N305 use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the BGA 1264 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core 3 N350 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core 3 N350 (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.