GizWires logo

CPU Comparison

Intel Core 3 201TE vs Intel Core 5 213PE

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core 3 201TE is a 45 W embedded processor with 4 Raptor Cove P-Cores, 8 threads, up to 4.6 GHz boost, 12 MB L3, and Intel UHD Graphics 730, designed for edge, industrial, and deterministic workloads.

Intel · Core 3
Intel Core 3 201TE
4C / 8T4.6 GHz45 W
7.4
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core 5
Intel Core 5 213PE
8C / 16T5.2 GHz65 W
7.8
Full review

The Bottom Line

Best overall

Intel Core 5 213PE

7.8
Rating

Best for multi-core

Intel Core 5 213PE

8
Cores

Most efficient

Intel Core 3 201TE

45
W TDP

Overview & Launch

Attribute
Intel Core 3 201TEIntel
Intel Core 5 213PEIntel
Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Embedded/Edge
Embedded/Edge (Desktop form-factor)
Segment
Embedded/Edge
Embedded/Edge (LGA1700 desktop form-factor)
Generation
Core 3 (Bartlett Lake, Series 2)
Core Processors Series 2 (Bartlett Lake-S)
Launched
2025
2026
Status
Launched
Launched
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Bartlett Lake
Series
Core 3
Core 5
Family
Bartlett Lake (Core Series 2)
Bartlett Lake (Core 5)
Predecessor
—
Intel Core 5 211TE (10-core hybrid, Bartlett Lake)
Successor
—
None confirmed for this exact segment

Specifications Compared

Specification
Intel Core 3 201TEIntel
Intel Core 5 213PEIntel
Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
8
Threads
8
16
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
12 MB
24 MB
TDP
45 W
65 W
Architecture
Architecture
Bartlett Lake (Raptor Cove P-Cores only; P-core-only, Intel 7 / 10 nm class)
Bartlett Lake-S (P-core only, Redwood Cove-derived cores)
Process Node
Intel 7 (10 nm class)
Intel 7 (10 nm-class)
Memory
Memory Type
DDR4 and DDR5
DDR5 and DDR4 (ECC supported)
Memory Speed
DDR5-4800 MT/s; DDR4-3200 MT/s (Intel rated)
DDR5 up to 4800 MT/s; DDR4 up to 3200 MT/s
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
192 GB
192 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
FCLGA1700
FCLGA1700 (Intel Socket 1700)
PCIe Version
PCIe 5.0 and 4.0
PCIe 5.0 & 4.0
PCIe Lanes
20
20
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core 3 201TEBasic (CPU only)
  • Intel DL Boost provides CPU-based AI inference support, but there is no dedicated NPU.
  • Suitable for lightweight models and edge inferencing where latency and determinism are more critical than throughput.
Intel Core 5 213PEBasic CPU inference only
  • Supports Intel DL Boost on CPU for INT8 inference, but lacks a discrete NPU or high-topology GPU, so AI workloads are limited to small models or batch jobs.
  • OpenVINO can leverage DL Boost for edge inference, but performance will not match NPUs or dedicated accelerators.

Content Creation

Intel Core 3 201TEBasic
Office ProductivityWeb DevelopmentLight Photo EditingBasic Video Conferencing
Intel Core 5 213PEAdequate
Light photo editingOffice and business content creationSoftware builds and testsEntry-level video editing with hardware encode/decode assistance

Gaming

Intel Core 3 201TELimited
  • UHD 730 iGPU with 24 EUs is not designed for high-fps gaming.
  • Playable only in esports or older titles at low resolution/quality.
  • No PCIe 5.0 x16 GPU optimizations; platform lacks enthusiast gaming focus.
Intel Core 5 213PELimited
  • Integrated UHD 730 with 24 EUs is sufficient for desktop compositing and video decode, not high-fidelity gaming.
  • No unlocked multiplier limits CPU-side tuning for gaming scenarios.
  • If gaming is required, plan to use a discrete GPU; even then, newer consumer chips are typically better value for gaming.

Industry Impact

Sector
Intel Core 3 201TEIntel
Intel Core 5 213PEIntel
Gaming
Minimal
Minimal
Workstations
Low
Moderate
Content Creation
Low
Low to Moderate
Virtualization
Low
Moderate

Best CPU by Use Case

Use Case
Intel Core 3 201TEIntel
Intel Core 5 213PEIntel
Industrial automation and robotics controllers
Very Good
—
Edge gateways, routers and appliances
Very Good
—
Digital signage and interactive kiosks
Very Good
—
Thin clients and HMIs
Good
—
Light edge inference with DL Boost (no NPU)
Moderate
—
Industrial control and automation PCs
—
Very Good
Edge gateways and IoT appliances
—
Very Good
Kiosks and digital signage controllers
—
Very Good
Light workstation tasks (CAD 2D, light simulation)
—
Good
Software development and CI runners
—
Good
General office and productivity
—
Very Good

Target Audience

Audience
Intel Core 3 201TEIntel
Intel Core 5 213PEIntel
Gamers
—
—
Content Creators
—
—
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
—
Targeted
Streamers
—
—
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
—
—

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core 3 201TE

Pros

  • Four Raptor Cove P-Cores with Hyper-Threading and up to 4.6 GHz boost.
  • 45 W base power suitable for compact embedded enclosures.
  • Dual DDR4/DDR5 support with ECC and up to 192 GB capacity.
  • Up to 20 PCIe lanes from the CPU (5.0 and 4.0).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 730 with Quick Sync for signage and media workloads.
  • Strong management and security feature set for edge (AMT, TXT, VMD, VT-d, TDT).
  • LGA1700 compatibility leverages mature industrial board ecosystem.

Cons

  • No integrated NPU; AI inferencing relies on CPU-only DL Boost.
  • 4C/8T limits throughput for heavily multi-threaded edge applications.
  • Platform and BIOS support may be limited to industrial motherboards.
  • Not marketed or priced for consumer retail; availability via OEM/ODM channels.
  • Locked multiplier; not intended for enthusiast overclocking.
Intel Core 5 213PE

Pros

  • Eight uniform P-cores and 16 threads with up to 5.2 GHz boost.
  • 65 W base power enables compact and quiet embedded designs.
  • ECC memory support on both DDR5 and DDR4 increases reliability for edge and workstation uses.
  • PCIe 5.0 from the CPU with 20 lanes supports fast NVMe and expansion cards.
  • LGA1700 compatibility allows reuse of existing 600-series embedded boards and coolers.
  • Intel UHD 730 iGPU with four-display support (eDP, DP, HDMI).
  • Long-life embedded focus improves supply stability for OEMs.

Cons

  • No integrated NPU; AI workloads rely solely on CPU and iGPU.
  • Locked multiplier limits enthusiast tuning.
  • iGPU (UHD 730) is not suitable for modern AAA gaming.
  • Memory speeds are conservative (DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200) by current desktop standards.
  • Embedded positioning means consumer motherboard support may be limited outside industrial vendors.

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core 3 201TE

  • AMD Ryzen Embedded R2515 (Zen+ 4C/8T)

    Embedded/Edge

    Rival
  • AMD Ryzen Embedded R2545 (Zen+ 4C/8T)

    Embedded/Edge

    Rival
  • Intel Core 5 211TE (10C/16T, 45 W, Bartlett Lake)

    Embedded/Edge

    Rival
  • Intel Core 5 213PE (8C/16T, 65 W, Bartlett Lake)

    Embedded/Edge

    Rival
  • AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 (Zen 2 6C/12T)

    Embedded/Edge

    Rival
  • Intel Core 5 211TE
    Alt

    Higher core count (10C/16T) and larger L3 cache (20 MB) at the same 45 W TDP if your workload scales with threads.

    Compare head-to-head
  • Intel Core 5 213PE
    Alt

    8C/16T with higher clocks and 24 MB L3, but 65 W base power; choose when you need more performance and can dissipate more heat.

    Compare head-to-head
  • AMD Ryzen Embedded R2000 series (4C/8T Zen+)
    Alt

    A competitive x86 embedded SoC option with Radeon graphics, PCIe 3.0, and integrated I/O; consider when AMD’s supply or ecosystem fits your design.

  • AMD Ryzen Embedded V2000 series (Zen 2)
    Alt

    Higher core counts and 7 nm efficiency, but typically PCIe 3.0 and different feature sets; evaluate for heavier edge workloads.

  • Intel Core i3-12100 (Alder Lake, 4C/8T)
    Alt

    A consumer 4C/8T option on LGA1700 if you need retail availability and BIOS support from consumer boards, but with different embedded features and lifecycle.

Intel Core 5 213PE

  • AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U (8-core, 65 W TDP, Zen 4, RDNA3 iGPU)

    Embedded/Edge

    Rival
  • Intel Core 5 223PE (8-core, 65 W, Bartlett Lake with UHD 770 and 5.4 GHz boost)

    Embedded/Edge

    Rival
  • Intel Core i5-14500 (14-core hybrid, 65 W, Raptor Lake Refresh)

    Mainstream Desktop

    Rival
  • AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (8-core, 65 W, Zen 4, Radeon 780M iGPU)

    Desktop APU

    Rival
  • Intel Core i5-13500 (14-core hybrid, 65 W, Raptor Lake)

    Mainstream Desktop

    Rival
  • Intel Core 5 211TE (10-core hybrid, 65 W, Bartlett Lake)
    Alt

    More cores if your workload scales well with threads, though it uses a hybrid P+E design.

  • Intel Core 5 223PE (8-core, 65 W, Bartlett Lake, UHD 770)
    Alt

    Slightly higher boost and better iGPU (UHD 770) if you need stronger display or transcode performance.

  • AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U
    Alt

    Competing 8-core embedded part with strong iGPU and AI engine, useful if your software stack favors AMD.

  • Intel Core i5-14500
    Alt

    More cores (6P+8E) for mixed workloads if you can forgo embedded-specific guarantees and ECC on DDR5.

    Compare head-to-head
  • Intel Core i5-13500
    Alt

    Cost-effective 14-core option on the same LGA1700 platform with DDR5/ECC support and mature BIOS.

    Compare head-to-head

Our Verdict on Each

Intel Core 3 201TERecommended

The Core 3 201TE is a competent entry-level embedded Bartlett Lake chip: 4C/8T at 45 W with modern I/O and strong management/security features. Its main limitation is modest core count for multi-threaded edge AI workloads, and platform support may be restricted to industrial boards.

Best for: Industrial and edge systems that need 4C/8T at 45 W with deterministic performance, DDR4/DDR5 flexibility, and long-term platform support.

Read the full review
Intel Core 5 213PERecommended

A focused embedded SKU that trades enthusiast features for long-term stability and platform compatibility. The uniform eight P-core design, ECC support, and 65 W base power make it attractive for edge and small workstation builds, particularly where LGA1700 infrastructure already exists.

Best for: Edge appliance, industrial PC, or small workstation build that benefits from ECC, PCIe 5.0 storage, and LGA1700 platform reuse.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core 3 201TE or Intel Core 5 213PE?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core 5 213PE comes out ahead with a score of 7.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core 3 201TE has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core 3 201TE (45 W), Intel Core 5 213PE (65 W).

Do Intel Core 3 201TE and Intel Core 5 213PE use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core 3 201TE: FCLGA1700, Intel Core 5 213PE: FCLGA1700 (Intel Socket 1700)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which has more cores?

The Intel Core 5 213PE has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core 3 201TE (4 cores), Intel Core 5 213PE (8 cores).

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core 5 213PE posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core 5 213PE (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.