CPU Comparison

Core i7-860S vs Intel Core i5-750s

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-860S is a low-power desktop processor launched in January 2010, based on the 45nm Lynnfield architecture. Designed for users seeking quad-core performance with tighter thermal constraints, it operates at a base frequency of 2.533 GHz and can boost up to 3.466 GHz using Intel Turbo Boost technology. It features 4 cores and 8 threads, aided by an 8 MB L3 cache. The 'S' suffix denotes a lower 82W TDP compared to the standard 95W of the i7-860, making it suitable for smaller form factor builds and home theater PCs. It utilizes the LGA 1156 socket and supports dual-channel DDR3 memory. Unlike Clarkdale, Lynnfield lacks an integrated GPU, requiring a discrete graphics card. Although obsolete today, the 860S represented an early effort by Intel to segment its lineup based on power efficiency, offering a compelling balance of performance and lower heat output for its era.

Top pick
Intel · Core i7
Core i7-860S
4C / 8T3.466 GHz82 W
7
Full review
Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-750s
4C / 4T3.2 GHz82 W
4
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
Desktop Low-Power
Desktop
Generation
Core i7 (Lynnfield)
1st Gen (Nehalem derivative)
Launched
2010
2010
Status
End-of-life
Discontinued
Codename
Lynnfield
Lynnfield
Series
Core i7
Core i5
Family
1st Gen Core i7
Lynnfield
Predecessor
Core 2 Quad Q9400S
Intel Core i5-750
Successor
Core i7-2600S
None (S-series Lynnfield ended here)

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
4
Base Clock
2.533 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost Clock
3.466 GHz
3.2 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB
TDP
82 W
82 W
Architecture
Architecture
Lynnfield
Lynnfield
Process Node
45nm
45nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
1333 MT/s
DDR3-1333
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
16 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
Intel Socket 1156
LGA 1156
PCIe Version
Gen 2
PCIe 2.0
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
None
None
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Core i7-860SBest35

Sufficient for basic office work and web browsing.

Intel Core i5-750s22

Slower than the standard i5-750 in sustained multi-threaded workloads due to the 2.4GHz base.

Gaming

Core i7-860SBest35

Can play older games fine, but bottlenecks modern GPUs.

Intel Core i5-750s10

Turbo boost helps in light gaming but the low base clock hurts in sustained loads.

Virtualization

Core i7-860SBest40

Good for basic home labs and VMs.

Intel Core i5-750s18

Four cores help but lower clocks limit VM performance.

Efficiency

Core i7-860SBest50

Decent efficiency for 45nm, better than standard Lynnfield.

Intel Core i5-750s32

Better efficiency than the standard i5-750 at 82W, though still poor by modern standards.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Core i7-860SNone
  • No AI acceleration
  • Too slow for modern AI tasks
Intel Core i5-750sNone
  • No AI acceleration
  • Far too slow for any ML workload

Content Creation

Core i7-860SLegacy
Basic PhotoshopLegacy Video EditorsAudio Mixing
Intel Core i5-750sUnusable

Gaming

Core i7-860SLegacy
  • PCIe 2.0 only
  • Requires discrete GPU
  • Lacks AVX instructions
Intel Core i5-750sVery Poor (Modern)
  • 2.4GHz base clock is too low for modern games
  • Turbo boost to 3.2GHz helps slightly in lightly threaded scenarios
  • Requires a discrete GPU for any gaming

Industry Impact

Gaming
Moderate
Low
Workstations
Low
Low
Content Creation
Moderate
Low
Virtualization
Moderate
Low

Best CPU by Use Case

SFF Gaming
Good
Home Theater PC
Excellent
Adequate with a discrete GPU for media
Office Productivity
Very Good
Light Video Editing
Good
Small Form Factor PC
Designed for this use case
Light Gaming (legacy)
Functional with turbo boost and discrete GPU
Modern Gaming
Unusable
Sustained Multi-Threaded Work
Noticeably slower than standard i5-750

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Core i7-860S

Pros

  • Lower 82W TDP
  • Good turbo boost headroom
  • 8MB L3 cache
  • Quad-core with HT

Cons

  • Obsolete platform
  • No integrated graphics
  • Locked multiplier
  • DDR3 only
Intel Core i5-750s

Pros

  • Lower power consumption for small form factor builds
  • Same turbo boost ceiling as standard i5-750
  • Four real cores with 8MB cache
  • Lower thermal output simplifies cooling

Cons

  • 2.4GHz base clock was slow even in 2010
  • Significant performance drop in sustained multi-threaded workloads
  • No integrated graphics requires discrete GPU
  • No AVX support
  • Completely obsolete platform

Competitors & Alternatives

Core i7-860S

Intel Core i5-750s

Our Verdict on Each

Core i7-860SSituational

A smart, energy-efficient Lynnfield chip for compact builds, though completely obsolete for modern use.

Best for: Repairing a legacy SFF LGA 1156 PC.

Read the full review

An interesting low-power variant that traded clock speed for efficiency, but the 2.4GHz base clock limited performance even in 2010.

Best for: Maintaining an existing SFF Lynnfield build

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Core i7-860S or Intel Core i5-750s?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-860S comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Which is faster for gaming, Core i7-860S or Intel Core i5-750s?

For gaming, the Core i7-860S leads with a gaming performance score of 35/100 among Core i7-860S and Intel Core i5-750s.

Do Core i7-860S and Intel Core i5-750s use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Core i7-860S: Intel Socket 1156, Intel Core i5-750s: LGA 1156), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i5-750s posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-750s (6,350). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.