CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-5820K vs Intel Core i7-5930K
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-5820K is a high-end desktop (HEDT) processor built on the Haswell-E architecture. Designed for enthusiasts and professionals, it features six cores and twelve threads, offering a significant multi-threaded performance leap over mainstream quad-core CPUs of its era. Operating at a base frequency of 3.3 GHz and boosting up to 3.6 GHz, it delivers robust computing power for demanding applications. Unlike mainstream chips, it utilizes the LGA 2011-v3 socket and the X99 chipset, supporting quad-channel DDR4 memory for massive memory bandwidth. With 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes, it provides extensive expansion capabilities for multi-GPU setups and high-speed storage arrays. The 140-watt TDP reflects its workstation-class design. While it lacks integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU, the 5820K excels in parallel processing tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and virtualization, making it a powerhouse for creators who need more than standard desktop platforms offer.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
6 cores handle rendering well, but lack the speed of modern architectures.
Respectable multi-threaded throughput in legacy workloads, but modern chips finish faster while using less power.
Gaming
Good for gaming, but single-core speed lags behind modern CPUs.
Playable in older games; struggles with CPU-heavy modern titles at high refresh due to lower IPC and clocks compared to newer CPUs.
Virtualization
Quad-channel memory and 12 threads make it great for VMs.
Adequate for lab use with its PCIe and memory bandwidth, though limited core count and efficiency by today’s standards.
Efficiency
140W TDP on 22nm is power-hungry by modern standards.
High 140 W TDP for 6/12; modern platforms deliver far better performance-per-watt.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- CPU inference is moderate due to core count
- No dedicated AI acceleration hardware.
- Suitable only for light CPU-based inference workloads.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Can handle modern games with a discrete GPU
- Lower single-core speed limits high-refresh gaming
- Great for multi-tasking while gaming
- Multi-GPU support was a highlight in its time, but multi-GPU gaming has declined.
- Capable of 1080p/1440p with a strong GPU, though new titles may bottleneck.
- Boost to 3.7 GHz is modest compared with today’s high-clocked desktop CPUs.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 6 cores / 12 threads
- 28 PCIe lanes
- Quad-channel DDR4 memory
- Unlocked for overclocking
Cons
- High 140W TDP
- Older 22nm process
- Only 28 PCIe lanes
- Lacks integrated graphics
Pros
- 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes directly from the CPU
- Quad-channel DDR4 memory support
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking
- Solid multi-threaded performance for its era
- Proven X99 platform with broad motherboard options
Cons
- No integrated graphics; a discrete GPU is required
- High 140 W TDP with older 22 nm process
- Lower single-thread performance than modern CPUs
- Platform has no upgrade path beyond Broadwell-E
- Memory support capped at DDR4-2133 officially
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-5820K
- AMD Ryzen 7 1700XRival
High-End Desktop
- Intel Core i7-4930KRival
High-End Desktop
- AMD FX-8350Rival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-6800KRival
High-End Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-5930KRival
High-End Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600XAlt
Vastly superior single-core speed and efficiency.
- Intel Core i5-12400FAlt
Modern alternative that beats it in almost everything.
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700XAlt
8 cores, better IPC, lower power.
Intel Core i7-5930K
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950XRival
HEDT/High-End Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800XRival
Mainstream Desktop
- RivalCompare head-to-head
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950XRival
HEDT/Workstation
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-6850KRival
HEDT (same platform successor)
Cheaper entry to X99 with 6 cores but fewer PCIe lanes.
Compare head-to-head8-core option on the same platform if you need more cores and lanes.
Compare head-to-headMuch faster gaming and general performance on a more modern mainstream platform.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 9 5950XAlt
16 cores, far superior performance and efficiency on AM4.
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700XAlt
Strong single-thread performance and modern platform features on AM5.
Our Verdict on Each
A solid entry point into the HEDT market, offering 6 cores and DDR4 support, though aging rapidly compared to modern alternatives.
Best for: Upgrading an existing X99 system for more cores.
Read the full reviewThe i7-5930K was a sensible mid-tier HEDT pick in 2014, offering nearly the same multi-GPU and multi-threaded capabilities as the higher-priced model while costing less. Today, it remains viable for specific workloads that need many PCIe lanes and memory bandwidth, but efficiency and single-thread speeds lag far behind modern chips.
Best for: A very low-cost used HEDT build that needs 40 PCIe lanes and quad-channel DDR4, especially for multi-GPU or many NVMe drives.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-5820K or Intel Core i7-5930K?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-5820K comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Do Intel Core i7-5820K and Intel Core i7-5930K use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-5820K: Intel Socket 2011-3, Intel Core i7-5930K: LGA2011-v3 (FCLGA2011)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-5820K posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-5820K (11,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.