CPU Comparison
Core i7-5750HQ vs Core i7-940XM
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-5750HQ is a mobile processor launched in 2015, targeting high-end laptops and small form factor systems that require robust graphics capabilities without relying on discrete GPUs. Built on the 14nm Broadwell-H architecture, it offers four cores and eight threads, delivering solid multi-tasking performance for its era. The processor runs at a base clock of 2.5 GHz and can boost up to 3.4 GHz. Its most defining feature is the inclusion of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200, supported by 128 MB of embedded DRAM (eDRAM). This configuration provides exceptional memory bandwidth, allowing the integrated GPU to handle moderate gaming and hardware-accelerated media encoding far better than standard integrated solutions. With a 47-watt thermal design power, it necessitates adequate cooling. Though end-of-life, the i7-5750HQ was a pioneering chip that demonstrated the potential of integrating large memory caches directly onto the processor package for mobile platforms very impressively indeed.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Solid quad-core performance but hindered by older architecture today.
Slightly faster than the 920XM but still heavily outclassed by modern CPUs.
Gaming
Excellent integrated graphics for 2015, capable of 1080p low gaming.
Handles legacy games well but bottlenecks modern GPUs and games.
Virtualization
Adequate for basic VMs with VT-d support.
Adequate for legacy mobile VMs but lacks modern I/O.
Efficiency
47W TDP is high by modern mobile standards, resulting in heat.
Power hungry and inefficient by modern standards.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI-specific hardware
- Basic CPU inference only
- No AI hardware support
- Pure legacy x86 performance
Content Creation
Gaming
- Handles older titles well
- eDRAM reduces stuttering
- Not suitable for modern AAA games
- Highest clocks for Socket G1
- No integrated graphics
- Bottlenecks modern GPUs
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Iris Pro 6200 with 128MB eDRAM
- Good multi-threaded performance
- Hardware media acceleration
- Configurable TDP
Cons
- High power consumption
- DDR3 memory only
- Soldered to motherboard
- Obsolete for modern gaming
- Runs hot under load
Pros
- Fastest Socket G1 CPU
- Unlocked multiplier
- High turbo clock
- 8MB L3 cache
Cons
- Extremely power hungry
- No integrated graphics
- Obsolete platform
- Produces excessive heat
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i7-5750HQ
- AMD A10-8700PRival
Mobile APU
- Intel Core i7-5850HQRival
Mobile Workstation
- Intel Core i7-5700HQRival
Mobile Performance
- Intel Core i7-6770HQAlt
Skylake successor with better efficiency and DDR4.
- AMD Ryzen 5 4600UAlt
Modern 6-core alternative with vastly superior integrated graphics.
Modern quad-core with Xe graphics and 10nm process.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Massive leap in efficiency and performance.
Compare head-to-head NUC-specific alternative with Vega graphics.
Compare head-to-head
Core i7-940XM
- Intel Core i7-920XMRival
Mobile Extreme
- Intel Core i7-840QMRival
Mobile High-End
- AMD Phenom II X4 MobileRival
Mobile High-End
- Intel Core i7-740QMRival
Mobile Mid-Range
- Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300Rival
Legacy Mobile Extreme
- Intel Core i7-2820QMAlt
Massive leap in efficiency and performance (Sandy Bridge).
- AMD A8-3550MXAlt
More efficient, though weaker, alternative.
- Intel Core i5-2520MAlt
Dual-core but vastly superior efficiency and single-thread speed.
Our Verdict on Each
A specialized Broadwell processor that delivered strong integrated graphics performance via eDRAM, ideal for small form factor systems without discrete GPUs.
Best for: Purchasing a used Intel NUC or mobile workstation for cheap media playback.
Read the full reviewThe fastest Clarksfield chip, offering a minor clock speed bump over the 920XM, but equally obsolete today.
Best for: Upgrading an existing high-end 2010 DTR laptop.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Core i7-5750HQ or Core i7-940XM?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-940XM comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Core i7-5750HQ or Core i7-940XM?
For gaming, the Core i7-5750HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 55/100 among Core i7-5750HQ and Core i7-940XM.
Which uses less power?
The Core i7-5750HQ has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Core i7-5750HQ (47 W), Core i7-940XM (55 W).
Do Core i7-5750HQ and Core i7-940XM use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Core i7-5750HQ: Intel BGA 1364, Core i7-940XM: Intel Socket G1), so each needs a compatible motherboard.