CPU Comparison
Core i7-5750HQ vs Intel Core i7-8809G
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-5750HQ is a mobile processor launched in 2015, targeting high-end laptops and small form factor systems that require robust graphics capabilities without relying on discrete GPUs. Built on the 14nm Broadwell-H architecture, it offers four cores and eight threads, delivering solid multi-tasking performance for its era. The processor runs at a base clock of 2.5 GHz and can boost up to 3.4 GHz. Its most defining feature is the inclusion of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200, supported by 128 MB of embedded DRAM (eDRAM). This configuration provides exceptional memory bandwidth, allowing the integrated GPU to handle moderate gaming and hardware-accelerated media encoding far better than standard integrated solutions. With a 47-watt thermal design power, it necessitates adequate cooling. Though end-of-life, the i7-5750HQ was a pioneering chip that demonstrated the potential of integrating large memory caches directly onto the processor package for mobile platforms very impressively indeed.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Solid quad-core performance but hindered by older architecture today.
Strong CPU performance, especially when pushed beyond stock speeds.
Gaming
Excellent integrated graphics for 2015, capable of 1080p low gaming.
Excellent 1080p gaming performance, further enhanced by overclocking capabilities.
Virtualization
Adequate for basic VMs with VT-d support.
Capable but limited by 4 cores.
Efficiency
47W TDP is high by modern mobile standards, resulting in heat.
Unlocked nature means it can draw significant power when overclocked.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI-specific hardware
- Basic CPU inference only
- Radeon GPU supports OpenCL acceleration
Content Creation
Gaming
- Handles older titles well
- eDRAM reduces stuttering
- Not suitable for modern AAA games
- Comparable to GTX 1060
- Can be overclocked for extra performance
- Excellent for VR
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Iris Pro 6200 with 128MB eDRAM
- Good multi-threaded performance
- Hardware media acceleration
- Configurable TDP
Cons
- High power consumption
- DDR3 memory only
- Soldered to motherboard
- Obsolete for modern gaming
- Runs hot under load
Pros
- Unlocked CPU and GPU for overclocking
- High-end Radeon RX Vega M GH graphics
- 4GB of HBM2 memory
- GTX 1060-class gaming performance
Cons
- Driver support has ended
- 65W TDP requires robust cooling
- Soldered and non-upgradable
- Runs very hot when overclocked
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i7-5750HQ
- AMD A10-8700PRival
Mobile APU
- Intel Core i7-5850HQRival
Mobile Workstation
- Intel Core i7-5700HQRival
Mobile Performance
- Intel Core i7-6770HQAlt
Skylake successor with better efficiency and DDR4.
- AMD Ryzen 5 4600UAlt
Modern 6-core alternative with vastly superior integrated graphics.
Modern quad-core with Xe graphics and 10nm process.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Massive leap in efficiency and performance.
Compare head-to-head NUC-specific alternative with Vega graphics.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i7-8809G
- AMD Ryzen 7 3750HRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-7700HQRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-8709GRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 2700URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-8300HRival
Mobile
10th Gen successor with integrated Iris Plus graphics.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 4800HAlt
Much better CPU and GPU performance.
- Alt
Modern alternative with excellent efficiency.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Better driver support and modern Xe graphics.
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800UAlt
Superior performance and battery life.
Our Verdict on Each
A specialized Broadwell processor that delivered strong integrated graphics performance via eDRAM, ideal for small form factor systems without discrete GPUs.
Best for: Purchasing a used Intel NUC or mobile workstation for cheap media playback.
Read the full reviewA legendary unlocked hybrid processor that combined an Intel CPU with AMD's highest-tier Vega graphics, offering exceptional performance and overclocking potential.
Best for: The Intel Core i7-8809G is a highly sought-after processor for enthusiast mini PC builders, specifically those using the Intel NUC8 VR (NUC8i7HVK) platform. It remains a highly capable solution for 1080p gaming at high settings and VR, offering performance comparable to a GTX 1060. The unlocked nature allows for significant performance gains through overclocking. It is an excellent choice for enthusiasts who want a compact, powerful, and tweakable system. However, driver support from Intel for the Radeon component has ended, meaning you may encounter compatibility issues with the latest games. Avoid this processor if you want a future-proof system or need the latest API support. It is best purchased for its unique hardware design, overclocking potential, and solid 1080p performance in small form factor builds.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Core i7-5750HQ or Intel Core i7-8809G?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-8809G comes out ahead with a score of 9/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Core i7-5750HQ or Intel Core i7-8809G?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-8809G leads with a gaming performance score of 88/100 among Core i7-5750HQ and Intel Core i7-8809G.
Which uses less power?
The Core i7-5750HQ has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Core i7-5750HQ (47 W), Intel Core i7-8809G (65 W).
Do Core i7-5750HQ and Intel Core i7-8809G use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Core i7-5750HQ: Intel BGA 1364, Intel Core i7-8809G: Intel BGA 2270), so each needs a compatible motherboard.